Political discussions about everything
#120226
^^^^^^ Geezus, what a moron.

RealTool never talks about what really happened. He only talks about what he believes MIGHT happen, even though it's made up stupid shit. After all, who can argue about something that hasn't happened? That's why RealTool feels safe in fantasy land but not in the real world.

When all is said and done, he can't talk about the facts. They make him look like an imbecile.
#120231
No, what I am saying is RealTool always starts these idiotic threads about stuff that hasn't happened.

For all you morons out there, that means it's partisan propaganda and not facts.

As that fantasy land is the same world sillydummy lives in, it makes perfect sense to him. ANYTHING to avoid facing the train wreck that is the Trump Administration.
#120233
No, what I am saying is RealTool always starts these idiotic threads about stuff that hasn't happened
I'd bet money in Vegas, the topics I outlined will be at least 80% of the debate. No matter what questions are asked, they will bring the conversation to those topics.

If Trump was there for the debate here's what they would ask Trump and what they would ask Biden:

CNN question for Trump: "Tell the American public, how your colluding with Ukraine to attack our election system is OK!"

CNN questioning Joe Biden: "Joe we know this has already been investigated and found to be a nothing burger, but some people are trying to make a big deal out of it, would you like to explain to those uninformed people, there's nothing to your dealings with Ukraine?'
#120240
Elkin, please stop your racist remarks about the skin tone of politicians.

Ukraine opted to reinvestigate the Bidens long before the current president was elected, and Ukraine only learned about the billion in aid long after, so there could NOT have been a quid pro quo even if the phone call suggested one, which it did NOT.

Meanwhile, Biden actually did confess to a quid pro quo on TV.
#120246
Bootygood will brag about how gay he is, and Spartacus will have to pretend he isn't despite the report that he assaulted a guy in a bathroom.

Liz Warren's big question-and-answer exchange the other night, the one about marriage, went viral, but we now know it was all planned and faked with one of her donors. Lieawatha...
#120248
johnforbes wrote: Tue Oct 15, 2019 5:55 pm Bootygood will brag about how gay he is, and Spartacus will have to pretend he isn't despite the report that he assaulted a guy in a bathroom.

Liz Warren's big question-and-answer exchange the other night, the one about marriage, went viral, but we now know it was all planned and faked with one of her donors. Lieawatha...
And Johnnie cracks open the closet door. It's OK....you can come out now. The log cabin republicans will welcome you with open arms. It's nothing to be ashamed of.

LMFAO!

:laugh:
#120252
Elkin made the point that many modern Democrats seem gay, and that is true.

Mayor Bootygood married some guy, and Spartacus reportedly went after some guy in a bathroom.

Liz Warren's big question-and-answer exchange the other night, the one about marriage, went viral, but we now know it was all planned and faked with one of her donors. Lieawatha...
#120255
johnny, ALL politicians practice their 'spontaneous' exchanges. To call them lies is ignorant and naive.

It's painful to watch Trump desperately trying to read the teleprompter when he is answering something that has been prepared for him. But you don't call HIM a liar when he reads you something he didn't come up with himself or even believe personally.

And after you keep criticizing people for calling Trump things like "Fake President" or "the Orange-skinned baboon" you come out with your childish "Liawatha" or "Pocohontas" or other idiotic stuff when it doesn't even apply. Warrern didn't lie. You just helplessly succumb to the partisan crap from your handlers.

You fucking hypocrite...
#120256
Liz Warren's big question-and-answer exchange the other night, the one about marriage, went viral
That was Warren's Hillary moment that will cause her tons of votes. You don't make fun of over 95% of Americans who aren't gay then slam straight men to play up to the gay community and far left without offending many of those 95%. That was her "deplorable" moment. I have a friend who was a Warren supporter until she chastised him for being a straight man.

Concerning last night's debate, worse in debate history!!!

You can bet Huma is getting Hillary's hospital van out of storage and ready for the road.
#120258
There is debate prep where all candidates practice answering various difficult questions they might face.

Clown is correct that that occurs, and occurs routinely.

However, Donna Brazile gave Hillary debate questions in advance while pretending to be a "journalist."

And Liz rehearsed that marriage question with a guy who donated many times to her campaign, then staged it to make it seem spontaneous.

Remember Susan Rice going on 5 Sunday talk shows to claim the Benghazi attack was a "spontaneous demonstration"?
#120260
Honestly, johnny, nobody thought Brazile was a "journalist." At least I didn't. Did you?

She was the Chair of the Democratic National Committee and stepped down when it became convenient so the debates could appear 'independent'. They never are, for either party. The parties can chose whomever they want to run. And they are free to stack the deck in favor of the person they want to run. They can give the questions in advance to anyone they want to. All this primary baloney is just for show. We don't get to choose. The parties choose who they run. We just act as advisors that they can listen to or not.

You really need to become less naive. It makes you too vulnerable to manipulation, and you seem only too happy to oblige them. Stop getting so indignant about the Democrats when they are doing exactly the same thing Republicans are doing and it doesn't bother you in the least when THEY do it.
#120264
It depends on how ya define it.

I keep hearing people in D.C. talking about "opinion journalists," and I suppose Brazile is that if ya stretch the definition.

But no, I never thought of her as a journalist but just as a political operator.

My problem with her on these shows is that you have one Left person, one Right person, they yell at each other, and the audience learns nothing about public policy.
Handling Crime in DC

Per the reliable Babylon Bee: "WASHINGTON, D[…]

"Obama-appointed Judge Engelmayer has rejecte[…]

All that we ask, on this fine forum, is that Clown[…]

Obliterated what?

Mr Forbes, after careful scrutiny of this thread, […]

Having the Clintons Testify

Having the Clintons testify about the Epstein mess[…]

Come on Elkin, if you had ever been there, you'd k[…]

Evidence from the Durham Annex

"Now evidence from the Durham annex proving t[…]

Remember Brooke Shields in her Calvin Klein Jeans?[…]