[RealJustme]

“I am even more convinced that the FBI did exactly what my fellow citizens would want them to do when they got the information they got and that it has nothing to do with Donald Trump,” Gowdy, a South Carolina Republican, told Fox News on Tuesday.

WOW, libtards are going to melt down. The investigation has noting to do with Trump, watch the media call Gowdy a liar because they want it to do with Trump SOOOOO BAD. :lol: :lol: :lol:

[Clownkicker]

WOW, conservatards are going to melt down. The investigation had nothing to do with spies on Trump, exactly as liberals have been saying. Watch the media praise Gowdy for being honest despite Trump vehemently insisting just the opposite.

Once RealTool finally understands what Gowdy actually said, he's going to be melting down because he wanted it to be about Obama spying on Trump SOOOOO bad. :lol: :lol: :lol:

[RealJustme]

If the FBI didn't lie to Gowdy, Trump isn't under investigation which will cause the media and libtards to melt down.

[Clownkicker]

That's not what he said, dimwit. He said the CI placed in the campaign to investigate Papadopoulos wasn't spying on Trump but was carrying out legitimate law enforcement work.

Criminy, Tool, I keep telling you--you need ESL classes....today.

[RealJustme]

That's not what he said, dimwit. He said the CI placed in the campaign to investigate Papadopoulos wasn't spying on Trump but was carrying out legitimate law enforcement work.

When did he say that?

[Clownkicker]

Tool, until you take the ESL classes there is nothing anyone can say to enlighten you.

If you don't speak the language, you can't understand what the people speaking are saying.

[johnforbes]

No matter who says it, it is absurd not to recognize that what happened here was a conspiracy of top officials (Strzok, Page, Yates, McCabe, Comey, et al.) to protect Hillary (who clearly broke the law) and frame Trump with a fake dossier used to wire tap him.

It is also beyond dispute that Trump was spied upon.

Why didn't they spy on Hillary?

Because this had NOTHING TO DO WITH RUSSIA.

It was a political plot to frame Trump.

[sillydaddy]

"..carrying out legitimate law enforcement work.
.

Sure....
Except that once they didn't tell Trump what they were doing in his campaign...it became Spying..! :lol: :lol: :lol:

[RealJustme]

If what Gowdy says is true, then Trump was never under investigation. Unless the FBI lied to him???

[elklindo69]

This is the awkward moment when Trump can’t get Captain Trey "Benghazi" Goudy to buy into his latest conspiracy theory.

:lol:

[johnforbes]

Gowdy saw NOT ONE PHYSICAL DOCUMENT.

They were merely giving him spin.

Cite anybody you want, but there was no spy in Hillary's campaign.

There was in Trump's, and that's because they were protecting Hillary and framing Trump.

[Clownkicker]

Now johnforbes want "PHYSICAL DOCUMENTS" Never mind that Trump has never produced a single physical document to support his claims. :lol:

This shows you how ossified johnforbes gets in his thinking when he hasn't got a shred of evidence to support his assertions but has been shown plenty of evidence that he's wrong.

johnforbes never lets facts get in the way of a good conspiracy theory.
He is proud of the fact that no one can convince him of anything to the contrary once his simple partisan mind is made up.



The amazing thing is, johnforbes actually believes there is one, and only one, man telling the truth in Washington D.C., and that man is Donald Trump.

To johnforbes, everything Donald Trump says is the truth (even when he blatantly contradicts himself) and EVERYONE ELSE is lying.
It's truly incredible anyone can be that stupid.

[johnforbes]

Gowdy was making a lot of statements, so naturally anybody would want to know his source for that.

Turns out he was allowed to see NOT EVEN ONE PHYSICAL DOCUMENT.

He was just briefed, which these days unfortunately means "fed baloney."

[sillydaddy]

For over a year Mueller has been investigating the Trump campaign looking for Russian collusion...
and speculation that Mueller will request the President be interviewed.....

