Political discussions about everything
By johnforbes
#59911
Given equal protection, can a man marry a turtle?

If not, why not?

Do you hate turtles?

Don't we all deplore this racism against turtles?
By Clownkicker
#59914
What a stupid question.

YOUR wife married a weasel and nobody stopped HER.


johnny, marriage laws only apply to humans.
If you don't understand that, then it's further proof you aren't a lawyer.
By Clownkicker
#59918
But I did answer your question, johnny.
You asked why we shouldn't allow marriage between species and I told you why.
You were just too stupid to ask the question you actually wanted answered.

Why do we have laws against polygamy, johnny?
It is not only "traditional", it is still common in many places in the world.
But you aren't advocating for "traditional" polygamy in the same breath you are advocating against same-sex marriage as you pretend marriage "tradition" is the yardstick by which we should measure our society.

Slavery is also quite common around the world. It has been going on for tens of thousands of years.
Why do we pass laws against this beloved tradition and you aren't here screaming that it should be allowed because it's "traditional"?
Oh, wait, your ARE still upset about the slavery flag thing. So bad example.

Women "traditionally" weren't allowed to vote for thousands of years, yet we changed that tradition. Why?

Why did we pass laws to prevent laws that discriminate against interracial marriages? They weren't "traditional" in America either. I suppose you have a problem with them but are too chicken shit to say so.
Equal protection, johnny. Your disingenuous whining about "traditional" marriage is not an argument for enshrining injustice in the law.
But even if we accepted your dishonest argument for your imaginary "tradition", some unjust traditions need to end when their time has run its course. And this is one of those times.
User avatar
By RealJustme
#59919
There's a man in California that's filed paper work to marry his dog who he's fallen deeply in love with, the spiral has began. Oh I forgot to mention the dog is a male, soooo maybe that'll make it OK?
By johnforbes
#59921
This is the slippery slope.

If traditional marriage means nothing, it would be very easy to extend equal protection to marriage of 3 people or more.

And why hate turtles?

Where does it say marriage is delimited to humans?

And now the Supreme Court says states cannot require voters to be citizens, so why not let all of El Salvador vote in U.S. elections?
By Clownkicker
#59949
"Where does it say marriage is delimited to humans?"-johnforbes

This again is proof johnforbes never went to Yale Law.
You can't get out of there without knowing at least the basics of contract law.

Tell us, counselor, what is required to enter a legally binding contract such as civil marriage?
Then tell us why a dog or a turtle can't be a party to a legal contract.
And that's just ONE of the reasons animals can't be married.
Can you give me another, oh Grand Poo-baah of Law?

There is no silly "slippery slope" about this, johnny.
Only a legal ignoramus could think there is.
Nothing about marriage changes in the slightest.
The only change in the status quo is that more people may now participate in the last 15 hold-out states.
By Clownkicker
#59951
By the way, johnny, my condolences on the failure of your marriage.

But it was bound to happen, what with all the damage done to the institution of marriage by gays.
That terrible damage, combined with your obvious sexual ambiguity and ambivalence, meant your marriage didn't stand a chance when facing these "limp" times.
By Clownkicker
#59965
^^^^^That's johnny's way of saying "I can't refute a thing you said, so I'm going to act like a moron to distract everyone from my mental impotence."
By johnforbes
#59984
This is the slippery slope.

If traditional marriage means nothing, it would be very easy to extend equal protection to marriage of 3 people or more.

And why hate turtles?

Where does it say marriage is delimited to humans?

And now the Supreme Court says states cannot require voters to be citizens, so why not let all of El Salvador vote in U.S. elections?
By Clownkicker
#59989
^^^^^^That's johnny's way of saying he's mentally handicapped and is only able to drool and repeat himself ad nauseum when someone shows him to be a fool.
By elklindo69
#60012
johnforbes wrote:Given equal protection, can a man marry a turtle?

If not, why not?

Do you hate turtles?

Don't we all deplore this racism against turtles?
Complete asininity...

Step away from the bottle of grain alcohol Johnnie Boy!!!

:lol:
User avatar
By RealJustme
#60014
Complete asininity...

Step away from the bottle of grain alcohol Johnnie Boy!!!
Oddly a turtle would be more attractive to me than a man's anus, but yet Clown you feel going after the dude's anus is logical but the turtle is asininity. What a wacky world we live in.
By johnforbes
#60049
This is the slippery slope.

If traditional marriage means nothing, it would be very easy to extend equal protection to marriage of 3 people or more.

And why hate turtles?

Where does it say marriage is delimited to humans?

And now the Supreme Court says states cannot require voters to be citizens, so why not let all of El Salvador vote in U.S. elections?
By Clownkicker
#60051
Will someone notify the nurses' station that johnforbes is wandering the halls again in his bathrobe and slippers, babbling to himself nonsensically?

