- Tue Oct 29, 2019 7:26 pm
#120565
Then go in for the kill:
Your testimony as an Army Officer under oath, claims that the President "Demanded" the investigation, the transcript shows he said he would like for the investigation to take place, you do understand the difference don't you? Or are you pulling a "Schiff" changing what you heard to what you wanted to hear as Schiff did with the transcript?
"I was concerned by the call," Vindman's opening statement says. "I did not think it was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen, and I was worried about the implications for the U.S. government’s support of Ukraine."My Vindman, are you saying the transcript of the President's call is fabricated, if not please point out where the President DEMANDED the investigation!
Then go in for the kill:
Your testimony as an Army Officer under oath, claims that the President "Demanded" the investigation, the transcript shows he said he would like for the investigation to take place, you do understand the difference don't you? Or are you pulling a "Schiff" changing what you heard to what you wanted to hear as Schiff did with the transcript?