[snakeoil]

https://thehill.com/policy/finance/3347 ... mps-budget

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics ... 2497504dfa

https://www.cbpp.org/research/federal-b ... budget-are

https://www.vermontlaw.edu/blog/climate ... on-science

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireSto ... d-69594177

https://actionnetwork.org/user_files/us ... -Dozen.pdf

https://news.yahoo.com/trump-budget-zer ... 02421.html

https://www.scientificamerican.com/arti ... der-trump/

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa- ... SKCN1UI0AH

[johnforbes]

But, if Trump is to be judged on skin tone, should Obama be judged for that?

And, if Trump is a moron, is it safe to assume Snakeoil is a multi-billionaire and a president?

Or is he neither?

Also, a collection of links is not a point, but a bunch of links.

[Clownkicker]

"But, if Trump is to be judged on skin tone, should Obama be judged for that?"-johnflubs

It isn't his skin tone, you fucking partisan tool. It's clown makeup. The guy wears clown makeup and looks like a raccoon. And there's no one around him that dares to tell him how stupid he looks. That reflects on his character, his deep insecurities, and his poor leadership, dummy.

"Also, a collection of links is not a point, but a bunch of links."-johnflubs

And you start thread after partisan thread containing no thoughts whatsoever or any points at all. Why is it fine for you but not for others?

johnny, your inane partisan hypocrisy is going to get you every time. It repeatedly exposes your intellectual impotence.

[Clownkicker]

But snakeoil does something you NEVER do, johnny. He provides links to information so that others can make up their own minds.

You simply make unsupported partisan assertions that cannot be weighed by others for their validity. Probably because you know your comments won't hold up under the least bit of scrutiny. You're a coward.

[snakeoil]

Clownkicker...You know that John hasn't opened even one of these links. He doesn't want to contaminate his brain with facts.

[sillydaddy]

But snakeoil does something you NEVER do, johnny. He provides links to information so that others can make up their own minds.

Most of those links were posted by whiny liberals bitching about budget cuts...but I found this little gem among all the bullshit..!

".. Nothing improper about airmen displaying pro-Trump merchandise at Ramstein, Air Force says... "

[Clownkicker]

There you go, johnny. Even sillydummy says the links are non-partisan.

You can read them now. They won't harm your fragile and delicate mind if you are honest.

[johnforbes]

Snake, when you are ready to play "Jeopardy!" against me, please let me know.

I'd be delighted to find out which one of us knows more facts.

[snakeoil]

https://www.usdebtclock.org/

[johnforbes]

Snake, your thread title was moronic and showed that you judge people by skin tone.

That is racist.

Would you do a thread on Obama mentioning purple lips that have to have makeup applied daily?

Of course you wouldn't, and that is mere partisan hypocrisy.

[Clownkicker]

I see, so your problem is with the thread title.

Do you even understand what "racist" means? It certainly doesn't mean judging people of your own ethnic group by the makeup they apply. Your ignorance of the English language is staggering.

Incidentally, if Obama had purple lips that he clearly didn't apply makeup to because you were compulsively commenting about his purple lips, and nobody but you ever brought it up, then what the fuck are you talking about? "Hollow chocolate bunny" is not referring to Obama's makeup and you know it, even as the partisan douche bag you are. Nobody here has EVER made a racial slur, or even a racial comment, about Trump the way your cohorts talked about Obama. sillydummy is unapologetically the worst of them.

Now, what about the several nonpartisan articles snakeoil linked?

Thoughts? Do you ever have any? When you post multiple threads without any comments or thoughts of your own included, you have no problem with such threads.

Can you ever escape your nit-picky partisan hypocrisy? (That's rhetorical, of course. We know the answer already.)

[johnforbes]

Judging the merit of people by skin tone is PRECISELY what "racism" means.

It would be as bad as judging Obama by his jug ears.

[Clownkicker]

"Judging the merit of people by skin tone is PRECISELY what "racism" means."-johnfibs

That isn't even remotely what it means, johnny. You made it up.
Why do you lie like that to people who know perfectly well that it's a lie?

