[johnforbes]

The co-founder of the polarizing Black Lives Matter movement is under fire for buying a $1.4 million home in a posh California neighborhood that’s 88 percent white.

Thoughts?

[Clownkicker]

Yes, johnny, as always we're still waiting for your thoughts.

How are we to comment on how ignorant and partisanly hypocritical they are if you won't even tell us what they are.

Are you really going to make me go to FOXnews to find out what you think about it?

[sillydaddy]

Public records show Patrisse Khan-Cullors, 37, owns several high-end homes in the LA area...
and realtors in the Bahamas say she has also been eyeing properties in Nassau ranging in the $5M to $20M..
The question is where is the money coming from..Does BLM pay that well?
I guess she has achieved economic equality...
The world makes sense to me now...

[johnforbes]

One rule of life is to never trust anybody with a hyphen in their name, particularly when they are race-hustling.

Now that Clowntoker has the advantage of my thoughts, he will be able to proceed about his business enlightened and illuminated by the glowing wisdom thereof.

[elklindo69]

Trump is the greatest race hustler of all time.....but I'm thinking that Greene may actually overtake Trump with the "America First" caucus or more accurately the KKK caucus.

[johnforbes]

But the race hustling is proceeding apace now.

Democrats have race baiting as their only theme -- their sole method.

But the only systemic racism in America in the past 50 yrs has been affirmative action (revenge racism favoring minorities).

[Clownkicker]

johnforbes knows his own thread is the actual race baiting. Look at the title he gave it to rile up Republicans and Trump supporters about some guy simply buying a nice house in a part of town they want to live in, as if whites are the only ones who should be allowed to do that in his world.

He calls a neighborhood of expensive homes a "white neighborhood". It doesn't occur to him that the ONLY reason the neighborhood is 88% white now is that for the last hundred years whites have managed to keep minorities out.

I would guess that the 12% of residents of the neighborhood that aren't white only bought there in the last 20 years because they weren't allowed to live there before that. But times they are a changin', much to the chagrin of throwbacks like dishonestjohn.

There is nothing inherently "white" about the houses and streets there. There is no such thing. johnny doesn't even grasp his racism that is revealed by calling the neighborhood "white" in the first place, as though a black man is somehow out of place in a $1.4 million dollar home. When johnforbes understands that it is not a "white" neighborhood but only what he calls a "posh" neighborhood where anyone can live if they can afford it, then he might wake up to his own belligerent racism.

As to the co-founder of some particular organization buying there, it only proves that the neighborhood is not a "white" neighborhood at all. It is just a wealthy neighborhood close to desirable schools, doctors, grocery stores, restaurants, and every other thing people are looking for when they are wealthy. It's the kind of neighborhood johnforbes lives in as he criticizes a black guy for wanting the same things he wants.

That's exactly what the "Black Lives Matter" organization is trying to promote--the right for blacks to live where they choose without being killed by police for working in their garages, driving down the street, or going for a run.

But boy, does johnforbes resent them for expecting to be treated the same way he is treated. The reader can practically taste the bile in his mouth every time he starts an indignant thread like this.

[johnforbes]

No, what it illustrates is that everybody wants to get rich and live in a nice and safe place.

The co-founder of BLM wants town after town in America to be looted and burned, but not where she has one of her mansions.

This is rank hypocrisy.

Perhaps not as rank as the foul odor emanating from Clowntoker's post, but almost.

[Clownkicker]

^^^^^^^^ And there's that bile johnforbes just can't get away from...

[johnforbes]

Why thanks for that unsolicited praise.

As the rain falls on this gray afternoon, it does seem like another productive day on the Interwebs.

[Clownkicker]

"The co-founder of BLM wants town after town in America to be looted and burned, but not where she has one of her mansions."-johnfibs

I'm sure you can document that assertion by quoting them...

Unfortunately, you made it up, so you can't back up the made up stupid shit you post.

[johnforbes]

Of course, I can document that.

Truth is the ultimate defense to any claim.

[Clownkicker]

johnny, saying you can document something and then running away without documenting it is the behavior of a liar and an intellectual coward.

In other words, it's just more of the same for you.

[johnforbes]

You asked if I could document that.

My answer, as usual, was in the affirmative because I never make things up on the Interwebs.

[Clownkicker]

Yeah, johnny, I got it-- you can't document it and you made it up.

The proof of this is that you clearly couldn't document it and you made it up.

[johnforbes]

Of course, I can document it.

So you asked a question, and got a very clear and direct answer.

[Clownkicker]

But lies only count as answers in Trump/Republican/johnfibs world.

I don't live there. I live in the real world where real answers come in the form of the truth.

Unfortunately, I didn't ask any question. Your "answer" is just another evasion/lie that doesn't actually answer any question I asked. You NEVER answer any question I actually ask because you are an intellectual coward like Trump.

You simply made it up, as always.

[johnforbes]

I made a statement, and you inquired whether I had documentation.

As always, I do, so I responded in the affirmative.

My reply was, as ever, cordial and responsive.

[Clownkicker]

But I didn't inquire whether you had documentation. You're making it up as you make up everything you post. Because you never have documentation for your idiotic posts and that's all I said. I inquired about nothing. You made it up.

You have partisan propaganda that you swill down, just like this claim of yours that you can't document.

You listen to your handlers and believe every piece of shit they feed you without question.

The proof of what I just said is that you don't even have any documentation to support your lie that I inquired whether you have any documentation.

johnforbes simply eats shit and enjoys every bite. It's the life of a Republican.

[johnforbes]

Clown asked whether I had documentation.

I did.

Clown seems queerly querulous.

[Clownkicker]

But I DIDN'T ask if you had documentation, dimwit. You made it up.

Why is it you insist on living in a world of made up stupid shit, johnny? What's the appeal? Why do you find reality so frightening?

You're the most pathetic little man I've ever encountered.

[johnforbes]

We all remain baffled by Clownslacker's petulence.

He asked if I had documentation, and of course I do.

So why would a cordial, responsive reply foment such frustration on Clown's part?

[Clownkicker]

We all remain baffled by johnforbes being a lying cocksucker.

I never asked for any documentation but he still insists I did, despite the fact the proof that I didn't ask for any documentation is right over his head in this thread for all to read.

So why would a cordial reply serve any purpose when dealing with a dishonest cocksucker like johnfibs?

[johnforbes]

Clown is more baffling than the average muffler.

He is venting, but it becomes exhausting.

Clown should pipe down.