[johnforbes]

As a former CIA director, presumably he knows whereof he speaks.

As a Democrat, somebody must have told him to speak freely about the incredible stupidity and bad judgment displayed by Austin, Milley, Blinken, and Biden.

[Clownkicker]

"Panetta Says We'll Just Have to Go Bacvk to Afghanistan When ISIS and AQ Reconstitute"-johnflubs

Yeah, so why did Trump make such a stupid decision to draw down troops to a dangerous level and leave by May 31st, johnny?

You had no problem with Trump deciding to do it and starting to do it. Now you want to blame Biden because he finished executing Trump's negotiated agreement.

Hypocrite much?

[sillydaddy]

Biden brought in more troops, got some of them killed, and still left Americans behind...
and now says he accomplished the mission...

[Clownkicker]

"Biden brought in more troops, got some of them killed, and still left Americans behind...
and now says he accomplished the mission..."-sillydummy

Now sillydummy sees just a hint of the grotesque absurdity of Bush in 2003 standing on the deck of the USS Abraham Lincoln under a banner braying "Mission Accomplished".

The difference this time is that sillydummy just made up some stupid shit about Biden claiming he "accomplished the mission" when Biden actually said just the opposite-- that there was "no mission accomplished moment" as he withdrew troops.

Why is it conservatives just have to lie all the time? Didn't they have mothers to teach them right from wrong?

[johnforbes]

Why is it that leftists lie all the time.

Like Jen Psaki, I'll circle back on the Orange Girl Bad theme.

[sillydaddy]

The Taliban are now holding Americans hostage and will not allow them to leave the country...
Media reports Biden approval at 44%...I bet it's lower...

[Clownkicker]

44%?

Wow, that's what Trump supporters considered really good when Trump rode that rating for years.

One can only assume sillydummy doesn't actually think 44% is that bad at all since he thought it was great when it was Trump's favorable rating for so long.

[johnforbes]

But Clowntoker has asserted that Trump lost decisively, and that Joe's youthful vigor and raw charisma propelled him to the greatest vote-getting triumph in American history.

Of course, it is Labor Day and Clown is doubtless stoned earlier in the day than usual.

[Clownkicker]

"But His Lordship has asserted that Trump lost decisively, and that Joe's youthful vigor and raw charisma propelled him to the greatest vote-getting triumph in American history."-johnfibs

I never said any such thing. Not even as a paraphrase. You made it up, as you make up everything you post.

Yes, Trump lost decisively, as hard-Right AG Barr and every Republican Secretary of State and Republican Governor in the relevant swing states attested, but as I have explained to you, Biden won because Trump was simply loathed by 52% of the country and they voted.

It doesn't take charisma to beat an obese lizard in clown makeup who can't fold an umbrella. You just have to be vaguely human and more humans who are scared of fat, bumbling lizards will vote for you.

[johnforbes]

Newsweek magazine discussed how the 2020 election was "fortified" by paper ballots, by courts such as PA's elected Supreme Cout (which extended 3 days when the US Constitution gave such power solely to state legislatures), and by plenty of dead and ineligible voters.

[Clownkicker]

"Newsweek magazine discussed how the 2020 election was "fortified" by paper ballots,..."-johnflubs

Geezus, dimwit, who cares what Newsweek "discussed"? Editorial content is not fact, it's opinion. You'll fall for absolutely anything, won't you.
And who even knows what "fortified" is supposed to mean? It certainly doesn't mean Biden lost.

If Newsweek had evidence of ballot fraud they should have turned it over to authorities. But they didn't because they didn't have any evidence. You know this but you don't care. It doesn't fit your partisan narrative.


"...by courts such as PA's elected Supreme Cout (which extended 3 days when the US Constitution gave such power solely to state legislatures),..."-johnflubs

Yes, dimwit, you win some and you lose some. Just because you don't understand that voting was not extended by three days doesn't mean voting was extended by three days. It wasn't. You made it up. But your vocal contempt for the PA court is noted, counselor.


"...and by plenty of dead and ineligible voters."-johnfibs

Well, gee, if Newsweek "discussed" plenty of dead and ineligible voters that no Republican authorities could manage to find, then you should definitely shit bricks over the "discussion" johnny.

Why do you listen to such unsupported partisan nonsense? It has nothing to do with reality and it just pisses you off.
I bet that QAnon crap pisses you off too.

[johnforbes]

Newsweek is now, and always was, a haven of Democrats.

They did an excellent -- and surprisingly candid -- summary of the various attempts to "fortify" the 2020 election for senile Joe.

[Clownkicker]

johnforbes still doesn't grasp that to "fortify" an election is simply gibberish.

johnforbes also doesn't understand that no one cares about a Newsweek editorial or a Newsweek "discussion," 'Democrat' or otherwise.

Meanwhile, not a single Republican could find any cases of large scale, election-changing fraud, mail-in ballots or otherwise.

Please, just the facts, ma'am.

[elklindo69]

John Forbes is one of those conservatives who is breaking down the doors to see Trump and his cronies testify under oath in front of Congress for 12 straight hours on live national television to explain to the American public as to why it was so important to release 5000 hardcore Taliban fighters from prison and how much did they profit from it.........