[johnforbes]

The IG already said the whistleblower had a "political bias" in favor of a "rival" of Trump's, so this is NOT neutral. Also, this person had "no direct knowledge."

George Mason discussed whether the Constitution should allow kicking out a president for maladministration or if he isn't liked by some, but it was decided to go with high crimes and so on.

Also, the full transcript will emerge, the whistleblower can testify, and Pelosi can find out soon if her impeachment dreams are mere pipe dreams.

[RealJustme]

Trump set the bitches up and they took the bait!

Now Democrats can't turn back, they have openly declared they are going to remove Trump and they will fail. It's a one shot deal, once they fail they will be red faced and scorned by both liberals and conservatives, but for different reasons.

After they fail, Trump will be set loose to do what ever the hell he wants to do. Democrats shot their wad today.

[johnforbes]

Yes, and Pelosi must surely know better.

Dems said for two years it was horrible for Russia to have any influence, but that it was fine for Biden's son to get 50k per month from Ukraine.

[sillydaddy]

Yesterday the media was all excited about Pelosi giving the House the go ahead on impeachment inquiry...
But today the common message from the media is the " not so sure..."
CNN went so far as to say the Demos may have walked into a trap...

[RealJustme]

CNN went so far as to say the Demos may have walked into a trap

They did and even Comey warned the Dems it's a trap that they'll not be able to get out of.

[elklindo69]

The IG already said the whistleblower had a "political bias" in favor of a "rival" of Trump's, so this is NOT neutral. Also, this person had "no direct knowledge."

George Mason discussed whether the Constitution should allow kicking out a president for maladministration or if he isn't liked by some, but it was decided to go with high crimes and so on.

Also, the full transcript will emerge, the whistleblower can testify, and Pelosi can find out soon if her impeachment dreams are mere pipe dreams.

Now Johnnie just dropped a steaming load of bullshit from his dump truck onto the VW Political Board.

Leave it up to this numbnut to stink the place up.

Johnnie....don't you think it might have been a mistake to elect a dimwitted amateur mobster turned game show host to be president?

[johnforbes]

The IG already said the whistleblower had a "political bias" in favor of a "rival" of Trump's, so this is NOT neutral. Also, this person had "no direct knowledge."

George Mason discussed whether the Constitution should allow kicking out a president for maladministration or if he isn't liked by some, but it was decided to go with high crimes and so on.

Also, the full transcript has emerged and revealed nothing.

In 2018, 3 Dem senators urged Ukraine to investigate Trump.

Same thing.

[Clownkicker]

Sure johnny, "Same thing."

The only difference is that when the Ukrainian President said "I would also like to thank you for your great support in the area of defense." the very next sentence out of Trump's mouth was "I would like you to do us a favor though." The favor? To investigate a Trump political rival.

Trump said this after he had stopped the money Congress had appropriated to Ukraine's defense from being sent to Ukraine. Trump clearly threatened not to release the badly needed money until said "favor" was done for him.

I don't remember three members of Congress extorting Ukraine like that. Do you, johnny?

johnflubs needs to look up the mysterious words "quid pro quo" since his vast education apparently him completely ignorant.

[sillydaddy]

I don't remember three members of Congress extorting Ukraine like that. Do you, johnny?

"...While Democrats rush toward impeachment over an anonymous whistleblower complaint accusing President Donald Trump of requesting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, many have ignored the fact that last year, Senate Democrats wrote to Ukraine’s prosecutor general asking Ukrainian officials to investigate Trump.
In May of 2018, Sens. Bob Menendez, D-N.J., Dick Durbin, D-Ill., and Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., wrote to Ukraine’s Prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenko asking the Ukraine government to keep four investigations open related to the Mueller probe into Russian election interference in the U.S. and indicated that their support for foreign aid to Ukraine could be in jeopardy..."

https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/25/ ... 018/

No outrage when the Demos do it, eh.. Clown..!

[Clownkicker]

First of all, you didn't provide any evidence that Democrats suggested that foreign aid would be withheld if Ukraine didn't do what they wanted. You only have your handlers saying they did.

In this case Trump provided the evidence of his quid pro quo extortion.

But (just for shits and giggles) let's say the Democrats did the "same thing." They extorted Ukraine to get rid of a universally agreed upon corrupt government official who wasn't investigating Hunter Biden. But the Democrat Congressmen personally got nothing out of it other than a more secure Ukraine government that they would give the defense money to support. That's a good idea.

In this case, Trump expected personal political benefit (which is a crime) and the U.S. as a nation gets nothing for the extortion except a weakened national security with a weakened Ukraine.

Now silly, what do you think of Trump's asking for a "favor" before he would release the defense money?

[sillydaddy]

Where is the evidence Trump said he would withhold aid if the Ukraine President didn't help him?

[Clownkicker]

It's right in front of you in the transcript, dimwit. It's said exactly the way any crime boss extorts people.

Now go get a remedial English class and learn to grasp your mother tongue.

[Clownkicker]

...when the Ukrainian President said "I would also like to thank you for your great support in the area of defense." the very next sentence out of Trump's mouth was "I would like you to do us a favor though."

Do you even know what the word "though" means, silly?

The dictionary says it means "however (indicating that a factor qualifies or imposes restrictions on what was said previously)."

Look it up, fer cripes sake.

[RealJustme]

...when the Ukrainian President said "I would also like to thank you for your great support in the area of defense." the very next sentence out of Trump's mouth was "I would like you to do us a favor though."

So Trump gets thanks for helping Ukraine for his "great support" of their defense means Trump threatened to not support their defense?

[elklindo69]

...when the Ukrainian President said "I would also like to thank you for your great support in the area of defense." the very next sentence out of Trump's mouth was "I would like you to do us a favor though."

So Trump gets thanks for helping Ukraine for his "great support" of their defense means Trump threatened to not support their defense?

Can someone translate this gibberish into a format that is readable by humans....

[johnforbes]

Clown asked me to look into the words "quid pro quo."

Given my 3 years of Latin, I know very well what they mean.

They translate to: "Clown is a nutty leftist."

[elklindo69]

Ghouliani is Trump's new Michael Cohen....however...he seems to be an amateur "fixer."