Political discussions about everything
By elklindo69
#110754
Just imagine if the President Email Lady's daughter who was not elected went out and used her own private email account to conduct government business?

Hannity would have been shitting cinder blocks and conservatards would have been falling all over each other in a mad dash to hold hearings...

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

WASHINGTON (AP) — A public official is said to have conducted government business via private email. Sound familiar?

This time, it’s Ivanka Trump, President Donald Trump’s daughter and White House adviser.

Ivanka Trump sent hundreds of emails about government business from a personal email account last year to White House aides, Cabinet members and her assistant, many in violation of public records rules, The Washington Post has reported.

News of her email practices spawned accusations of hypocrisy. Donald Trump mercilessly criticized Hillary Clinton, his 2016 Democratic presidential rival, for her use of a private email server during her time as secretary of state under President Barack Obama. Trump dubbed her “Crooked Hillary” and repeatedly said — including to her face at one point — that she belonged in jail.
User avatar
By namngulfvet
#110755
I think you mean Crooked Hillary
Elk-doo-fus (Elkdoofus) (Non) (Socialist term meaning) to babble incoherently; to make no sense; to show ones ignorance; Has no idea of what freedom means; Meaning they can not read nor comprehend.

Talking with an (Elk-doo-fus) is like carrying on a conversation with a pile of pigeon crap. It makes no sense and it stinks.

Elk-doof-us; is used by Socialist to describe how ignorant they are about conservative Presidents or what a great economy American has.
Elk-doo-fus has an IQ of 3.5
By sillydaddy
#110756
"... of public records rules....
meaning they were not classified....
Elk you need to go back and read again why Hillary got into trouble with her emails...
and unless you have graduated to ultra idiot, you will see and agree there is a difference.... :o
By sillydaddy
#110757
and the situation with Ivanka now...does not exonerate Hillary ..she is still Crooked Hillary" :lol: :lol: :lol:
By johnforbes
#110759
When was Ivanka Sec of State?

Did she place classified material on a private server, then delete 33,000 emails under subpoena?
User avatar
By namngulfvet
#110764
You know what baffles me. Is Eldoofus wants illegals to roll across the borders. Hes not sure why they should be here but because he was told we need em he supports that.
At the same time hes paying for all their housing, food, schooling, medical while at the same time he has to pay for his own families food, housing, medical ect, ect...
Elk still has outstanding school loans hes going to be paying on for years. In the mean time some illegal is scarfing up his (elkdoofus) money, to pay his way through school. By the time this illegal has graduated from collage hes going to be debit free. step into a good job that hes taking away from Elkdoofus kids.
And to top it off this same illegal Elkdoofus has been paying on for years is now making political decisions for Elk.

Its no wonder illegals love our liberals up here. what racket right Elkdoofus. Your giving them the store but you still have to pay for your own shit...talk about brilliant :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
By johnforbes
#110767
Yes, imagine somebody trying to tell Democrat JFK that the U.S. should allow in any poor, uneducated person who decides to break our law.

JFK was a hawk on national security, and he wanted a strong economy. He was not a sap like modern Dems.

Modern Democrats hate America, and want to replace whites and Christians and legal taxpaying citizens with millions MORE illegal immigrants.
By elklindo69
#110797
So Miss daddy's lil girl Ivanka, because when I need to ensure that those government emails are being sent securely, I turn to the failed fake handbag designer if that's what we're charitably calling it.

Then Ivanka said she didn’t know it would be a problem to use a personal email address...

The hyprocricy is mindboggling....

:lol:
User avatar
By namngulfvet
#110801
elklindo69 wrote:So Miss daddy's lil girl Ivanka, because when I need to ensure that those government emails are being sent securely, I turn to the failed fake handbag designer if that's what we're charitably calling it.

Then Ivanka said she didn’t know it would be a problem to use a personal email address...

The hyprocricy is mindboggling....

