Political discussions about everything
By johnforbes
#138028
In 2020, Biden got 81 million votes.

Camilla got about 68 million.

Were voter rolls cleaned up that much? Were that many dead people on the rolls?

Every Democrat wants to know: What happened to millions of Democrat votes with most media outlets passionately supporting Democrats?
By Clownkicker
#138037
Perhaps it's time to listen to Trump when he said repeatedly that this would be the crookedest election in history. Maybe he was right, eh?

You're definitely making a stronger case than Republicans did in 2020.
By sillydaddy
#138038
Polls said it was a razor thin margin between the two...neck and neck some said...
Well, The Demos sure folded in a hurry, if that was the case... :O
By Clownkicker
#138039
Wow, even sillydummy is concerned that the race was called so quickly.

Undoubtedly he believes Trump when he repeatedly said this was the crookedest election in our history.

I can understand why he might say that, given that he's the sort that believes everything Trump says.
By sillydaddy
#138041
Some states are still counting ballots...for congress seats..
Are the demos up to their old tricks....again? :O
By johnforbes
#138044
Mr Forbes is simply concerned about election integrity.

Senile Joe got 81 million votes.

Perhaps some of those votes came because of his youthful vigor and Einsteinian intellect, but the question lingers:

How come Camilla Harris only got 68 million?
By Clownkicker
#138053
"How come Camilla Harris only got 68 million?"-johnfoibles

I would guess it's because only 68 million people voted for her. Duhhh...

You seem overly concerned that perhaps Republicans pulled a fast one this time and Trump was right all along; that this was the crookedest election in history.

Like Harris, I accepted the outcome. So why you are still questioning the outcome is baffling. Look into those cheating Republicans, johnny, and get back to us when you uncover the corruption inherent in the lot of them.
By johnforbes
#138058
Mr Forbes cares about election integrity for every valid voter.

But the mainstream media outlets were passionately in favor of Camilla Harris. Or Kamilla, or whatever her name was.

She spent just over ONE BILLION DOLLARS on her campaign, and even ended up in debt.

She paid Oprah $1 million for an interview.

But yet she only got 68 million votes while Joe got 81 million.

Was that due to Joe's youthful vigor and charisma?
By Clownkicker
#138063
"Mr Forbes cares about election integrity for every valid voter."-johnforbes

So what? So do I and you couldn't care less about what I care about.

Now tell us what in the world all that other crap you posted has to do with "election integrity for every valid voter."

Are you trying to say that for Harris to lose after all those things you posted indicate that Republicans have made this the most corrupt election in our history the way Trump warned us all about many times?

If that's the case, I look forward to your multi-state lawsuits against Republicans for election fraud that you seem to be convinced MUST have occurred for Harris to lose.
By johnforbes
#138072
The puzzling thing is that Trump won Wisconsin, Arizona, and Nevada.

Yet those who voted for Trump somehow turned 180 degrees to vote against Hovde and Kari Lake.

Very odd.

In Hovde's case, there was even the 4 am ballot dump which favored Democrats by 90 percent (statistically very, very unlikely)...
By Clownkicker
#138074
johnforbes is making quite a convincing case for Trump fraud in what Trump called this "most corrupt election in history" if he won in areas that otherwise voted for Democrats.

Let me know when your troop of fellow Republicans for Election Integrity start filing their lawsuits against Trump's apparent fraud in those swing states, johnny.
By johnforbes
#138080
In PA, they are admitting to counting improperly.

"Bucks County commissioners voted to count ballots lacking proper signatures, violating a Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling earlier this year.

Diane Marseglia knowingly violated the courts decision and voted to count inelligible ballots..."
By Clownkicker
#138086
I'm surprised that a believer in probable election fraud by Republicans in this election would be here advocating for the disenfranchisement of legal voters who only signed their ballots once instead of the required two signatures. (as is the case with many of the Buck County 'unsigned' ballots)

After all, johnforbes has said repeatedly that he wants the votes of all legal voters to be counted. Now johnny is saying that if a legal voter only signs his ballot once instead of twice, then he is no longer considered an American with the legal right to have his vote counted. And the undated ballots?

"It's a pretty stupid thing not to count someone's vote because they didn't date a ballot when we know when it was printed, when it was received and it's not possible to be a different ballot," [Buck County commissioner] Harvie said. "This is one of those issues where I think it's intentionally disenfranchising people."

Who can figure out the convoluted 'reasoning' of johnforbes? He will absolutely convince himself that he wants all legal voters' votes counted, and then he will turn around and contradict himself by supporting the idea that only those Americans who meet the requirement of hopping on one foot and rubbing their tummies while voting should have their votes counted, despite the fact that johnforbes knows beyond a doubt that the votes were valid. johnforbes also supports the literacy tests that whites imposed on blacks to keep blacks from having their legal votes counted. After all, those were the law at the time and johnny believes no one should question the voting laws at any given time in our history. johnny is adamant about always supporting the law, no matter how disenfranchising a law may be. (As long as it benefits HIS political party of course, and not the other guy's. THEN he is suitably outraged by the injustice.)
By johnforbes
#138090
With regard to Bucks County, the PA Supreme Court had to AGAIN rule and tell them dates matter.

If you pay your electricity bill, it is not enough to sign or e-sign. You must add the date.

It is not enough to pay your electricity bill in April 1927, but it must be done currently.

It is no shock that you must plug into the current year...

Criminy, johnforbes will (as Trump says) "nev[…]

I'd like to thank Mr Forbes for posting that

Clowntoker's bunker had been assaulted many times […]

Obliterated what?

It was lazy of Hillary to use her Blackberry to se[…]

Mr Forbes, as always, awaits the evidence. He has[…]

Hulk Hogan

Years ago, at Dulles Intl Airport, I ran into Hulk[…]

And "deflection" is the only word the L[…]

As if we didn't know already.... Attorney Genera[…]