Clownkicker wrote::lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Is this the best you could come with...you think there is only ONE typo? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
You proved my point, dimwit.
The fact that you haven't the foggiest idea what Lisa Page actually said was already a given. You only think what your handlers told you to think about it.
Oh its this is going to hurt so good when it comes out...
Lisa Page testimony: Collusion still unproven by time of Mueller's special counsel appointment
More than nine months after the FBI opened its highly classified counterintelligence investigation into alleged coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia, FBI lawyer Lisa Page said investigators still could not say whether there was collusion, according to a transcript of Page's recent closed-door deposition reviewed by Fox News.
"I think this represents that even as far as May 2017, we still couldn't answer the question," Page said.
Page was responding to Republican Rep. John Ratcliffe of Texas, who wanted more information about a May 2017 text where Page, and her then colleague and lover FBI agent Peter Strzok discussed the merits of joining Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team.
Page sat for the transcribed interview before the House Judiciary and Oversight committees in mid-July as part of a joint congressional investigation into the Justice Department's handling of the Russia and Clinton email probes.
According to the transcript, Page stopped mid-answer."...sorry. Can I consult with counsel? I'm sorry. I need to consult with FBI counsel for a moment."
Sections of the transcript reviewed by Fox show Ratcliffe pursued the line of questioning at least three more times, and Page provided varying answers.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09 ... tment.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
this is all going to be so embarrassing for you libturds