:lol:
SPEAKING OF HYPOCRITES AND LOOK WHO SHOWS UP.. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Elk-doo-fus (Elkdoofus) (Non) (Socialist term meaning) to babble incoherently; to make no sense; to show ones ignorance; Has no idea of what freedom means; Meaning they can not read nor comprehend.

Talking with an (Elk-doo-fus) is like carrying on a conversation with a pile of pigeon crap. It makes no sense and it stinks.

Elk-doof-us; is used by Socialist to describe how ignorant they are about conservative Presidents or what a great economy American has.
Elk-doo-fus has an IQ of 3.5
By elklindo69
#110802
I suppose the "respectable" Republicon Party, which famously avoids hypocrisy at all costs, will call for a full and swift investigation into the usage of private emails for official guvmint use by daddy's lil gurl...because let’s be honest, these are the most honorable folks we’ve ever encountered.

Right dumbfuck......

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
By sillydaddy
#110815
Well Elk...sounds to me that if Ivanka is guilty, as you say, of email abuse and she was only an advisor and
didn't try to hide her work...
then Hillary is guilty too... is she not? :o
User avatar
By namngulfvet
#110819
sillydaddy wrote:Well Elk...sounds to me that if Ivanka is guilty, as you say, of email abuse and she was only an advisor and
didn't try to hide her work...
then Hillary is guilty too... is she not? :o
Im with you Silly. If Ivanka goes to jail then she should be bunking with Hillary. Right Elk. whats good for one is good for the other! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
By Clownkicker
#110822
Im with you Silly and namandgulfdumbfuck. If Ivanka doesn't go to jail then Hillary shouldn't either. Right Elk. whats good for one is good for the other! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
By johnforbes
#110823
Dems are being very foolish in going after Ivanka on this.

Should she have done it? Of course not, but this merely invites attention to Comey -- a lawyer who was head of the n' FBI -- doing it.

And Hillary used hammers to pound her cell phones to bits on the floor of the State Dept, and she deleted THIRTY THREE THOUSAND EMAILS UNDER SUBPOENA.
User avatar
By namngulfvet
#110827
Clownkicker wrote:Im with you Silly and namandgulfdumbfuck. If Ivanka doesn't go to jail then Hillary shouldn't either. Right Elk. whats good for one is good for the other! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
I think Hillary should set the example and go to prison for life first. Then we can discuss Ivanka ..Right Elk
By sillydaddy
#110828
Im with you Silly and namandgulfdumbfuck. If Ivanka doesn't go to jail then Hillary shouldn't either. Right Elk. whats good for one is good for the other!
Comey exonerated Hillary and she paid him back by calling him a liar.......
and for that, Comey threw her under the bus, on the train tracks , and over side, with that letter
that reopened the investigation....killing her chances of becoming President..

Is Hillary going to jail?....why?.....She's already doing Life...! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
By elklindo69
#110829
So the Republicans spent the better part of 20 years talking about Bill Clinton’s BJ, but they went silent after Trump got caught banging his paid mistresses.

Then the Republicans spent the better part of 3 years saying Hillary should go to prison for sending private emails, but they went silent as Ivanka got caught doing the same.
By Clownkicker
#110831
Wow, it's really curious how Republicans are backpedaling on the "Lock her up!" thing.

Suddenly they have no interest in Administration staff using private email servers for sensitive government business.

It's almost like they are merely partisan hypocrites or something.
User avatar
By namngulfvet
#110832
So the Republicans spent the better part of 20 years talking about Bill Clinton’s BJ, but they went silent after Trump got caught banging his paid mistresses.
Did he do it while in office? And did he lie about it?

Wow, it's really curious how Republicans are backpedaling on the "Lock her up!" thing.

Suddenly they have no interest in Administration staff using private email servers for sensitive government business.