Now suddenly Gowdy is told the President is not under investigation????? :lol: :lol: :lol:


Yeah right..
that's just as ridiculous as the FBI informant planted in the Trump campaign was there to protect him.. :lol: :lol: :lol:

[Clownkicker]

How is it conservatives understand their mother tongue so poorly that they can't comprehend what was said clear as a bell?

Gowdy didn't say Mueller wasn't investigating Trump. You're making that up.
Gowdy said the confidential informant looking into Papadopoulos had nothing to do with Trump. In other words, he didn't use his CI position to 'spy' on Trump. He only investigated alleged illegal activities by a campaign member, as he should.

Gowdy explained all this to johnforbes, but johnny will continue to regurgitate his partisan propaganda about Obama "spying" on Trump, even though he hasn't got a shred of evidence, NOT EVEN ONE PHYSICAL DOCUMENT, to support his debunked claim.

johnforbes actually thinks he knows more about what's going on in D.C. than a member of the Congressional Oversight Committee. johnny thinks Gowdy was duped and used.

Can you say "hubris"?

I knew you could.

[johnforbes]

Isn't it hubristic to assume any person could know the truth without reading even one document?

Gowdy was making a lot of statements, so naturally anybody would want to know his source for that.

Turns out he was allowed to see NOT EVEN ONE PHYSICAL DOCUMENT.

He was just briefed, which these days unfortunately means "fed baloney."

[Clownkicker]

"Isn't it hubristic to assume any person could know the truth without reading even one document?"-johnflubs

And yet you adamantly assume you know the truth without reading even one document. :lol:
You've been repeating the same nonsense ad nauseum regardless of all facts to the contrary.
Gowdy at least has all the available information.

"Gowdy was making a lot of statements, so naturally anybody would want to know his source for that."-johnflubs

YOU are making a lot of statements, so naturally anybody would want to know your source for that.


As always, you're a hypocritical hoot, johnny.

[sillydaddy]

Gowdy said the confidential informant looking into Papadopoulos had nothing to do with Trump. In other words, he didn't use his CI position to 'spy' on Trump. He only investigated alleged illegal activities by a campaign member, as he should.

Clown, do you actually believe this BULLSHIT you post??


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

[johnforbes]

Here is how it works.

Gowdy said the FBI was okay, and having confidential informants was typical.

So I asked, quite reasonably, what physical documents led him to that conclusion.

The answer: NONE.

[RealJustme]

The vast majority of Americans are done with the Mueller witch hunt. The D.C. swamp has to know that if they try and remove the President through deceit and lies there will be an uprising that will drain the swamp so fast it will make their heads swim.

[Clownkicker]

Here is how it works.

johnforbes said the FBI wasn't okay, and having confidential informants was atypical and tantamount to spying on Trump.

So I asked, quite reasonably, what physical documents led him to that conclusion.

The answer: NONE.

But he'll keep regurgitating his partisan party line in total ignorance of the truth.

[Clownkicker]

"The vast majority of Americans are done with the Mueller witch hunt. "-RealTool

The vast majority of Americans have no idea what Mueller is actually doing. This includes you and every other conservatard troll here. But this is really a joke because you clowns were all for the Ken Starr Special Counsel thing in the 90s and that went on for over four years. Amazingly, not one of you clowns were "done" with it after even two or three years. Forget about the one year looking into Russian interference with our elections that even Trump admits happened.

But how you can be "done" with something you know nothing about is mystifying. There have been no l e a k s and only a few guilty pleas and indictments, all of which point to much more serious violations of the law that should have every patriotic American calling for more answers, not screaming that you don't want any more answers.

"The D.C. swamp has to know that if they try and remove the President through deceit and lies there will be an uprising that will drain the swamp so fast it will make their heads swim."-RealTool

Why would they need deceit and lies, Tool, when the truth shall set us free.
And the truth about Trump isn't pretty, which even you know to be a fact.

[RealJustme]

The vast majority of Americans have no idea what Mueller is actually doing.