He thinks he's "leaving" and might get out the front door somehow.
By johnforbes
#60068
If, in any way, I have failed to please Clownslacker, it means my whole life is a failure.

I'm heartbroken.

In fact, I plan on singing each and every one of the songs of Hank Williams, Sr.
By Clownkicker
#60074
johnny, there's tapioca pudding in the lunchroom.

Your favorite, remember?

It reminds you of your college days blowing the rowing team behind the shell house.
By johnforbes
#60083
In anger unkind words were said, that made the teardrops start.

Why we all ease Clowntoker's diseased, leftist mind?

And melt his dumb, dumb heart.
User avatar
By RealJustme
#60091
Mayor Of Mexican Village Marries Crocodile, Residents Rejoice.Joel Vasquez Rojas, the mayor of southern Mexican fishing town San Pedro Huamelula, 'married' a crocodile.
I'm betting the couple with settle in Southern California where they'll vote Democrat and complain the public school system is under funded and man made global warming is causing weird things to happen.
By Clownkicker
#60092
^^^^And that's just how easy it is for a Mexican to dupe RealTool.


He'll take absolutely anything at face value. Not the slightest sense of satire or the absurd.:lol:
By johnforbes
#60100
I'm still depressed at my apparent failure to please Clownslobber.

Luckily, I did my usual 400 situps and lifted weights, so now I'm sipping coffee and thinking about running this afternoon versus hiking.
User avatar
By RealJustme
#60103
He'll take absolutely anything at face value. Not the slightest sense of satire or the absurd.
:roll: You stepped into that one, you're really slipping clown. :D
By Clownkicker
#60107
That's what you say when you finally look into something, find out you were had, and then pretend you weren't taken in the first time, Tool. :lol:
By johnforbes
#60157
My spirit is fresh and new, much like the morning dew.

However, I've been depressed lately by these negative comments, so I'm leaving the Internet forever.

Actually, forever and a day.
By johnforbes
#60161
It's true.

My sensitive spirit, honed by reading Keats, has been wounded by the slightly negative tone of Clowndumber's postings.

So it is over for me on the Internet.

As soon as I figure out where the Internet is, I'm leaving it forever.
By Clownkicker
#60164
As we've all known for some time now, johnforbes is lost in the c l o u d.

It explains his fuzzy, hazy "Weltbild" and the drippy nature of his con"dense"d thought processes.

Even in the midst of the combined resources of the internet, johnforbes still lacks the mental capacity to discuss or argue any topic whatsoever, leaving him nothing but this pitiable, painful trolling for me, almost like he feels "socked in" the nuts by my irrefutable comments.



johnforbes is a mere dribble of an intellect.
By Clownkicker
#60170
johnny, if they didn't hit you square in the nads because you know they are true, you wouldn't always be starting these impotent personal attack threads and come trolling for me for days on end.

YOU'RE the one doing all the trolling, johnny. What does that tell you about yourself?
What do you hope to accomplish by it?
Do you honestly think your idiotic trolling will get ME to "leave the internet forever"? :lol:
User avatar
By RealJustme
#60176
Clown- YOU'RE the one doing all the trolling, johnny. What does that tell you about yourself?
Clown you have 12 posts on this thread, 10 of them are trolling John the other two post are trolling me, all 12 of your posts are trolling, not one of your posts were on the subject of this thread...so what does tell you about yourself? ;)
By johnforbes
#60181
I would post more in reply to Clowndoper, but his comments have made me weep.

I can now confirm I am leaving the Internet forever.

One day, 5 or 10 years hence, Clownleftist will miss me and regret his hurtful remarks.

For now, we can all just sing of memories -- misty watercolor memories, of the way we were.
By Clownkicker
#60196
Tool, I'm the ONLY person here who actually discussed the topic, which is a stupid bit of trolling from johnforbes in the first place.
He never wanted to know whether you can marry a turtle. He already knows you can't, and he already knows why.

Except for the posts specifically responding to johnny's direct trolling for me personally, every post I made is on topic, including the ones where I interpreted johnforbes' impotence for the rest of you because it shows he has no interest in actually discussing the topic.
johnforbes has 14 comments on this thread, every last one of them trolling. But you don't point that out as you pretend I am the one at fault.

You really need to look up the term "trolling". You don't even know what it means.
I don't want to upset johnny and I don't want to elicit an angry response from him.
I want him to defend his stupidity rationally or shut up about it.
But he can't. He honestly doesn't recognize the depth of his own ignorance.
By Clownkicker
#60201
Yeah, Dog, snakeoil posts legitimate topics and sometimes manages to lead a semblance of a discussion.

