Page 1 of 1

Is Unemployment Really Low?

Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2015 3:55 pm
by johnforbes
The headlines are filled with reports of unemployment somewhat over 5 percent.

Why is the U-6 now exactly 11 percent?

Why is the labor force participation rate 62.8 percent?

Sure, it is good that unemployment has been trending down, but when people argue the trend they are usually trying to distract you from where you are now -- i.e., what really matters.

And where we are now is 11 percent real unemployment, with shockingly low participation of 62 percent.

Re: Is Unemployment Really Low?

Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 3:16 pm
by elklindo69
Forbestardo's IQ is really low.

Lower than the unemployment rate.

Only a dummy would cherry pick the numbers to agree with the pet theory.

Murphy's Law in full effect!!!

:lol:

Re: Is Unemployment Really Low?

Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 6:19 pm
by johnforbes
Elkin, a youthful moron, didn't dispute a word of what I wrote.

The headlines are filled with reports of unemployment somewhat over 5 percent.

Why is the U-6 now exactly 11 percent?

Why is the labor force participation rate 62.8 percent?

Sure, it is good that unemployment has been trending down, but when people argue the trend they are usually trying to distract you from where you are now -- i.e., what really matters.

And where we are now is 11 percent real unemployment, with shockingly low participation of 62 percent

Re: Is Unemployment Really Low?

Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 3:45 pm
by elklindo69
johnforbes wrote:Elkin, a youthful moron, didn't dispute a word of what I wrote.

The headlines are filled with reports of unemployment somewhat over 5 percent.

Why is the U-6 now exactly 11 percent?

Why is the labor force participation rate 62.8 percent?

Sure, it is good that unemployment has been trending down, but when people argue the trend they are usually trying to distract you from where you are now -- i.e., what really matters.

And where we are now is 11 percent real unemployment, with shockingly low participation of 62 percent
Why don't you explain the disparity in the data points?

You posted.

Explain...

Re: Is Unemployment Really Low?

Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 4:22 pm
by johnforbes
If the economy is strong, why does the Fed hold rates are essentially zero?

The headlines are filled with reports of unemployment somewhat over 5 percent.

Why is the U-6 now exactly 11 percent?

Why is the labor force participation rate 62.8 percent?

Sure, it is good that unemployment has been trending down, but when people argue the trend they are usually trying to distract you from where you are now -- i.e., what really matters.

And where we are now is 11 percent real unemployment, with shockingly low participation of 62 percent.

Re: Is Unemployment Really Low?

Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2015 10:29 am
by johnforbes
Perhaps the so-called headline unemployment rate gets so much attention because it is pretty much the only positive economic indicator?

And, if you look more deeply at the U-6 and the 62 percent participation rate, that isn't good either.

Re: Is Unemployment Really Low?

Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2015 11:41 pm
by Malcolm

Re: Is Unemployment Really Low?

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2015 12:36 pm
by johnforbes
On a positive note, Mick Jagger looks muscular compared to Elkin's somatic habitus.

Re: Is Unemployment Really Low?

Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2015 2:34 pm
by elklindo69
Forbestardo will be shortly discussing the merits of allowing the investment banks to participate in 'proprietary trading' aka day trading, for all of you homegamers out there...