Agree clown, over year and 17 million tax dollars later Americans are told it's none of our business what Mueller is doing or investigating.

[sillydaddy]

Yep...Then what about all this bullshit the media has being selling us ..
that Mueller is working for the American people...and that Americans have the right to know. :o :o .

[Clownkicker]

Nobody, not even the President, (or ESPECIALLY the President in this case) has a right to know what is going on in an investigation until it is completed.

Then it will be everybody's business to know and the American people will all find out exactly what Mueller did with his time.

Unfortunately for you Trump supporters, it will then be too late to obstruct justice any further.

That sucks, doesn't it? :o :lol: :lol: :lol:

[RealJustme]

Nobody, not even the President, (or ESPECIALLY the President in this case) has a right to know what is going on in an investigation until it is completed.

We do have a right to know WHAT they are investigating. Mueller isn't saying because he's not investigative a crime, he's trying to find or create one.

[Clownkicker]

"We do have a right to know WHAT they are investigating. Mueller isn't saying because he's not investigative a crime, he's trying to find or create one."-RealTool

You just got done telling us you don't know what Mueller is investigating, and then in your next sentence you say he's not investigating a crime.

How the fuck can you pretend to know that when you just got done telling us we don't know what he's investigating, you moron? :lol: :lol: :lol:

[johnforbes]

There are gems on the Interwebs.

One such pearl of wisdom I located above:

Here is how it works.

Gowdy said the FBI was okay, and having confidential informants was typical.

So I asked, quite reasonably, what physical documents led him to that conclusion.

The answer: NONE.

[Clownkicker]

There are gems on the interwebs.

One such thought-provoking pearl of wisdom I located above:

Here is how it works.

johnforbes said the FBI wasn't okay, and having confidential informants was atypical and tantamount to spying on Trump.

So I asked, quite reasonably, what physical documents led him to that conclusion.

The answer: NONE.

And exactly as I predicted, johnforbes kept regurgitating his partisan party line in total ignorance of the truth.

[johnforbes]

As the first day of this weekend draws to a close, and the sun dips down a bit on the lake, and the breeze is perfumed by the heather, I must note:

Here is how it works.

Gowdy said the FBI was okay, and having confidential informants was typical.

So I asked, quite reasonably, what physical documents led him to that conclusion.

The answer: NONE.

[Clownkicker]

Here is how it works.

If johnforbes were honest, he would have to admit that he has seen no more physical documents to support his partisan views than Gowdy has. Yet johnforbes is adamant that he is right and Gowdy is wrong.

So I ask, quite reasonably, who would you believe in this case? Someone like Gowdy who actually knows something about it, or someone like johnforbes who actually knows nothing about it beyond his partisan propaganda?

The answer: GOWDY.

[namngulfvet]

Here is how it works.

If johnforbes were honest, he would have to admit that he has seen no more physical documents to support his partisan views than Gowdy has. Yet johnforbes is adamant that he is right and Gowdy is wrong.

So I ask, quite reasonably, who would you believe in this case? Someone like Gowdy who actually knows something about it, or someone like johnforbes who actually knows nothing about it beyond his partisan propaganda?

The answer: GOWDY.

And then there the Clown drunk on his ass with Snakcrap and Elkshit passed out on his basement floor next to him. copy and pasting because thats all he has :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Bet Clown had fun making their butts water as they played "Sniff the Ass Hole' and guess what I had for breakfast and luch.

[Clownkicker]

^^^^ What is this little turd-breath's obsession with assholes and sniffing assholes and licking assholes?

Undoubtedly namandgulf must love to eat "hot lunches".

[johnforbes]

Gowdy said the FBI was okay, and having confidential informants was typical.

So I asked, quite reasonably, what physical documents led him to that conclusion.

The answer: NONE.

[Clownkicker]

johnforbes said the FBI wasn't okay, and having confidential informants was atypical and tantamount to spying on Trump.

So I asked, quite reasonably, what physical documents led him to that conclusion.

The answer: NONE.

