[johnforbes]

Thoughts?

[RealJustme]

Now Schiff is acting surprised that his daughter's boyfriend is actually the whistleblower, Schiff never stops lying.

[sillydaddy]

Was reading an article about this...
FactCheck immediately clamed it is "False"...
however they base their evidence on Schiff saying , it's not him..!

[Clownkicker]

Don't worry, silly. johnforbes swallows everything from his handlers without question. There's no point in talking facts with him anyway.

[johnforbes]

Clown has blown many "whistles" during his long tenure in Frisco...

[Clownkicker]

See, silly? johnforbes has nothing. He only stopped in with a moronic and boring personal attack because he has no facts to offer in support of his position.

He is the epitome of a Republican; ignorant, mean, and vindictive.

[RealJustme]

Clown- johnforbes has nothing. He only stopped in with a moronic and boring personal attack ... He is the epitome of a Republican; ignorant, mean, and vindictive.

You can't make this shit up, clown really doesn't realize how stupid his posts are.

[Clownkicker]

Tool, my posts are so insightful and intelligent that johnforbes' own staff felt compelled to email me that they found that last one particularly profound and fascinating.

[RealJustme]

Tool, my posts are so insightful and intelligent that johnforbes' own staff felt compelled to email me that they found that last one particularly profound and fascinating.

Clown, a third grade school teacher would call that a fused run-on sentence.

[Clownkicker]

But unlike your travesties of English, it is grammatically correct. And one may always intentionally write a run on sentence as a stylistic choice. And you understood perfectly well what I was saying, so the choice was fine.

You regularly post gibberish because you don't know any better.

See the difference?

[johnforbes]

So Clowntoker's postings are Faulknerian?

[Clownkicker]

At your next truck stop you have my permission to finally Go Down, johnforbes.

[RealJustme]

Clown -"...one may always intentionally write a run on sentence as a stylistic choice..."

I tried telling my grade school teacher my grammar errors were just my stylistic choices, she didn't accept it. You have to move on from your grade school excuses clown. Unless you're plagiarizing from blog sites, your posts are full of errors.

Now you'll spend an hour googling your favorite leftist blog sites, attempting to find a response. Happy hunting

[sillydaddy]

Clown was plagiarizing Willie Shakespeare not long ago...Now he thinks he's James Joyce...

[Clownkicker]

"I tried telling my grade school teacher my grammar errors were just my stylistic choices, she didn't accept it. "-RealStool

I tried telling RealTool that my sentence was grammatically correct, but he's so stupid that right after you tell him something, he can't remember the first half of the sentence he just heard.

[Clownkicker]

"Clown was plagiarizing Willie Shakespeare not long ago.."-sillydumbfuck

No one can "plagiarize" Shakespeare, you moron. Any educated person already knows who wrote it, so the attribution is unnecessary, especially in a satirical comment. THAT was the joke, dimwit. Such a joke only needs to be explained to the grossly ignorant Trump supporter.

[johnforbes]

That leads to the problem modern Democrats have.

They say Bloomberg is trying to buy the nomination, and he is.

But so is Bernie by offering "bribes" in the form of freebies to grossly ignorant Democrats.

Free college, free health care, all free, and Bernie depends on grossly ignorant people to think such things are free.

[Clownkicker]

"They say Bloomberg is trying to buy the nomination, and he is.
But so is Bernie by offering "bribes" in the form of freebies to grossly ignorant Democrats."-johnfibs

Semantics, johnny. Honestly, how do you live with yourself.

You know perfectly well that "buy" means two different things in those two sentences. You don't get to change the meaning of the word in the middle of your argument and pretend you aren't just a dishonest scumbag, which you are.

Your dishonest use of "bribes" --political promises of Trump and every other politician-- are not the same thing as literal personal cash spent purely for publicity and name recognition. Bloomberg is not figuratively trying to 'buy' the nomination. He is literally trying to buy the nomination.

[johnforbes]

How does Bernie, a Harvard grad, live with himself knowing that he is offering "free" stuff to grossly ignorant people, and knowing there's no money to have taxpayers fork that over?

In the clearest possible way, and the Founding Fathers were concerned with this very point long ago, Bernie is trying to buy the election by offering what are essentially promises or bribes for votes.