It's almost like they are merely partisan hypocrites or something.
Why should we care when everyday you defending Hillary. Now all the sudden with a lack of information you want tp put Ivanka in prison for doing less then Hillary.
By Clownkicker
#110834
"Why should we care when everyday you defending Hillary. Now all the sudden with a lack of information you want tp put Ivanka in prison for doing less then Hillary."-namandgulflyingsackofshit

Why can't you make a post that contains at least ONE THING that is true? I haven't said or done any of that. You made it up.

This sort of 100% made up stupid shit is just more lies from hypocritical Trump supporters.
User avatar
By namngulfvet
#110836
Clownkicker wrote:"Why should we care when everyday you defending Hillary. Now all the sudden with a lack of information you want tp put Ivanka in prison for doing less then Hillary."-namandgulflyingsackofshit

Why can't you make a post that contains at least ONE THING that is true? I haven't said or done any of that. You made it up.

This sort of 100% made up stupid shit is just more lies from hypocritical Trump supporters.
Sure Clown you never make up anything... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
By johnforbes
#110837
Did Ivanka set up a private server and put it in a bathroom? No.

Did she delete any email? No.

Did she delete 33,000 emails under congressional subpoena, then BleachBit the server? No, but Hillary did.
User avatar
By namngulfvet
#110839
johnforbes wrote:Did Ivanka set up a private server and put it in a bathroom? No.

Did she delete any email? No.

Did she delete 33,000 emails under congressional subpoena, then BleachBit the server? No, but Hillary did.
Along with that did Ivanka bash her phones or scrub the servers or.......
By elklindo69
#110840
So let's get this straight....the conservatard outrage over Hillary’s emails was never about emails. We are seeing this now that daddy's lil princess dipshit has been caught in her own email scandal....
By Clownkicker
#110847
"Did Ivanka set up a private server and put it in a bathroom? No."-johnflubs

But that isn't what the statute you keep referencing says, is it, johnny. For some reason you are now pretending the statute criminalizes the private server and not the posting of government emails to a private server, which Ivanka did.

"Did she delete any email? No."-johnfibs

You have no idea whether she deleted any emails. You made it up.

"Did she delete 33,000 emails under congressional subpoena, then BleachBit the server? No,..."-johnflubs

Until she is threatened with investigation, we won't know if she will do that, johnny.

So we should start an investigation into her and find out, shouldn't we.
User avatar
By namngulfvet
#110850
Clownkicker wrote:"Did Ivanka set up a private server and put it in a bathroom? No."-johnflubs

But that isn't what the statute you keep referencing says, is it, johnny. For some reason you are now pretending the statute criminalizes the private server and not the posting of government emails to a private server, which Ivanka did.

"Did she delete any email? No."-johnfibs

You have no idea whether she deleted any emails. You made it up.

"Did she delete 33,000 emails under congressional subpoena, then BleachBit the server? No,..."-johnflubs

Until she is threatened with investigation, we won't know if she will do that, johnny.

So we should start an investigation into her and find out, shouldn't we.
Then why didnt she turn it all over to investigators Clown. She did bleach her server, she did bash her phones this has all been proven. Yet all you can do is throw your puppet spin on it Lot Lizard.
By Clownkicker
#110852
Is it a crime to bleach a private server, dimwit? Of course not. People do it all the time.

Is it a crime to smash a private cell phone? Of course not.

You cannot convict someone because you think they did something suspicious.

You only get to charge someone with a crime if it is on the books as a crime, dumbfuck. Try to stick to the actual criminal statute johnforbes is so concerned about that Milania also violated.

Treat everyone equally, right, dumbfuck?

"LOCK--HER--UP! LOCK--HER-UP!"
By johnforbes
#110854
No innocent person would delete 33,000 emails under subpoena, then BleachBit the server.

And it is ILLEGAL (18 USC 793) to put classified material on a private server, as Hillary did.

Comey knew that, and he knew he had used private email, and he knew he didn't want Trump to win, so he let Hillary skate free using a fake investigation of her.
By elklindo69
#110861
Wel you know what....there is nothing that screams entitled, stupid and hypocritical more than using private email to conduct guvmint business.

