[johnforbes]

Somebody who worked for Brennan, who was peddling the fake dossier (which he surely had to know was fake) to Senator Harry Reid?

[Clownkicker]

Well, OBVIOUSLY it would be wrong for a CIA agent to blow the whistle on what he believes is a n abuse of power, wouldn't it, johnny. Or isn't that what you're saying? If you would tell us what your point is, then we might understand what your point is, dummy.

And what does Brennan have to do with some guy who might have worked under him at one time? Are you saying you have had the same beliefs and ethics of every guy you ever worked for? Of course not, you dishonest turd. You and your pointless conservative innuendo. It's all you ever have because you lack the balls to simply say what you mean.

What is wrong with you? Do you actually think a guy is going to ruin his career for some guy he used to work for? Do you actually think anyone takes their whistle blowing that lightly? You're probably one of those dimwits who thinks women frivolously use abortion as simply convenient birth control.

[johnforbes]

Come on, he or she didn't believe that at all.

The complaint was amended to reflect that this person had no direct, firsthand knowledge of any of this, so that was surely at the behest of the attorney who realized that issue would be raised.

And the attorney worked with Hillary and Schumer, and donated to Biden.

This is just another Left Wing attempt at sedition -- the constant effort since 2016 to undo the election.

[RealJustme]

Someone broke the law by releasing classified sensitive information to the leaker who didn't have that access. Everyone who had access to the transcript has top secret clearances, which means they are subject to a polygraph at anytime as a condition of keeping their clearances. Trump's Chief of Staff hinted this morning that polygraphs are being arranged.

The polygraphs would be a good time to ask them all if they've ever released classified or sensitive information to anyone who doesn't have access. I'm betting over half of them would fail, especially the Obama hold overs.

Pass the popcorn.

[Clownkicker]

"Come on, he or she didn't believe that at all."-johnfibs

What the fuck would you know about what he believed or didn't believe, johnny?

"The complaint was amended to reflect that this person had no direct, firsthand knowledge of any of this,..."-johnflubs

No, he was the analyst who put all the many pieces together to discover the crime AND the cover up. No single first hand witness could do that.

You don't get to whine that your guy should get a free pass on his crimes just because he hides them well enough to elude detection by any single witness.

[sillydaddy]

Crime??...tpical of the libetards bullshit playbook. Guilty, always guilty....!


The whistleblower's complaint is just that...a complaint , an allegation...

"... I was not a direct witness to most of the events described. However, I found my colleagues’ accounts of these events to be credible because, in almost all cases, multiple officials recounted fact patterns that were consistent with one another. In addition, a variety of information consistent with these private accounts has been reported publicly...."

The rest of the document is full of..

It is unclear whether...
I do not know...

In order words he is talking out of his ass..

[elklindo69]

So Silly...why don't you explain why Trump stored those non secret transcripts with the Ukrainian president on a top - top secret server.

How can anybody believe Trump's nonsensical stupid shit?

[snakeoil]

What does it matter what he/she is if the facts are correct?

[Clownkicker]

Notice johnny can NEVER argue that the crime wasn't committed. He actually believes the crime WAS committed.

Invariably his position is that no one should have REVEALED the crime in the first place, and thus the criminal should be given a free pass for his crime on technical grounds.

And to further support his assertion of a legal education, you give johnforbes the facts to discredit his argument that even he can't dispute, but in his next breath he will continue to parrot the lie that was just debunked. johnforbes is incorrigible. He's a conservative.

That is the best evidence we have to date that johnforbes actually DID go to law school. He isn't interested in truth or justice or even reaality. He is only interested in arguing technicalities in order to get his guilty client off no matter what the cost to America.

[johnforbes]

No, I can speak for John, and he is wonderful.

John believes what he stated above, and -- I might add -- in articulate fashion.

[elklindo69]

When you think about it......based on the frequency with which Ghouliani keeps admitting to his and Trump’s crimes, he is as helpful as the actual whistleblower.

[RealJustme]

Someone broke the law by releasing classified sensitive information to the leaker who didn't have that access. Everyone who had access to the transcript has top secret clearances, which means they are subject to a polygraph at anytime as a condition of keeping their clearances. Trump's Chief of Staff hinted this morning that polygraphs are being arranged.

The polygraphs would be a good time to ask them all if they've ever released classified or sensitive information to anyone who doesn't have access. I'm betting over half of them would fail, especially the Obama hold overs.

Pass the popcorn.

[Clownkicker]

Since RealTool doesn't have the foggiest idea whether the whistle blower has top secret clearance or not, we can file that entire post of made up stupid shit right in the porcelain bus he drives most nights after work.

[johnforbes]

Previously, the whistleblower form mandated direct knowledge -- not gossip.

Everybody knows that hearsay is not allowed.

This entire whistleblower event was planned and staged.

Just last month, the Intelligence Community Inspector General revised the protocol allowing the EXACT type of complaint now registered from the CIA whistleblower.

Brennan and/or his pals?

[Clownkicker]

So it's johnforbes' position that Trump breaking the law isn't an impeachable crime because the intelligence community somehow tricked Trump into breaking the law and trying to cover it up.

What a moron.

[johnforbes]

Elkin, please don't refer to yourself as a "moron."

You are, but you don't want to run yourself down.

Just think of yourself as your teachers did in "Special Education."

[Clownkicker]

^^^^^^ See? johnflubs couldn't refute a thing I said, so he tries to distract from his idiocy by pointing his finger elsewhere.

He suddenly realized that he let slip his actual belief that Trump is just a fool who is easily duped by the intelligence community.

[johnforbes]

Reportedly the IG has now conceded that he changed the form BECAUSE of this so-called whistleblower.

This underscores the extent to which this was all a planned operation.

So who is this so-called whistleblower who has a "partisan bias" for one of Trump's "rivals"?

A basic part of our law is to confront your accuser.

Let him testify in public and under oath and let us all see.