I try three or four times a year, but to no avail. Anytime I do, all I get in response is crickets.
Other than snakeoil and myself, not a clown here seems to be able to discuss his position rationally.
By Dogzilla
#60206
Yeah.....places like this are more of an amusement for most people, rather than a forum for serious talks.

Speaking of amusement......any interest in an additional forum for fun and games? It's sadly lacking for non-rightwingwhackos, so the pickings are easy.
By Intrepid
#60211
That assertion from Loser Lucky would be hilarious were it not so fantasticly phony.
It probably has a lot to do with his drug induced delusions.

Hey leg humper, have you yet expressed your fondness for young girls or called for the assassination of a sitting president on this site you say you frequent, or did you learn your lesson here?
Maybe it would be best if you took another road trip to S.C. to visit your lot puffing buddy and you could discuss it in person over a few bowls of Loser Lucky's best home grown.

Like, wow man
By Intrepid
#60222
"Gung ho" is Korean for, "Work together." So you are saying you and others on your cut rate landscaping crew all perve on underage girls trying to find a private place to pee?

Or are you working on a conspiracy... The same sort of thing that got you banned before?

Just head on over to S.C. and get stoned with Loser Lucky. Less trouble for you that way.
If that chick's dad ever finds out S.C. and Loser Lucky's single side crash pad won't be far enough away.
By Dogzilla
#60232
All of my help is "underaged" girls. You should be so lucky.

And speaking of conspiracies.......My latest is that all tea party nutjobs are latent homosexuals. So, if you can take the dick out of your mouth for long enough, could you tell us if you prefer spitting or swallowing.
By Intrepid
#60235
Well, where to start?

You would think a public school teacher would know that the word is: "Madam" NOT as you spelled it "Madaam."
Of course you also once talked about someone being in, "The THROWS of a dilemma, when what you meant was "throes."
Then you talk about, "Latent homosexuality." Do you know what "Latent" means? Clearly not. It means Capable of emerging but not not visible. So someone who sucks cock, like you, wouldn't be Latent. I mean, since you had to suck months worth of Igor ass in order to be allowed back, moving around to whistle a tune on the old skin flute like your butt buddy Hussein Obozo did in the bath houses of Chicago wouldn't be a bridge too far at all. Perhaps that would have been a way to get the taste of ass out of your mouth.

What all of this really does is point out how badly people need to get their kids out of public schools so they can actually get an education and not be abused and corrupted by idiots like you.

Evidently you didn't learn from your earlier narrow escape. A whole crew of underage girls? I bet you still haven't bothered to rent a porta-potty for them either, have you? Makes perving options as they look for a private place to take a leak much more numerous I suppose. Hey, once you find something that works, stick with it I always say.
One of those girl's daddy's is going to catch on one of these days. I doubt your fat ass could run very far or fast. I'd buy a ticket to watch that ass whipping.

I'm glad you are back Dogshitzilla. I get tired of body slamming your pot puffing Marxist next state neighbor Loser Lucky all the time. A little variety is nice. Although now at least he has outed himself both as being Loser Lucky and living in South Carolina. I'm working on getting him to admit he's a drug addled junkie now.
After all, the first step to solving a problem is admitting you have one.

PS, Like your asshole buddy Loser Lucky, you got no game either.
By Clownkicker
#60239
Congratualations, Dog, youo got Insipid to piss away 15 minutes of his life on another idiotic igno-rant. :lol: :lol: :lol:

(Three more emoticons for you, PainfulTooth.)


Dog, this dimwit Insipid has been raving about Lucky for three years now when Lucky hasn't even popped his nose in here once in all that time.
Lucky still owns his sorry ass that completely and Insipid still doesn't get it.

Watch this----

Insipid, do your silly "Loser Lucky" raving and spastic dancing for us again. I command it.
By Dogzilla
#60242
Gee, Johnny.....I thought you were going away. Damn.....Ya can't count on anybody keeping their word anymore!

Yeah, Clownkicker.......I can almost see Toothache gettin all lathered up and foam flying out the corners of his mouth as he was typing all that shit. What a pathetic waste of human flesh!
User avatar
By Malcolm
#60257
Why, yes....
Attachments
turtle-togetherness.gif
turtle-togetherness.gif (946.15 KiB) Viewed 9317 times
turtle-eating-mashed-potatoes.jpg
turtle-eating-mashed-potatoes.jpg (57.3 KiB) Viewed 9317 times
long long title how many chars? lets see 123 ok more? yes 60

We have created lots of YouTube videos just so you can achieve [...]

Another post test yes yes yes or no, maybe ni? :-/

The best flat phpBB theme around. Period. Fine craftmanship and [...]

Do you need a super MOD? Well here it is. chew on this

All you need is right here. Content tag, SEO, listing, Pizza and spaghetti [...]

Lasagna on me this time ok? I got plenty of cash

this should be fantastic. but what about links,images, bbcodes etc etc? [...]