[RealJustme]

The writing is on the wall!

[elklindo69]

Of course dimwit....Trump is the only republican candidate.

[elklindo69]

Democrats are riding a massive surge of presidential campaign cash into 2020, boosting the party’s hopes of taking back the White House.

Their leading candidates for president faced criticism last year from party veterans alarmed by tepid early fundraising totals. But they finished up 2019 raking in cash from fired-up donors: The current Democratic presidential contenders and the Democratic National Committee combined raised over $450 million in the last year — more than President Donald Trump’s reelection machine brought in during that time.

[johnforbes]

We have seen a massive surge in Elkin's postings.

He appears to be hung over from the NY Eve party at a Frisco bath.

[RealJustme]

The Democratic National Committee has a money problem. And that could hurt its nominee’s chances of beating President Donald Trump in 2020.

In the first four months of 2019, the party spent more than it raised and added $3 million in new debt. In the same period, its Republican counterpart was stockpiling cash.

It figures that the DNC has spent more money than they brought it, it's the way they operate. In the mean time Trump has built up a war chest of over 100 million going into 2020.

[elklindo69]

The Democratic National Committee has a money problem. And that could hurt its nominee’s chances of beating President Donald Trump in 2020.

In the first four months of 2019, the party spent more than it raised and added $3 million in new debt. In the same period, its Republican counterpart was stockpiling cash.

It figures that the DNC has spent more money than they brought it, it's the way they operate. In the mean time Trump has built up a war chest of over 100 million going into 2020.

It doesn't matter how much they had. It only matters how much they have. I think you need some waders to walk around in your steaming bullshit.........

[johnforbes]

If the DNC had really been hacked in 2016, it would have turned over its servers to forensic experts.

It never did, but instead used a CrowdStrike report, and Mueller -- displaying zero interest in what happened -- relied also on the CrowdStrike report.

[elklindo69]

Maybe the Ukrainians have the server....just like Putin told Trump...........

[johnforbes]

Apparently the server is in many pieces.

The DNC did not dare let it be examined.

[elklindo69]

A server is typically a computer program. So how is it in pieces?

[johnforbes]

They were talking about a physical server in this case.

And it is apparently in pieces, and nobody -- not even esteemed "investigators" like Mueller -- had any interest in finding or examining it.

Why was Mueller utterly uninterested in learning what really happened in 2016?

Did his staff -- consisting entirely of Democrats -- have no interest?

[elklindo69]

How do know it was a physical server?

Trump was telling everybody that the Ukrainians had it? Even though Crowdstrike imaged the server and provided it to the FBI.

Johnnie you are so ignorant and amateurish that you can't even make up plausible bullshit.