[johnforbes]

"There is no serious person out there who would suggest somehow that you could even rig America's elections. There's no evidence that that has happened in the past or that there are instances in which that will happen this time."

[Clownkicker]

As some dimwit here often says--"Thoughts?"

You did it again, johnny. You posted something but didn't offer any thoughts or opinion about it. Nothing. Not even any crucial context, which doesn't interest Trump supporters.

So what's your point? Do you think the quotation is true? or false? absurd? or brilliant?

Do you EVER have any thoughts on the things you post?

[sillydaddy]

Well the media reports that Russian Maria Butina has been arrested for 'spying'...
and her indictment show she was quite active during 2016 and possibly earlier...

now either she was doing this with Obama's blessing or, as the first post indicates....
he had his head up his ass during his administration... :o :lol:

[Clownkicker]

If you would read her indictment instead of simply swallowing what "the media reports" (the propaganda your FOXnews handlers are feeding you) you would know that she has not been charged with spying.

She has been charged with being an unregistered foreign agent and conspiracy to defraud the United States.

https://www.lawfareblog.com/document-in ... iia-butina


Now go back to your handlers, sillydummy, and ask what your opinion is on all this, now that you know she isn't charged with spying.

[johnforbes]

I posted what Saint Barry, patron saint of the Left Wing, said.

Far be it from me to comment upon the sacred words of Barry.

[sillydaddy]

Clown, what are you..a commie lover?

I put the word spying in quotations...because the indictments says conspiracy and really that can involve anything...
I think she may have done a little of that..."in advancing the interests of the Russian Federation ". :o :lol:

[Clownkicker]

See, johnny, it's as I keep sayin'.....ya got nothin'. And plenty of it.

[johnforbes]

Here is what Obama said in Oct 2016:

"There is no serious person out there who would suggest somehow that you could even rig America's elections. There's no evidence that that has happened in the past or that there are instances in which that will happen this time."

[Clownkicker]

Yes, he did. And in the context it was said, it is true.
Obama said Russia couldn't "rig" the voting machines, or the vote counts, or the vote reporting.

But that has nothing to do with whether or not Russia meddled in our election with fake news, computer hacking, illegal campaign contributions, and illegal release of stolen data, does it, johnny.

[johnforbes]

It has everything to do with it.

Obama was aware of problems, and both he and Rice did less than nothing.

Here is what Obama said in Oct 2016:

"There is no serious person out there who would suggest somehow that you could even rig America's elections. There's no evidence that that has happened in the past or that there are instances in which that will happen this time."

[Clownkicker]

Yes, he did. And in the context it was said, it is true.
Obama said Russia couldn't "rig" the voting machines, or the vote counts, or the vote reporting.

But that has nothing to do with whether or not Russia meddled in our election with fake news, computer hacking, illegal campaign contributions, and illegal release of stolen data, does it, johnny.

Why did you fail to mention the context, johnny, and simply repeat your ignorant unsupported assertion about what Obama actually meant?

[namngulfvet]

Yes, he did. And in the context it was said, it is true.
Obama said Russia couldn't "rig" the voting machines, or the vote counts, or the vote reporting.

But that has nothing to do with whether or not Russia meddled in our election with fake news, computer hacking, illegal campaign contributions, and illegal release of stolen data, does it, johnny.

Why did you fail to mention the context, johnny, and simply repeat your ignorant unsupported assertion about what Obama actually meant?

Im surprised you could hear Ojackass with your head so far up his ass.

[Clownkicker]

I'm surprised you're even capable of reading my post.



Did you actually read it? Or did you just see my name and felt compelled to shit yourself again?

[johnforbes]

Here is what Obama said in Oct 2016:

"There is no serious person out there who would suggest somehow that you could even rig America's elections. There's no evidence that that has happened in the past or that there are instances in which that will happen this time."

[Clownkicker]

Yes, he did, and you are intentionally and dishonestly misunderstanding the context.