There can be an African American with lighter skin than some European American, but the European American will still racially discriminate against the African American and vice versa. Why is that? It certainly isn't because of skin tone.

And one more time for the truly stupid here: no one has EVER discriminated against Trump because of his skin tone. Trump does not have orange skin. He is not jaundiced. He has poorly applied orange makeup, you imbecile. His makeup is not his skin tone.

[johnforbes]

Jaundiced folks are more yellow.

To locate that color, you could simply refer to Bill Clinton's spine.

[elklindo69]

I wonder what cadet bone spur is up to now?

Apparently nothing upsets Trump more than being unfairly blamed for his own fuck ups.

[snakeoil]

Snake, your thread title was moronic and showed that you judge people by skin tone.

That is racist.

Wrong. The Debt Clock post got to you didn't it? You had to post that I am a racist to try and get people to not think about the debt. I remember the GOP railing about the Dems for decades about running the National Debt up too high. The Orange Moron has added 13 trillion and not a peep from the GOP.

[snakeoil]

Think about it John...13 trillion in 3 1/2 years. That has to be some kind of record. Wait...finally, he is the best at something.

The Orange Moron is the greatest National Debt grower in history!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Clownkicker]

johnforbes has been paralyzed when it comes to political discussion.

He can no longer attack someone's politics because they are fat and out of shape because his guy is obese and out of shape.

He can no longer say someone is spending like a fleet of drunken sailors because his guy is breaking records when it comes to spending.

He can no longer criticize Obama for overseeing the best economic recovery in 50 years because his guy is overseeing a massive decline.

He can no longer say someone is inarticulate because his guy speaks English like a middle-schooler.

johnforbes is now limited to making just one 'political argument'--the ad hominem attack against the messenger of unflattering or damning news-- so all johnforbes can do is repost his own debunked idiotic droning because to actually discuss what someone actually said would expose his intellectual impotence.

[Clownkicker]

johnforbes can't simply ridicule someone for being impeached because his guy was impeached.

He can't say someone's politics can be ignored because they are a draft dodger because his guy is also a draft dodger.

He can't criticize someone for being racist because his guy has a history of racist behavior.

He can't criticize someone for philandering because his guy has taken cheating and payoffs to a whole new level.

He can't criticize someone for their vanity because his guy is even more vain.

He can't criticize someone for nepotism because his guy has built his entire administration around nepotism.

He can't criticize someone for lying because his guy lies to America five times a day.

He can't criticize someone for being involved in a scandal because his guy is involved in a new scandal each week.

He can't criticize someone for being too old to be in office and showing signs of mental decline because his guy is also too old and showing signs of mental decline.

The list just goes on.... Trump exhibits every previously 'disqualifying' characteristic of johnforbes' politics.

johnforbes is now limited to impotent political posturing and humorless 'jokes' as he is forced to support everything he has claimed he holds in contempt. Now he must argue actual policy, ethics, philosophy, or law instead of someone's superficial personal traits, and that leaves him coming to a gunfight carrying only his limp slingshot.

[johnforbes]

The thread title judged a person by skin tone.

That is the very definition of racism.

[Clownkicker]

"... so all johnforbes can do is repost his own debunked idiotic droning because to actually discuss what someone actually said would expose his intellectual impotence."-me

"The thread title judged a person by skin tone.
That is the very definition of racism."-johnfibs

^^^^^^^And there it is.

I hate being right all the time about Trump supporters. It's depressing to have to admit my own species is rife with that level of stupidity. Especially after a college education.

[johnforbes]

Clown is correct that this thread title -- and, indeed, premise --is racist.

I admit that even though Clown's other comments are not so much morn as bore-on.

[elklindo69]

So Johnnie when will Trump have one of his Nazi hatefests again?

Apparently the confederate flags wavers and ammosexuals in Michigan are getting anxious.

[sillydaddy]

Elk is lonely...!