Page: No Evidence Before

Page: No Evidence Before#107948

By johnforbes - Mon Sep 17, 2018 8:11 am

- Mon Sep 17, 2018 8:11 am #107948

Per Page, there was no evidence at all to support the Russia allegations before the leaked material Comey gave to that professor.

He leaked to the media, as Comey wanted, and then Comey got the special counsel he wanted.

This was all completely corrupt, and all for partisan purposes.

Re: Page: No Evidence Before#107950

By Clownkicker - Mon Sep 17, 2018 8:45 am

- Mon Sep 17, 2018 8:45 am #107950

No, dummy. Trump was the one who forced the inappropriate meeting alone with Comey. Even a partisan weasel like you has to admit the meeting alone should not have taken place. It was to keep the facts private so there would be no witnesses to Trump's obstruction.

Comey (not being a stupid as you are) knew Trump was going to destroy Comey's image and reputation for refusing to play along with the obstruction, so he took preemptive steps to mitigate it. The only way to stop Trump from lying about him was to put the facts out in public.

Everyone has a right to protect themselves from corrupt men, johnny.

The only thing you said that was true is that "This was all completely corrupt, and all for partisan purposes."
Yes, Trump is the one who is completely corrupt and partisan. What would you have done in Comey's position, johnny? Simply allow yourself to be destroyed?

Re: Page: No Evidence Before#107953

By johnforbes - Mon Sep 17, 2018 8:53 am

- Mon Sep 17, 2018 8:53 am #107953

Nonsense.

A president can meet alone with any person.

Bill Clinton often met alone for sex with interns, as did JFK, and FDR, and Harding, etc.

Re: Page: No Evidence Before#107956

By Clownkicker - Mon Sep 17, 2018 9:25 am

- Mon Sep 17, 2018 9:25 am #107956

Yes, a president CAN meet with anyone alone, but that doesn't mean he should, and you know it.
A president shouldn't meet alone with a Russian president either, without staff to record what transpires. Only amateurs or corrupt people do that.

Trump should not have met with Comey alone. Sessions should have been there. And there is absolutely no legitimate reason to keep Sessions out of the meeting. Which leaves only the illegitimate reasons to do so. The reasons Comey understood too well. Use your head, dummy.

But go ahead, make your case to the contrary. Expound on the many noble and virtuous reasons there should be no witnesses to the workings of your government.

Re: Page: No Evidence Before#107963

By RealJustme - Mon Sep 17, 2018 2:05 pm

- Mon Sep 17, 2018 2:05 pm #107963

Trump should not have met with Comey alone.

If you knew anything about leadership and management, good leaders do hold one on one meetings with their department heads. If you're meeting with one of your leaders for a one on one you don't bring their managers in to listen to what's said...that stifles an open exchange and you only hear what that person's manager what that person to say.

Re: Page: No Evidence Before#107965

By elklindo69 - Mon Sep 17, 2018 2:21 pm

- Mon Sep 17, 2018 2:21 pm #107965

RealJustme wrote:
Trump should not have met with Comey alone.
If you knew anything about leadership and management, good leaders do hold one on one meetings with their department heads. If you're meeting with one of your leaders for a one on one you don't bring their managers in to listen to what's said...that stifles an open exchange and you only hear what that person's manager what that person to say.

A one on one with Trump would make anybody cringe.

No wonder why Omarosa recorded all of those interactions....

:lol:

Re: Page: No Evidence Before#107975

By sillydaddy - Mon Sep 17, 2018 3:56 pm

- Mon Sep 17, 2018 3:56 pm #107975

No one wants to be one on one with Omarosa….
even Whoopi was careful to choose her words with her on "The View".. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Page: No Evidence Before#107978

By johnforbes - Mon Sep 17, 2018 4:24 pm

- Mon Sep 17, 2018 4:24 pm #107978

If no president should meet alone with Putin, why did Hillary and Obama both do it?

Hillary bragged about her "alone time" with Vlad.

Re: Page: No Evidence Before#107983

By Clownkicker - Mon Sep 17, 2018 4:30 pm

- Mon Sep 17, 2018 4:30 pm #107983

johnny, Hillary isn't President. Why can't conservatives understand that?

But as Secretary of State, she had the necessary staff with her recording the meeting.

And Obama also did it with the usual staff on hand to record the meeting.

Trump went in with only his interpreter. Our narrative of the meeting all comes from the Kremlin, just the way Republicans like it.

Re: Page: No Evidence Before#108009

By johnforbes - Mon Sep 17, 2018 6:55 pm

- Mon Sep 17, 2018 6:55 pm #108009

I'll be glad to read the transcripts of those meetings.

Where is the link?

Re: Page: No Evidence Before#108013

By Clownkicker - Tue Sep 18, 2018 12:16 am

- Tue Sep 18, 2018 12:16 am #108013

There is no link, of course, but all you need to do is go online on your classified secure computer into the government computer system. Next you enter your security clearance code to gain access to classified materials. Then you click on State Department and look for the search feature to enter the date of the meeting with Putin. Et voilà!

It's pretty simple, really.

Re: Page: No Evidence Before#108018

By namngulfvet - Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:38 am

- Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:38 am #108018

Clownkicker wrote:There is no link, of course, but all you need to do is go online on your classified secure computer into the government computer system. Next you enter your security clearance code to gain access to classified materials. Then you click on State Department and look for the search feature to enter the date of the meeting with Putin. Et voilà!

It's pretty simple, really.

Of course there no link. How can you have a link to your Asshole..

Re: Page: No Evidence Before#108020

By johnforbes - Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:00 am

- Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:00 am #108020

So Clown just made it all up?

Re: Page: No Evidence Before#108026

By Clownkicker - Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:07 am

- Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:07 am #108026

"How can you have a link to your Asshole.."-namangulfdumbfuck

namandgulf, you of all people here, with your anal fixation and shit obsession know you CAN and DO have a "link to your Asshole."
I have just been notified of this curious item that came up on your last Amazon shipment bill: https://www.refinery29.com/best-anal-be ... -butt-play

Now, please spare us any further details about your revolting masturbatory private life.

Re: Page: No Evidence Before#108027

By namngulfvet - Tue Sep 18, 2018 1:51 pm

- Tue Sep 18, 2018 1:51 pm #108027

Clownkicker wrote:"How can you have a link to your Asshole.."-namangulfdumbfuck

namandgulf, you of all people here, with your anal fixation and shit obsession know you CAN and DO have a "link to your Asshole."
I have just been notified of this curious item that came up on your last Amazon shipment bill: https://www.refinery29.com/best-anal-be ... -butt-play

Now, please spare us any further details about your revolting masturbatory private life.

Is it just me or has anyone else noticed ClownLickers been pounding on his key board like a little spoiled kid who cant get his way.. Making false accusations spewing blatant lies. Im betting he and Elkpoop are spewing all over each other..Then licking each other clean...

Re: Page: No Evidence Before#108028

By namngulfvet - Tue Sep 18, 2018 1:52 pm

- Tue Sep 18, 2018 1:52 pm #108028

Clownkicker wrote:"How can you have a link to your Asshole.."-namangulfdumbfuck

namandgulf, you of all people here, with your anal fixation and shit obsession know you CAN and DO have a "link to your Asshole."
I have just been notified of this curious item that came up on your last Amazon shipment bill: https://www.refinery29.com/best-anal-be ... -butt-play

Now, please spare us any further details about your revolting masturbatory private life.

FYI ClownLicker your famous for pulling shit out of your asshole and posting as facts..