That's because you are a dishonest partisan scumbag to your core.

[johnforbes]

My core?

No, I do 400 situps per day, and also use my ab roller.

Here is what Obama said in Oct 2016:

"There is no serious person out there who would suggest somehow that you could even rig America's elections. There's no evidence that that has happened in the past or that there are instances in which that will happen this time."

[Clownkicker]

johnny, don't you think it's time you started a new thread explaining how you are sorry for perpetrating the lie about the Steele dossier being the reason for the FISA warrant?

Now that the FISA warrant has been released, it is obvious that the investigation was going on before the Steele dossier came to anyone's attention, and the FISA warrant was renewed by four judges, all appointed by Republicans.

Are you clowns now going to attack all the Republican judges too, as well as all the Republican Senators and Representatives you have already thrown under the bus?

How do you explain such great corruption inherent fundamentally in the Republican Party? How is it that you think Trump, a documented liar and adulterer, is somehow the only honest man in the Republican Party?

And what about Nunez being exposed as a liar about the FISA warrant? Do you think such a liar should be expelled from the House? These are tough questions for conservatives to have to face.

[johnforbes]

The top officials colluding to help Hillary and frame Trump, that clearly began earlier than previously known.

Probably began with orchestration by Jarrett, and likely dated to Lois Lerner's effort to target conservatives for harsher tax treatment in order to suppress Repub voters.

Massive corruption from Saint Barry and his ilk.

[Clownkicker]

^^^^^^ Look at 'im squirm.

That's johnny's way of admitting the investigation did not start with the Steele dossier as he has been saying for over a year.

But for some reason he lacks the balls to just come out and say he was wrong. Big surprise.
Instead of reading what the FISA application actually says, he now pretends that the four Republican judges who renewed the warrant multiple times are somehow magically just the result of a valid tax investigation which is not even mentioned in the FISA application.

But next week he will again start parroting the idiotic claim that the collusion investigation was the result of dishonest use of the Steele dossier. He can't help himself. He's a Trump supporter. Lies are their standing modus operandi.

And notice there's not a peep about the fact that we now know Nunez was lying all this time about it to the American people.

johnforbes fully supports Nunez' lies because they fit what he wants to believe. Reality is of little concern to conservatives.

[johnforbes]

Me?

I have never stated that I thought this fake investigation began with Steele.

It probably began as a discussion with Ben Rhodes, Jarrett, and Barry as to how they could use the tools of govt to protect crooked Hillary and wiretap Trump.

[Clownkicker]

You have repeatedly claimed the FISA warrant for the Mueller investigation was the result of a "phony Steele dossier".

Now you're going to pretend you didn't say that 10 or 15 times?

What a pussy.


And believe me, johnny, this investigation isn't "fake" in any sense of the word. It's quite real.

Just ask Manafort ans Cohen.

[johnforbes]

Comey et al. lied in claiming the fake Steele dossier was not the first, main, and central part of the FISA application corruption.

It was.

Why was anything redacted?

If Trump declassifies the entire mess, it will surely turn out to involve nothing classified but a whole lot of bureaucrat CYAing.

As to when the attempt to protect Hillary and frame Trump began, the Obama Administration had long ago politicized arms of the govt such as the IRS (Lois Lerner).

Probably the effort to nail Trump began as soon as he became one of the final candidates for the nomination.

[Clownkicker]

"Comey et al. lied in claiming the fake Steele dossier was not the first, main, and central part of the FISA application corruption.
It was."-johnfibs

No, it wasn't. You're making it up.
The Steele dossier was almost incidental to the application. Even without the dossier information the warrant would have been RENEWED. Yes, johnny, RENEWED. This was not a new warrant. The investigation was not started based on the dossier, no matter what your handlers say.

Four Republican-appointed judges approved it. What more can you anyone ask for, johnny? If that's not good enough for you, then the entire justice system is not good enough for you.

Why do you hate America so much that you'll lie about this?