[johnforbes]

Here is how it works.

Gowdy said the FBI was okay, and having confidential informants was typical.

So I asked, quite reasonably, what physical documents led him to that conclusion.

The answer: NONE.

[elklindo69]

Ghouliani claims that “Our recollection keeps changing”

No, Rudy your client's lies keep changing.

:lol:

[johnforbes]

Elkin, you are certainly entitled to your opinion.

As is Gowdy.

But what I was saying above is that, given what Gowdy and Rubio have said, what documents support them?

What happened was they were briefed, and that's fine, but let's see ALL THE RELEVANT DOCUMENTS.

If they are correct, they would want all documents released.

Instead, what is happening is slow walking in the hope that Dems will retake the House and end any investigation of the enormous corruption surrounding the Obama Administration's use of important federal agencies to prevent Trump from winning and -- failing that -- from governing.

[RealJustme]

Instead, what is happening is slow walking in the hope that Dems will retake the House and end any investigation of the enormous corruption surrounding the Obama Administration's use of important federal agencies to prevent Trump from winning and -- failing that -- from governing.

That is exactly what is happening. It's all about creating as much harm as the swamp can in hopes it'll give Democrats enough votes to take back the House. If that does take place you can watch for them to take over the witch hunt and Mueller to close his down.

The fact that Gowdy claims he has seen everything and that Trump isn't under investigation means Trump is in the clear unless they can create a crime like they did with Flynn. I assure you Mueller and his team wouldn't accept a failure to remember, or misspeaking as a defense, they would charge him in a heartbeat for lying to a federal agent if he got "one thing" wrong during a 4 hour interview. That's their only chance of charging the President.

[elklindo69]

I think it's safe to say that both sides, even his lawyers, agree that Trump is guilty...so now we are haggling over the sentencing.

:lol:

[namngulfvet]

I think it's safe to say that both sides, even his lawyers, agree that Trump is guilty...so now we are haggling over the sentencing.

:lol:

Whine for us Elkydoofus

[RealJustme]

Within two weeks information will be released that will result in mass suicides in the progressive crowds. The noose they created is being removed from Trump's neck and placed on one of their hero's. :lol: :lol: :lol:

[elklindo69]

Obama spent 8 years as President and he never ever publicly discussed pardoning himself.

But think if Obama ever said that he could pardon himself...conservatards would have bought up every sheet at Macys...

:lol:

[johnforbes]

He did a vest pocket pardon on the enormous corruption at the very apex of his Administration.

Top officials protected Hillary, who very clearly broke 18 USC 793, and then abused the FISA process to wiretap Trump.

[RealJustme]

Obama spent 8 years as President and he never ever publicly discussed pardoning himself.

Neither has Trump!

[elklindo69]

Obama spent 8 years as President and he never ever publicly discussed pardoning himself.

Neither has Trump!

@realDonaldTrump

As has been stated by numerous legal scholars, I have the absolute right to PARDON myself, but why would I do that when I have done nothing wrong? In the meantime, the never ending Witch Hunt, led by 13 very Angry and Conflicted Democrats (& others) continues into the mid-terms!

[RealJustme]

Is that what you're going off of? Trump was stating a fact, so where did he said he was going to pardon himself as you allege?

[elklindo69]

Is that what you're going off of? Trump was stating a fact, so where did he said he was going to pardon himself as you allege?

Justme...let me explain to you in crayola. Why does Trump talk about pardoning himself if he claims to be innocent?

Probably because Trump is guilty and plans to pardon himself, his family, and his Russian buddies.

Got it!

:lol:

[johnforbes]

Elkin, come on.

Now you are pretending to be the teacher explaining something to a child with "Crayola"?

Come on, you are young and lightly educated and deeply leftist.

You don't have the intellect or experience to pull off any attempt to be condescending.

[RealJustme]

Justme...let me explain to you in crayola. Why does Trump talk about pardoning himself if he claims to be innocent?

Where did Trump say that? Why do make this stuff up?