Especially when your daddy made it a foundation of a virtual non stop criticism of his political opponent...
By johnforbes
#110863
It is even more puzzling because Ivanka had to know that Democrats hate Trump. They don't just disagree with him, the loathe and detest him.

Democrats could not accept their 2016 loss, and their hypocrisy is mindboggling because the debates BEGAN with Democrat "journalists" demanding that Trump accept his inevitable loss to Hillary.

Even though Ivanka has kids and business interests of her own (lot on her plate), it is hard to understand why she didn't pay better attention inasmuch as this issue was all over the news.

But the Dems are foolish to pound away at this because it merely invites attention to Comey using private email. Really, the head of the FBI doesn't know better?

And it invites more scrutiny of Hillary, a Yale-educated lawyer, wife of a president, a senator herself, a Sec of State, and despite knowing very well it was wrong she went ahead and set up the private server.

And why? Surely to destroy her own evidentiary trail (which she later did).
User avatar
By namngulfvet
#110870
Clownkicker wrote:Is it a crime to bleach a private server, dimwit? Of course not. People do it all the time.

Is it a crime to smash a private cell phone? Of course not.

You cannot convict someone because you think they did something suspicious.

You only get to charge someone with a crime if it is on the books as a crime, dumbfuck. Try to stick to the actual criminal statute johnforbes is so concerned about that Milania also violated.

Treat everyone equally, right, dumbfuck?

"LOCK--HER--UP! LOCK--HER-UP!"
When its all government property Clown that makes it illegal your moron. But you could care less. You love defending this crooked ass liberal slut..Show us all again and again how much you hate this country
By Clownkicker
#110874
"When its all government property Clown that makes it illegal..."-namandgulfdumbfuck

So which is it, dumbfuck? Did Hillary have a private server as johnforbes says, or did she install a government server as you claim, in which case she didn't break the law, did she? You can't have it both ways, dimwit.

"You love defending this crooked ass liberal slut.."-namandgulfdumbfuck

Nowhere did I defend anyone, you imbecile. I'm just spelling out your hypocrisy for you. I've taken no sides on this thread.
If you were literate, you would already know this. But you're an ignoramus, so you believe all sorts of made up stupid shit.

"Show us all again and again how much you hate this country"-namandgulftraitor

I can't possibly show you even once, let alone "again and again" because that is just more of your made up stupid shit.
User avatar
By namngulfvet
#110884
So which is it, dumbfuck? Did Hillary have a private server as johnforbes says, or did she install a government server as you claim, in which case she didn't break the law, did she? You can't have it both ways, dimwit.
She had a private server with Gov Document and Gov emails on it dimwit. she broke the law yet you continue to defend her and her communist ways.. You cant have it both ways traitor boy..
Play all the word games you want the bottom line is your a pile of shit and fucking traitor lot lizard.
By Clownkicker
#110885
"She had a private server with Gov Document and Gov emails on it dimwit."-namandgulfdumbfuck

We're talking about Ivanka, right? I can't tell which one you are referencing with that comment. :lol:

"she broke the law yet you continue to defend her and her communist ways.."-namandgulfdumbfuck

So are we talking about Hillary or Ivanka? Either way, I haven't defended either of them. Why do you keep saying that?

"You cant have it both ways traitor boy.."-namandgulfdumbfuck

Again, we're talking about you, right? We must be. You want to lock Hillary up and let Ivanka skate free.
You keep trying to have it both ways, while I only want all people treated the same under the law.
By johnforbes
#110887
Given the publicity surrounding what Hillary did with her email, which was clearly illegal, it is puzzling that Ivanka would do that.

She shouldn't have, but Dems are being very foolish by trying to set up a false equivalency because it merely makes them and Hillary look bad.

