Political discussions about everything
By johnforbes
#117892
Mueller seemed to think he could investigate Trump Jr's brief meeting with the Russian lawyer, but NOT that lawyer's meeting with Fusion GPS head Simpson the night BEFORE and the night AFTER.

In fact, Mueller said he was not "familiar" with Fusion GPS at all.
By Clownkicker
#117894
johnforbes can't say one honest thing to defend Trump's criminal behaviors so all he can do is desperately look for loopholes to help Trump weasel out of the consequences of his criminal behavior.

He knows perfectly well that Trump and Trump Jr. colluded with Russia. We have the emails from Jr. and we have testimony about Trump's lies on Air Force 1. But though johnny knows this is true, he still tries to point his finger elsewhere trying to 'exonerate' Trump. (You know, the way Trump keeps claiming Mueller exonerated him, even after Republicans themselves said that's impossible for Mueller to have done. :laugh: )

Conservatards, you are all unintentionally hysterically funny.
By johnforbes
#117899
Hillary did collude with Russia, and she paid for the fake dossier from Trump-hater Steele.

As to Trump, Mueller's team of 19 Trump-hating lawyers spent two years and 35 million bucks and came up with nada.
User avatar
By RealJustme
#117904
When the charges roll out for the government corruption and abuse of power Mueller's attorneys will justly argue Mueller is senile and was used as a pawn in the attempt to overthrow the President of the United States.
By johnforbes
#117912
But Mueller admitted that NOTHING impeded his investigation, and he got tremendous cooperation from the W House.

But Mueller said he DID NOT look into Fusion GPS, although he and his staff of 19 Democrats, knew very well that the dossier was fake and paid for by Hillary.

This was a staggering waste of public time and money, and all wasted on a Democrat conspiracy theory they all knew was a lie.

Here is good advice for Democrats: STOP trying to push the Russia hoax.

It has failed and you simply look deranged.

When leftists like Chuck Todd and Chris Wallace proclaim Mueller's testimony a disaster, it is over.
By elklindo69
#117938
johnforbes wrote: Sat Jul 27, 2019 8:18 am But Mueller admitted that NOTHING impeded his investigation, and he got tremendous cooperation from the W House.
COHEN: Wasn't Attorney General Sessions following the rules and professional advice of the Department of Justice Ethics folks when he recused himself from the investigation?

MUELLER: Yes.

COHEN: And yet, the president repeatedly expressed his displeasure at Sessions' decision to follow those ethics rules, to recuse himself from oversight of that investigation. Is that not correct?

MUELLER: That's accurate, based on what is written in the report.

COHEN: And the president's reaction to the recusal, as noted in the report, Mr. Bannon recalled that the president was mad, as mad as Bannon had ever seen him, and he screamed at McGahn about how weak Sessions was. Do you recall that from the report?

MUELLER: That's in the report, yes.

COHEN:Despite knowing that Attorney General Sessions was supposed to be in -- was not supposed to be involved in the investigation, the president still tried to get the attorney general to un-recuse himself after you were appointed special counsel. Is that correct?

MUELLER: Yes.

COHEN: In fact, your investigation found that at some point after your appointment, quote, "the president called Sessions at his home and asked if he would un-recuse himself." Is that not true?

MUELLER: It's true.

COHEN: Now, that wasn't the first time the president had asked Sessions to un-recuse himself, was it?

MUELLER: I know there were at least two occasions.

COHEN: And one of them was with Flynn, and one of them was when Sessions and McGahn flew to Mar-a-Lago to meet with the president. Sessions recalled that the president pulled him aside to speak alone and suggested he should do this un-recusal act, correct?

MUELLER: Correct.
By johnforbes
#117939
Trump should have fired Sessions for recusing himself when there was no need.

That left Trump defenseless and in the gunsights of Rosenstein and Mueller, and they proved it by wasting two years on his presidency on a partisan lie (the fake dossier).
By elklindo69
#117956
johnforbes wrote: Sun Jul 28, 2019 2:24 pm Trump should have fired Sessions for recusing himself when there was no need.

That left Trump defenseless and in the gunsights of Rosenstein and Mueller, and they proved it by wasting two years on his presidency on a partisan lie (the fake dossier).
Johnnie....Sessions job was to be the Attorney General of the UNITED STATES not his consigliere.

That's the way it works.
By johnforbes
#117963
In a perfect world, Elkin, you would be correct.

Alas, that is NOT the way it works.

Race-baiting partisans such as Holder and Lynch proved that.

JFK proved it by hiring his own brother RFK as Attorney General.
Handling Crime in DC

So how is the Left going to fight Trump on this on[…]

"Obama-appointed Judge Engelmayer has rejecte[…]

All that we ask, on this fine forum, is that Clown[…]

Obliterated what?

Mr Forbes, after careful scrutiny of this thread, […]

Having the Clintons Testify

Having the Clintons testify about the Epstein mess[…]

Come on Elkin, if you had ever been there, you'd k[…]

Evidence from the Durham Annex

"Now evidence from the Durham annex proving t[…]

Remember Brooke Shields in her Calvin Klein Jeans?[…]