As I said, johnforbes consistently chooses the phony partisan talking points over reality and facts.
johnforbes tries to make the statues monuments to states' rights, and they were in as much as the states' rights being fought for was the right to own slaves. For dimwits like johnforbes, slavery of blacks by whites is racist.
And don't take my word for it. Look at the primary historical documents of the states that seceded from the union.
https://www.battlefields.org/learn/prim ... ing-states
In them they tell you just how many of them specifically stated that their main reason for seceding was their insistence on keeping slavery legal.
The bulk of these statues were raised in the 20th century, decades after the events commemorated, in order to help racist white organizations perpetuate Jim Crow in the southern states. I am not surprised that johnforbes wants to commemorate such racism as his right, but the the rest of the country wants to remove that portion of offensive American 'culture' from the town squares and move it to historical museums where it belongs.
Construing them as honoring racism is perfectly reasonable and honest. dishonestjohnforbes is not.