Page 1 of 1

Why isn't thing nut case taken out?

Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 11:02 am
by RealJustme
SEOUL — North Korea claimed Sunday that it could wipe out Manhattan by sending a hydrogen bomb on a ballistic missile to the heart of New York, the latest in a string of brazen threats. Kim Jong warned that the United States will soon experience North Korea's full might.
Obama and Hillary sent our military into Libya to kill Muammar Gaddafi because they claimed he was a cruel man and that America could not just stand by while he threatened America and brutalized his own citizens.

Well, Gaddafi was an angle compared to Kim Jong concerning how he treats his own people and Kim Jong's threats are more real than Gaddafi who's missile range wouldn't even reach the next city in his own country.

Libya under Gaddafi became the most literate, longest living, most educated, highest median income country in Africa with social welfare benefits that would make the most liberal of Europeans green with envy. Under Kim Jong people are executed for making eye contact with Kim Jong and the vast majority of the population live on a starvation diet. Both were intolerant bad men but to take out Gaddafi while pampering Kim Jong is a mystery.

Soooo, why take out Gaddafi but not Kim Jong. Gaddafi was a moderate Muslim who rejected many provisions of Islamic Law including requiring women to wear burqas. He allowed them to hold offices and drive. Under Gaddafi requiring a woman to wear a Burka was a crime. Traditional Muslims called for his removal for refusing to follow Sharia Law...is this why Obama took him out?

Re: Why isn't thing nut case taken out?

Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 11:24 am
by Clownkicker
And RealTool demonstrates that he still hasn't learned a thing from Libya and Iraq. :(

What is it about reactionaries that love to go to unwinnable war?
They never go themselves, of course, but hey, it's the principle...

Re: Why isn't thing nut case taken out?

Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 12:13 pm
by RealJustme
And RealTool demonstrates that he still hasn't learned a thing from Libya...
Hillary and Obama own Libya and in fact just yesterday Hillary was bragging about her being the architect in removing Minyar al-Gaddafi and in on the plans that took out Bin Laden. And this wacky cow is running for President.

Re: Why isn't thing nut case taken out?

Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 12:18 pm
by sillydaddy
America hasn't won a war since WWII.....Sad but true.

Safe to say there are two generations that don't know what a complete military victory tastes like.

It's almost as if we are afraid to win.

Re: Why isn't thing nut case taken out?

Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 1:53 pm
by Clownkicker
"Hillary and Obama own Libya and in fact just yesterday Hillary was bragging about her being the architect in removing Minyar al-Gaddafi and in on the plans that took out Bin Laden. And this wacky cow is running for President."-RealTool

Hey, I thought this thread was about why you think we should go into North Korea even after Libya and Iraq were such disasters.

To say that Libya is a disaster for Hillary only weakens your mindless case for taking out Kim. It doesn't strengthen your case like you seem to think.
But what else does a partisan hack do?

"Hillary is incompetent. Now let's go do the same thing somewhere else, and if a Republican does it, it will be sheer genius this time."-RealTool :roll:

Re: Why isn't thing nut case taken out?

Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 2:13 pm
by johnforbes
Not since 1945 has the U.S. even tried to win a war.

After that, there were limited wars which only limit the chance to win.

Re: Why isn't thing nut case taken out?

Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 4:15 pm
by sillydaddy
If Truman had allowed MacArthur to run the war like he wanted ..instead ordering him to stop at the 38th parallel...

We wouldn't have Jong shooting off mouth today.

But Truman was afraid....scare shitless of Russia and China...

Well...you all know the rest!

Re: Why isn't thing nut case taken out?

Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 4:32 pm
by RealJustme
Hey, I thought this thread was about why you think we should go into North Korea even after Libya and Iraq were such disasters.
Once again I went over your head clown. Read my original post over real slow. I'm not saying we should go into North Korea, I'm pointing out Obama and Hillary's hypocrisy in going after one wacko and then bragging about it but explainingg they had no choice but to do it, then not going in after an even worse wacko. They lied to the American people as to why we "had" to take the Libyan leader out. Get it now.

Re: Why isn't thing nut case taken out?

Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 5:58 pm
by johnforbes
Danny DeVito is over Clowntoker's head.

We all recall that game where DeVito took Clown to the paint and slammed over him.

Re: Why isn't thing nut case taken out?

Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2016 8:56 am
by Clownkicker
"They lied to the American people as to why we "had" to take the [Iraqi] leader out. Get it now."_-RealTool

Yeah, do you get it now, RealTool?

C'mon, you're almost there to realizing what really went on. Now make that last small step and stop being just a partisan hack.

Re: Why isn't thing nut case taken out?

Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2016 9:18 am
by RealJustme
Yeah, do you get it now, RealTool?
Yep once again you run to Hillary's aid trying to justify her lies based upon someone else lying in the past. Weak dude very weak.

Re: Why isn't thing nut case taken out?

Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2016 9:50 am
by Clownkicker
Tool, nothing I said does anything to "aid" Hillary.

Stop distracting and admit you made the case against yourself. :lol:

Re: Why isn't thing nut case taken out?

Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2016 10:18 am
by johnforbes
Danny DeVito is over Clowntoker's head.

We all recall that game where DeVito took Clown to the paint and slammed over him.