[johnforbes]

Fauci wears a $15 Washington Nats mask, and surely that has little if any scientific merit.

Of course, being a bureaucrat, he doesn't wear a mask himself if he doesn't feel like it, so he sat close to two others at a ball game and took off his mask.

Fauci also wore his mask with his nose exposed at other times, in a science demonstration hardly worthy of Pasteur.

[Clownkicker]

WILL JOHNFORBES GIVE IT A REST?

johnforbes can't face the fact that Trump is largely responsible for the scale of the mess we face today, so all he can do is be a loyal partisan tool and try to place blame elsewhere.

"...he doesn't wear a mask himself if he doesn't feel like it, so he sat close to two others at a ball game and took off his mask."-johnfoibles

johnny, there was nobody there. It is okay to go without a mask around your wife while you're drinking water in an empty stadium. I often go without a mask when no one is around. So do you. So does Trump. (Though I doubt Melania does when Donald is at home.)

With all the serious problems we face, with all the Republican governors arrogantly telling America to go out, get sick ,and die, why do you have some sort of vendetta against Fauci, causing you to start thread after thread after thread about nothing else? You are ignoring ALL the serious news about this pandemic EXCEPT for Fauci for some reason.

Go jack off somewhere else so we don't have to tolerate you walking around this forum proudly parading your tawdry hard-on for Fauci.

Nobody cares what Fauci does on his own time. I don't care if he wants to sit around drinking water in empty stadiums. Just put on a fucking mask, dimwit, and give it a rest already.

[Clownkicker]

WILL GOHMERT WEAR THE MASK?

REP. GOHMERT TESTS POSITIVE FOR COVID AFTER RECKLESSLY EXPOSING HIS STAFF, BERATING THEM FOR WEARING MASKS, THEN HE EXPOSES THEM AGAIN!

"Rep. Louie Gohmert — a Texas Republican who has been walking around the Capitol without a mask — has tested positive for the coronavirus, according to multiple sources.
Reps. Mario Diaz Balart (R-Fla.), Neal Dunn (R-Fla.), Morgan Griffith (R-Va.), Mike Kelly (R-Pa.), Ben McAdams (D-Utah) and Tom Rice (R-S.C.) have tested positive for the virus, along with Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.).

Connie Hair, Gohmert's chief of staff, declined comment. But after this article was published, Gohmert told his aides in person that he had been infected. <-----(Fucking unbelievable)

"When you write your story, can you include the fact that Louie requires full staff to be in the office, including three interns, so that 'we could be an example to America on how to open up safely,'" the aide added. "When probing the office, you might want to ask how often were people berated for wearing masks."-POLITICO


Will johnforbes bother to address this REAL problem in Washington or will he continue to beat his ground meat to this tired, morose tune?

[Clownkicker]

Another victim of Gohmert's reckless and unforgivable behavior:

"Rep. Raúl Grijalva (D-Ariz.) has tested positive for COVID-19 after being in Washington, D.C., this week, becoming the latest member of Congress to be diagnosed with the disease.

"While I cannot blame anyone directly for this, this week has shown that there are some Members of Congress who fail to take this crisis seriously," Grijalva said in a statement to the Arizona Republic.

Grijalva, who is the chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee, had been self-quarantining at his D.C., residence this week after chairing a hearing attended by Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas), who tested positive for the coronavirus on Wednesday."

(A small clue for johnforbes: the hearing was not held in an empty stadium.)

[johnforbes]

Fauci was rubbing elbows with two people, one male and one female.

Presumably just one of them was his wife.

He was also patting the catcher and not distancing with him either.

Is the cheap Washington Nats mask the state of medical art?

[Clownkicker]

"Is the cheap Washington Nats mask the state of medical art?"-johndouchebag


Fauci is trying to wear masks in public that typical Americans can actually get themselves, dimwit.

He's not going to go out in a "state of medical art " positive-pressure Biosafety level 4 suit.

If he did, no one would ever listen to him.

Then we would ALL be just like you. And you know where that would get us; Republican, arrogant, smug, and dead.

[johnforbes]

It is true that Fauci could be making a "common man " ploy to say, look, you may be a bit better off with a 15 dollar cloth mask.

But the Left erupts in glee whenever somebody gets covid like Herman Cain, so wouldn't it look silly for the chief "expert" Fauci to use a cheap mask and get covid?

[Clownkicker]

"But the Left erupts in glee whenever somebody gets covid like Herman Cain,..."-johnfibs

You're projecting again, dumnmy.

As proof of who it is that "erupts in glee" at someone's illness, look at the top of this thread ---> "Mayor Bottoms Tests Positive for Covid after marching with BLM Rioters"--- and see who started it because a Democrat got COVID. (Hint: It was not someone from "the Left" was it. And surprisingly, it wasn't even RealTool this time. It was some other partisan tool.)

Regardless, Fauci is not from "the Right" or "the Left". He has been working for thirty years for Democrat and Republican Administrations.

As far as Fauci getting COVID, I will be very surprised if he DOESN'T eventually catch it no matter what steps he takes just because his job forces him to work around maskless Republican tools and assholes every day. No one can really protect himself forever from ambient "stupid."