Ivanka was NOT Sec of State, and her email was not under subpoena, and she did not delete anything, nor did she BleachBit the server.

Nor did she have staffers go to a hardware store, buy hammer, and hammer her cell phones to bits on the floor of the State Dept.
By Clownkicker
#110899
"Ivanka was NOT Sec of State, and her email was not under subpoena, and she did not delete anything, nor did she BleachBit the server."-johnflubs

None of which has anything to do with the statute you keep claiming Hillary violated even as you pretend Ivanka didn't violate it, johnny.
User avatar
By namngulfvet
#110900
Clownkicker wrote:"She had a private server with Gov Document and Gov emails on it dimwit."-namandgulfdumbfuck

We're talking about Ivanka, right? I can't tell which one you are referencing with that comment. :lol:

"she broke the law yet you continue to defend her and her communist ways.."-namandgulfdumbfuck

So are we talking about Hillary or Ivanka? Either way, I haven't defended either of them. Why do you keep saying that?

"You cant have it both ways traitor boy.."-namandgulfdumbfuck

Again, we're talking about you, right? We must be. You want to lock Hillary up and let Ivanka skate free.
You keep trying to have it both ways, while I only want all people treated the same under the law.
Thanks for admitting you cant read let alone understand or comprehend. Its no wonder your a dead beat union slug. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
By elklindo69
#110901
Hey dumbfuck....

Just out of my curiousity...how come the conservatard email task force isn't concerned about daddy's lil failed shoe business gurl sending government emails from a personal email address?
User avatar
By namngulfvet
#110904
elklindo69 wrote:Hey dumbfuck....

Just out of my curiousity...how come the conservatard email task force isn't concerned about daddy's lil failed shoe business gurl sending government emails from a personal email address?
Go crawl back into your bottle with Clown, Elk.
User avatar
By namngulfvet
#110911
sillydaddy wrote:Elk...just likes to howl into the wind.... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
I think its more like howling up Clowns asshole to watch it pucker
User avatar
By RealJustme
#110939
Ivanka Trump sent hundreds of emails about government business from a personal email account last year to White House aides, Cabinet members and her assistant, many in violation of public records rules, The Washington Post has reported.
The Washington Post has backed off of their original story, explaining their source has since provided conflicting information concerning how they learned of the emails or contents.
By johnforbes
#110942
The Washington Post was a pro-Democrat paper under Meyer and Katherine Graham.

It only investigates Repubs, NOT Dems.

It has never, and will never, investigate the stunning corruption of the 2016 campaign, with a fake investigation by Comey where Hillary was let go 3 mos before there was even witness interviewing.
By elklindo69
#110949
johnforbes wrote:Ivanka did not move classified material to a private server.

Hillary did, and that is against the law.
What does "move classified material to a private server" supposed to mean?

You don't know what Trump sent via email. You're just making shit up...
By sillydaddy
#110960
What does "move classified material to a private server" supposed to mean?

What Hillary did ...with a cloth or something....! :o :o
By johnforbes
#110971
Move classified material from a secure location to a private server, that means what it means.

It is what Hillary did, and it is against the Espionage Act.

Don't blame me; I didn't write that law.
By elklindo69
#110986
johnforbes wrote:Move classified material from a secure location to a private server, that means what it means.

It is what Hillary did, and it is against the Espionage Act.

Don't blame me; I didn't write that law.
So how was the material moved?
Trump Not Implicated

Unsurprisingly, johnforbes is so dense that he doe[…]

Obliterated what?

"Good idea to clean out some of those intel f[…]

Handling Crime in DC

^^^^^^^Look at 'im flail when he realizes that he […]

Footlong Felon

"Well, the best thing about Mr Forbes is his […]

Thoughts on this news story from the Babylon Bee: […]

Secret Slut

My wife has been in great shape this Summer and ha[…]

"Obama-appointed Judge Engelmayer has rejecte[…]

All that we ask, on this fine forum, is that Clown[…]