[RealJustme]

They're all going to start dropping out like flies now.

[Clownkicker]

Of course they are, dimwit. There are 25 of them. If they were all Republicans running for president, they would begin dropping like flies in just the same manner. Every Democrat expects it to begin at this point. In fact, they are looking forward to it.

What is wrong with you Trump idiots? How can you be so out of touch with reality? And how can you make everyday normal statistics into a partisan issue?

[elklindo69]

So what Justme....what were you expecting?

[RealJustme]

Of course they are, dimwit

No duh, the first debate exposed how stupid they are. Dropping out as the debates just start is unheard of...I'm betting Biden's people let him know he one of the people they have serious shit on.

[Clownkicker]

No it isn't "unheard of" dummy. It happens all the time.

Criminy, it's like they all live in a protective propaganda bubble.

[johnforbes]

Clownslacker has dropped out of many things, including high school.

[Clownkicker]

johnforbes has graduated from many schools, but somehow is still grossly ignorant of economic fundamentals, including what "socialism" means.

[sillydaddy]

Swalwell must have misread the Demos outrage of wanting
tighter regulatiosns on guns, and believed all the bullshit posted by that asshole, Hogg...
Because Swalwell put his political career on the line and ran on a gun control platform.
The liberals didn't even give him a second look..
The real funny thing is...
a Muslim named Aisha Wahab is now running for his former seat in the House..

[Clownkicker]

That's the funny thing about democracy, sillydummy. When you run on a platform nobody likes, nobody votes for you.

How many years have you been a voting conservative and you still find that basic truth incomprehensible?

Conservatives call that "Being disloyal to your party" and then do what they're told, regardless of how horrendous or hypocritical the policy.

Liberals just call it "The system working as it should" and then they vote their conscience.

See how that works, silly?

[RealJustme]

AOC sweet heart drops out, he was the most liberal of the liberals and his own party shut him down.

[sillydaddy]

Liberals just call it "The system working as it should" and then they vote their conscience.

Really..!!!!
Then why did the Demos want to abolish the Electoral College right after Trump won the election?

[Clownkicker]

Because they want "The People" to elect our President, obviously, sillydummy.

If you knew who actually elects your President and that your vote doesn't count, you would be outraged. But ignorance is bliss, as your gleeful comment proves.

If you looked into the Electoral College, you might just learn that there are different rules in different states as to who gets to be electors and who they may or must vote for. It's a ridiculous arbitrary system. It's what allows a clown who gets 3 million fewer votes to win the Presidency. It's a slack in the face to every voter in this country.

It's an antiquated relic of a time when people weren't universally educated, news traveled slowly, and the wealthy weren't about to turn over such an important position to someone elected by you and me. Being a conservative, you hate the liberal idea that the majority should rule. You want an unConstitutional plutocracy, as you have argued with RealTool.

[RealJustme]

You want some cheese with that whine clown?

[Clownkicker]

I got everything I wanted, which was to shut you up about all the nonsense you have been posting here.

You can't refute a thing I said. You've got nothin', as always.

[johnforbes]

I refute it thus, by kicking a large stone much as Dr. Johnson did to refute Berkeley.

[Clownkicker]

That's what I said, johnny, you clown have nothin', as always.

johnny's futile 'kicking' of this large stone is pretty much the same thing as what Sisyphus faced for the last few millennia.

He will never learn.

[RealJustme]

You can't refute a thing I said

Clown that's because you have posted anything of substance. Why should I refute your whining? I just call it out.

[Clownkicker]

Obviously I need to refresh you memory of the substance you can't refute, Tool.

Here it is again:

Because they want "The People" to elect our President, obviously, sillydummy.

If you knew who actually elects your President and that your vote doesn't count, you would be outraged. But ignorance is bliss, as your gleeful comment proves.

If you looked into the Electoral College, you might just learn that there are different rules in different states as to who gets to be electors and who they may or must vote for. It's a ridiculous arbitrary system. It's what allows a clown who gets 3 million fewer votes to win the Presidency. It's a slack in the face to every voter in this country.

It's an antiquated relic of a time when people weren't universally educated, news traveled slowly, and the wealthy weren't about to turn over such an important position to someone elected by you and me. Being a conservative, you hate the liberal idea that the majority should rule. You want an unConstitutional plutocracy, as you have argued with RealTool.

So now you can stop whining about your inability to refute a thing I said.
Remember, you actually started a thread about how you believed those with the most money should have more than one vote, verifying your support for a plutocracy and your hate for our Constitution.
So when you have something else of substance to offer, get back to us.
Which means I can take a refreshing nap without any interruption from you.

[johnforbes]

People are not universally educated today.

If you doubt my assertion, just look at the postings on the Interwebs.

[RealJustme]

Remember, you actually started a thread about how you believed those with the most money should have more than one vote, verifying your support for a plutocracy and your hate for our Constitution.

No I didn't, go ahead and bite clown.

[Clownkicker]

^^^^^^^^ And RealTool folds again, completely unable to refute anything I said.

[sillydaddy]

Because they want "The People" to elect our President, obviously, sillydummy.

If you knew who actually elects your President and that your vote doesn't count, you would be outraged. But ignorance is bliss, as your gleeful comment proves.

That's what losers would say.....
But you already know why allowing the popular vote to determine the Presidential election would not be
fair to States with low populations, like Wyoming for example.....
Don't be blissfully ignorant, Clown..I know that may be a giant leap for you...but try

[Clownkicker]

Low-population states also have a low number of electoral votes, dimwit.

It's the Senate that is the great equalizer for population variances.

Don't be blissfully ignorant, sillydummy..I know that may be a giant leap for you...but try