Political discussions about everything
#119619
Previously, the whistleblower form mandated direct knowledge -- not gossip.

Everybody knows that hearsay is not allowed.

This entire whistleblower event was planned and staged.

Just last month, the Intelligence Community Inspector General revised the protocol allowing the EXACT type of complaint now registered from the CIA whistleblower.

Brennan and/or his pals?
#119632
Of course, intelligence community personnel talking to each other about intelligence they have gathered is not "gossip" as partisan scumbag johnny knows quite well. It's their job description.

Various people gather intelligence and then talk about it with other intelligence people and an analyst who wasn't a direct witness to all of it puts the pieces together and tells superiors their opinions of what all the intelligence means.

Suddenly johnforbes wants to characterize and belittle the jobs of the CIA and the FBI and the NSA as just sitting around gossiping with each other. Why would that be, I wonder.
#119633
Clown, I understand that you have not had legal training and thus you don't know that hearsay has problems if you consider it as evidence.

But this means anybody with gossip can try to take down any president.

Don't you understand that this could easily be used to try to take down the next Democrat president too?

Say, I heard that Clown has green hair, so thus it must be credible and thus we need an investigation into the Clowntoker Green Hair Scandal.

This approach is insane, and my comments here are not partisan.
#119638
That memo which detailed Trump’s conversation with Zelensky and confirmed the allegations in the whistleblower’s complaint, is not hearsay evidence.

Therefore, the transcript of Trump’s call with Zelensky was non-hearsay and is admissable against Trump.

This fucking shit is not rocket science and John Forbes can't even brew up a pot of bullshit.

Johnnie....if you are going to cook up some bullshit....at least make it good bullshit.

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
#119639
johnny, I can understand that since you are nothing but a partisan hypocrite douche bag that you don't know jack shit about the facts of the whistle blower process.

Your bullshit about "gossip" is how an ignorant partisan moron would characterize the seven page complaint that went through review by the inspector general and others and found credible. There is NO danger whatsoever of purely partisan made up stupid shit of conservatives making it through the process and being labeled "credible" or "urgent" and thus taking down a Democrat President. It's made up stupid and irrelevant bullshit.

Why you hold Atkinson and Maguire in such contempt is beyond me. You take Trump's (draft dodger) word over that of a 24 year Navy Admiral and SEAL. You are just vile.
#119644
Why would I have any particularly soft view of Maguire? Wasn't he in college from 1970 to 1974, during the biggest war of his lifetime?

Sure. if he went through SEAL training, that is good, but then so are many of the other demanding military schools such as Ranger training.

Irrelevant matters aside, you don't want to pollute whistleblower stuff with mere gossip, which is what this was.

The IG said this person had "political bias" and favored a "rival" of Trump's and that he had NO DIRECT KNOWLEGE of what the hell he was talking about.

Gossip.
#119654
Why would you have any particularly soft view of Trump, johnny? Wasn't he dodging the draft from 1970 to 1974, during the biggest war of his lifetime?

Of course, Maguire had no way of knowing in 1970 that the war would not be waiting for him when he completed SEAL training. A Navy SEAL is a much more valuable combat asset than a sailor on a supply ship. But he supports Trump's military service who was too much a coward to clean a latrine or even show up. Yet johnforbes is critical of Maguire anyway.

And then johnforbes wonders why people would have no respect for loud-mouthed hypocritical veteran like himself who supports and takes the word of a lifelong liar and con man over an honorable career military man.
Handling Crime in DC

So how is the Left going to fight Trump on this on[…]

"Obama-appointed Judge Engelmayer has rejecte[…]

All that we ask, on this fine forum, is that Clown[…]

Obliterated what?

Mr Forbes, after careful scrutiny of this thread, […]

Having the Clintons Testify

Having the Clintons testify about the Epstein mess[…]

Come on Elkin, if you had ever been there, you'd k[…]

Evidence from the Durham Annex

"Now evidence from the Durham annex proving t[…]

Remember Brooke Shields in her Calvin Klein Jeans?[…]