Fauci has been around a maskless Trump dozens of times. Fauci's mask won't protect Fauci from Trump. Fauci's mask only protects Trump from Fauci.

johnforbes continues to labor under the misapprehension that one wears a mask to protect oneself. That isn't how it works. N-95s (or better) will help protect you from others, but they put those others at risk from you. A regular two-ply mask is worn to protect those around you from the risk YOU pose to THEM. I understand johnforbes couldn't care less about endangering others, but he really shouldn't ridicule ME for taking steps to insure his welfare. That's really stupid. It's "Trump stupid."

[johnforbes]

Yep, that seems to be the theory with masks.

However, Cain was blamed for his own demise for not wearing a mask when, in that scenario, he woulda been the recipient.

The Left certainly cheered his demise and mask-shamed him after death.

Meanwhile, until March 31, Fauci did NOT wear a mask.

In fact, at the recent ball game, Fauci did not wear a mask and was photographed many times without one, so he is just a garden variety hypocrite.

[elklindo69]

When we are together me and my wife don't wear the masks.....does that make us hypocrites?

[johnforbes]

Not unless you are an infectious disease expert preaching to others, but clapping the shoulder of a baseball player and sitting maskless in between two people shoulder to shoulder.

Presumably your wife is one person, not the male and female sitting next to maskless Tony Fauci.

[elklindo69]

How do you know that they were all tested?

Check to see if the house is made of glass before you throw stones.............

[Clownkicker]

It's pretty telling that johnforbes can post about NOTHING besides face masks. Why is that do you suppose?

He has no "thoughts" about Trump admitting to dismantling the USPS to interfere with November voting.

He has no "thoughts" about Trump's squandering taxpayer money to campaign.

He has no "thoughts" about the Senate report just released backing up the Mueller Investigation's findings.

"A Republican-controlled Senate panel that has spent three years investigating Russia’s 2016 election interference and possible ties to the Trump campaign released its final, sprawling report on Tuesday, drawing to a close one of the highest-profile congressional inquiries in recent memory.

The Intelligence Committee’s nearly 1,000-page report was expected to substantially confirm the findings of the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, putting a bipartisan Senate imprimatur on a set of conclusions that President Trump and his allies — including some Republican senators and Attorney General William P. Barr — are trying to pick apart.

The committee did not preview its findings. Lawmakers and aides who wrote the report cautioned ahead of time that it would contain no meaningful new evidence of coordination between Russia and the Trump campaign but rather would add details to the already vivid web of contacts between the two worlds. Mr. Mueller found that Russia expected to gain from a Trump presidency and that the campaign expected to benefit from the Kremlin’s interference but did not establish an illegal conspiracy.

Lawmakers then produced a study of the response by the Obama administration and Congress in the highly partisan run-up to the 2016 election. Most recently, they found that a 2017 intelligence community assessment, assigning blame to Russia and outlining its goals to undercut American democracy, had been untainted by politics and was fundamentally sound despite attacks on it by Mr. Trump’s allies.

The report arrived in a fraught political moment, particularly for Republican senators on the panel who signed off on it and thus may find themselves at odds with Mr. Trump and other influential figures in their party. Since Mr. Mueller finished his work, Republicans close to Mr. Trump have sought to recast the president as the victim of politically motivated national security officials in the Obama administration.

The Justice Department’s independent inspector general has found that law enforcement officials had sufficient basis to open the Russia investigation and acted without political bias." <----(Let's see if that will sink into johnny's thick skull)

Three years and the Republicans found nothing. But let's all drone on incessantly about Fauci not wearing a mask in an empty ball park!... criminy, get your priorities straight, dimwit. (Though I know you have trouble getting ANYTHING "straight" since your youthful days of licentious R&R in Frisco.)

[johnforbes]

First, it is absurd to suggest the IG is or was neutral.

Secondly, the sole reason for the Mueller probe was -- as we well know -- the fake dossier Hillary paid 12 million for.

They all knew, from the start, that there was no evidence.

Weissman and Mueller both knew that.

[elklindo69]

OK class...........please raise your hand if you would like to see President Trump testify in front of congress for 11 straight hours on live TV to explain to the American public as to why his campaign staff in 2016 were dealing with Russian spies?

[johnforbes]

Elkin, stop with the Russia nonsense.

Nobody believes it, and Mueller and Weissman didn't believe it, and nobody beyond the 8th grade believed the absurd fake dossier which was the centerpiece of the FISA warrants and the Mueller probe.

It was all entirely political, and everybody knows that.

It was America's biggest political scandal, and all designed to sabotage the Trump presidency because Dems couldn't admit the 2016 defeat.

[sillydaddy]

OK class...........please raise your hand if you would like to see former President Obama testify in front of congress for 11 straight hours on live TV to explain to the American public why he is now kissing Joe Biden's white ass...

