Political discussions about everything
By johnforbes
#126677
As professor of epidemiology at Yale School of Public Health, I have authored over 300 peer-reviewed publications and currently hold senior positions on the editorial boards of several leading journals. I am usually accustomed to advocating for positions within the mainstream of medicine, so have been flummoxed to find that, in the midst of a crisis, I am fighting for a treatment that the data fully support but which, for reasons having nothing to do with a correct understanding of the science, has been pushed to the sidelines. As a result, tens of thousands of patients with COVID-19 are dying unnecessarily. Fortunately, the situation can be reversed easily and quickly.

I am referring, of course, to the medication hydroxychloroquine. When this inexpensive oral medication is given very early in the course of illness, before the virus has had time to multiply beyond control, it has shown to be highly effective, especially when given in combination with the antibiotics azithromycin or doxycycline and the nutritional supplement zinc.

On May 27, I published an article in the American Journal of Epidemiology (AJE) entitled, "Early Outpatient Treatment of Symptomatic, High-Risk COVID-19 Patients that Should be Ramped-Up Immediately as Key to the Pandemic Crisis." That article, published in the world's leading epidemiology journal, analyzed five studies, demonstrating clear-cut and significant benefits to treated patients, plus other very large studies that showed the medication safety.

Physicians who have been using these medications in the face of widespread skepticism have been truly heroic. They have done what the science shows is best for their patients, often at great personal risk. I myself know of two doctors who have saved the lives of hundreds of patients with these medications, but are now fighting state medical boards to save their licenses and reputations. The cases against them are completely without scientific merit.

Since publication of my May 27 article, seven more studies have demonstrated similar benefit. In a lengthy follow-up letter, also published by AJE, I discuss these seven studies and renew my call for the immediate early use of hydroxychloroquine in high-risk patients. These seven studies include: an additional 400 high-risk patients treated by Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, with zero deaths; four studies totaling almost 500 high-risk patients treated in nursing homes and clinics across the U.S., with no deaths; a controlled trial of more than 700 high-risk patients in Brazil, with significantly reduced risk of hospitalization and two deaths among 334 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine; and another study of 398 matched patients in France, also with significantly reduced hospitalization risk. Since my letter was published, even more doctors have reported to me their completely successful use.
By elklindo69
#126710
FDA cautions against use of hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine for COVID-19 outside of the hospital setting or a clinical trial due to risk of heart rhythm problems

July 1, 2020 Update: A summary of the FDA review of safety issues with the use of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine to treat hospitalized patients with COVID-19 is now available. This includes reports of serious heart rhythm problems and other safety issues, including blood and lymph system disorders, kidney injuries, and liver problems and failure.
By johnforbes
#126734
But doctors have 3/4 of a century of experience Rxing this, and it is not a problem.

The reality is that the Left is campaigning against HCQ.

Listen to the lady doctor on this video explain her experience actually treating patients:

By divermouse
#126773
stella immanuel is that your source above the removed youtube video? are you kidding me?. you watched this and had the balls to present it as "proof" of hqc? you actually watched this and believed it. you are a fucked up little man. i may misspell shit and get lost in my syntax but you are obviously NOT 50 iq points above anybody or anything for that matter.
By johnforbes
#126778
Diver, wake up.

It is NOT proof of anything but the opinions of doctors.

The First Amendment means people have the right to speak, and these doctors did, and it was disgusting that the leftists at YouTube deleted it.

Diver, let me say this again: I will defend your right to speak, even though I may disagree with what you say.

Do you understand now?
By elklindo69
#126889
Johnnie...if your grievance with youtube is that they moderate content....then don't watch videos on youtube.

Youtube is a private property and they have the right to moderate the content on their platform whether you like it or not. So you may have to find some other sort of fringe outlet for your conspiracy theories about alien DNA and Demon Sperm.

Freaks................

Notice johnforbes is adamant denying that he has e[…]

Come on Elkin, if you had ever been there, you'd k[…]

Evidence from the Durham Annex

"Now evidence from the Durham annex proving t[…]

Remember Brooke Shields in her Calvin Klein Jeans?[…]

Mr Forbes has never cited AI. In the most charmin[…]

Obliterated what?

As if Trump wasn't using unsecured private email s[…]

Well. A lot of people say a lot of things some tr[…]