Page 1 of 1

Mueller's Convenient Omission

Posted: Fri Jul 26, 2019 3:08 pm
by johnforbes
Mueller seemed to think he could investigate Trump Jr's brief meeting with the Russian lawyer, but NOT that lawyer's meeting with Fusion GPS head Simpson the night BEFORE and the night AFTER.

In fact, Mueller said he was not "familiar" with Fusion GPS at all.

Re: Mueller's Convenient Omission

Posted: Fri Jul 26, 2019 4:55 pm
by Clownkicker
johnforbes can't say one honest thing to defend Trump's criminal behaviors so all he can do is desperately look for loopholes to help Trump weasel out of the consequences of his criminal behavior.

He knows perfectly well that Trump and Trump Jr. colluded with Russia. We have the emails from Jr. and we have testimony about Trump's lies on Air Force 1. But though johnny knows this is true, he still tries to point his finger elsewhere trying to 'exonerate' Trump. (You know, the way Trump keeps claiming Mueller exonerated him, even after Republicans themselves said that's impossible for Mueller to have done. :laugh: )

Conservatards, you are all unintentionally hysterically funny.

Re: Mueller's Convenient Omission

Posted: Fri Jul 26, 2019 6:04 pm
by johnforbes
Hillary did collude with Russia, and she paid for the fake dossier from Trump-hater Steele.

As to Trump, Mueller's team of 19 Trump-hating lawyers spent two years and 35 million bucks and came up with nada.

Re: Mueller's Convenient Omission

Posted: Fri Jul 26, 2019 10:01 pm
by RealJustme
When the charges roll out for the government corruption and abuse of power Mueller's attorneys will justly argue Mueller is senile and was used as a pawn in the attempt to overthrow the President of the United States.

Re: Mueller's Convenient Omission

Posted: Fri Jul 26, 2019 11:09 pm
by Clownkicker
Wow, Tool, that's some of the most idiotic made up stupid shit you've come up with yet. :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

Re: Mueller's Convenient Omission

Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2019 7:53 am
by elklindo69
Question: Mr. Mueller.....did lies from Trump officials impeded your investigation?

Mr. Mueller: I would generally agree with that.

Re: Mueller's Convenient Omission

Posted: Sat Jul 27, 2019 8:18 am
by johnforbes
But Mueller admitted that NOTHING impeded his investigation, and he got tremendous cooperation from the W House.

But Mueller said he DID NOT look into Fusion GPS, although he and his staff of 19 Democrats, knew very well that the dossier was fake and paid for by Hillary.

This was a staggering waste of public time and money, and all wasted on a Democrat conspiracy theory they all knew was a lie.

Here is good advice for Democrats: STOP trying to push the Russia hoax.

It has failed and you simply look deranged.

When leftists like Chuck Todd and Chris Wallace proclaim Mueller's testimony a disaster, it is over.

Re: Mueller's Convenient Omission

Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2019 1:25 pm
by elklindo69
johnforbes wrote: Sat Jul 27, 2019 8:18 am But Mueller admitted that NOTHING impeded his investigation, and he got tremendous cooperation from the W House.
COHEN: Wasn't Attorney General Sessions following the rules and professional advice of the Department of Justice Ethics folks when he recused himself from the investigation?

MUELLER: Yes.

COHEN: And yet, the president repeatedly expressed his displeasure at Sessions' decision to follow those ethics rules, to recuse himself from oversight of that investigation. Is that not correct?

MUELLER: That's accurate, based on what is written in the report.

COHEN: And the president's reaction to the recusal, as noted in the report, Mr. Bannon recalled that the president was mad, as mad as Bannon had ever seen him, and he screamed at McGahn about how weak Sessions was. Do you recall that from the report?

MUELLER: That's in the report, yes.

COHEN:Despite knowing that Attorney General Sessions was supposed to be in -- was not supposed to be involved in the investigation, the president still tried to get the attorney general to un-recuse himself after you were appointed special counsel. Is that correct?

MUELLER: Yes.

COHEN: In fact, your investigation found that at some point after your appointment, quote, "the president called Sessions at his home and asked if he would un-recuse himself." Is that not true?

MUELLER: It's true.

COHEN: Now, that wasn't the first time the president had asked Sessions to un-recuse himself, was it?

MUELLER: I know there were at least two occasions.

COHEN: And one of them was with Flynn, and one of them was when Sessions and McGahn flew to Mar-a-Lago to meet with the president. Sessions recalled that the president pulled him aside to speak alone and suggested he should do this un-recusal act, correct?

MUELLER: Correct.

Re: Mueller's Convenient Omission

Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2019 2:24 pm
by johnforbes
Trump should have fired Sessions for recusing himself when there was no need.

That left Trump defenseless and in the gunsights of Rosenstein and Mueller, and they proved it by wasting two years on his presidency on a partisan lie (the fake dossier).

Re: Mueller's Convenient Omission

Posted: Sun Jul 28, 2019 7:20 pm
by elklindo69
johnforbes wrote: Sun Jul 28, 2019 2:24 pm Trump should have fired Sessions for recusing himself when there was no need.

That left Trump defenseless and in the gunsights of Rosenstein and Mueller, and they proved it by wasting two years on his presidency on a partisan lie (the fake dossier).
Johnnie....Sessions job was to be the Attorney General of the UNITED STATES not his consigliere.

That's the way it works.

Re: Mueller's Convenient Omission

Posted: Mon Jul 29, 2019 10:19 am
by johnforbes
In a perfect world, Elkin, you would be correct.

Alas, that is NOT the way it works.

Race-baiting partisans such as Holder and Lynch proved that.

JFK proved it by hiring his own brother RFK as Attorney General.