[divermouse]

ya elkin stop it. the faux senate hearing said nothing to see here. to prove it would not allow any witnesses to appear and limited evidence. just like the muller investigation. nope can't talk to him, or her, or him, or him, or him, and especially not person number one.

forget that the whole damn admin has ties to, tax evasion, russian contacts, operating as foreign agents repeatedly lied to the fbi, oligarchs, quiet money, bank fraud and commercial laundry mats.
There were not a plethora of reasons for the fbi to be listening to phone calls of ongoing investigations "sweet innocent gang of hustler entrepreneurs" doing "business" with russia. ignore the fact that what law enforcement does. ESPECIALLY after reasonable sources like england and austrailia and ex mi6 types tell you something is gowin' on. they look, listen, get up close and personal, sniff about see what pops out and write reports. you should stop reading. only listen to a real news source like oan , britebart and of course fox. or you can also certainly trust russian operatives on bulletin boards. putin said it was not true. trump said it was not true. and that's the truth.

elikn you should go study allegory of good and bad government. in it, i think you will find solace in today's supreme leader. or maybe not. as a bonus you won't have to wear a stupid socialist mask. you can go about as you fucking well please infecting as many as you like, cause hqc, magic, and push ups can cure it all.

[divermouse]

Silly i'm all in obama 11 hrs in the hot seat, and 11 hrs trump.
then lets keep score.

speaking of scores:
Recent administrations with the MOST criminal indictments:
Trump (Republican) — 215
Nixon (Republican) — 76
Reagan (Republican) — 26
"Recent administrations with the LEAST criminal indictments:
Obama (Democrat) — 0
Carter (Democrat) — 1
Clinton (Democrat) — 2
"Notice a pattern?"

[sillydaddy]

yeah..the Democrats get away with a lot of shit...!

[johnforbes]

No plethora of reasons to wiretap the Trump campaign.

The dossier was clearly fake. An 8th grader would look at it and laugh.

They wiretapped Trump's campaign to sabotage his chances and then to undermine his presidency.

Same reason Mueller and Weissman (who knew in the first 10 days there was no evidence) investigated for 2 more years.

[elklindo69]

[johnforbes]

The Flynn case, which Obama and Biden discussed in the Oval Office on Jan 5, 2017, showed how corruption was orchestrated from the very top of the corrupt Obama Administration.

Flynn will be wealthy by the time all the litigation about Obama Era corruption is done.

[divermouse]

hey mr lawyer, is it not what they were supposed to do when confronted by hostile foreign intelligence? why yes it is exactly what they are supposed to do. plethora plethora plethora... just getting a start on the groundhog day russian robot talk. plethora,

oh we're all waiting for the subpoena avalanches that are coming down the mountain. rip roaring constitutional affronts like lying 20,000 times about where he smoked a ciggy in the rose garden. oh wait that was trumpo, at least trump doesn't smoke anything but putins pole. and the gangs all good with that. burn down the house. pulling wings off flies for morality training. on the way to your clan meeting don't forget your bibles,confederate flags, and your polyester chinese made hats. and grab your
neighbors daughters pussy on the way. if your famous she will let you do it.

[johnforbes]

Anybody who actually read the fake dossier realized, a few pages in, that it was an absurd mess.

Nobody in "investigation" or "justice" ever believed a word of that fake dossier.

The applications for FISA warrants, the renewals thereof, and the Mueller probe for two years was all 100 percent Democrat politics.

[Clownkicker]

Only that's not what the Republican-led Senate investigation determined, is it, johnny.

Whether you like it or not, they found there was sufficient evidence to start the investigation.

That you disregard the findings of your own party only proves there is no evidence of any kind that can change your mind about anything if it means you would have to face a truth you don't like.

You lack integrity, utterly. "Lux et Veritas" my ass...

[johnforbes]

Biden admitted to the quid pro quo Trump faced impeachment for.

Democrats never accepted the 2016 election, so they used a fake dossier (which EVERYBODY who glanced at it KNEW was fake) to wiretap the Trump campaign and launch the two pointless years of the Mueller fiasco.

Light and truth point to these this.

[divermouse]

ya your right again. it was a mess... how did the republican party fall for such start to fin-- not done yet absurdity?

and your right again, only you used a couple of wrong words. maybe some would say you even lied by using the wrong words. i'm sure what you meant was, because you would never lie would you mr order of the arrow?
"No gullible republican in "investigation" or "justice" ever believed a word of that fake dossier. "

the non-gullible ones knew it was true but stayed on diversion message. as proven by the non hearing and non testimony. I wonder what that pays? speaking of lies what's today's count that your willing to accept? i'm pretty fed up myself.
light and truth... ha, that's rich. what, a 2 watt bulb on quarter power with a wistful delusional reality?

[johnforbes]

Nobody who finished the 8th grade could read that dossier and not instantly realize it was fake.

They all knew it was fake, and that Steele had worked with Hillary and the DNC to get Fusion GPS to cobble together the fake dossier.

They all knew lies would be told to the FISA court, and Weissman knew even BEFORE the 2 year Mueller probe that there was NO EVIDENCE AGAINST TRUMP.

But, because they could not accept the 2016 election, they did it anyhow.