- Tue Jun 12, 2012 10:10 pm
#758
Most of you know this is not a friendly place for fake tits. I like that. I think women who get foreign objects surgically inserted into their breasts are unnatractive in so many ways. Girls, you are God's greatest creation, however your breasts look naturally is the best they can look. Imagine if men could get penis enlargements. sounds good at first but how many guys would end up with 13 inch cocks? That is the equivalent of breast implants. I feel the same way about tattoos. Stop ruining your bodies in order to achieve some fake sense of beauty that most men do not really like.
So if I could have a request for the new site, it would be to categorize the photos into many subgroups. this would have far reaching benefits. By grouping the posts into categories that reflect the type of woman, not just the type of post VW would become a much friendlier place. The negative comments would diminish greatly, as somebody who doesn't like mature, chubby, hairy, nylon, fake tits, non-nude, heavy make up, dark skinned, light skinned, c-section scar, stretch marks, pregnant or any other description would easily avoid looking at that post and would therefor be less inclined to comment. On the flip side a guy like me who has very distinct tastes could easily find the type of girls I like to look at and while saving time browsing through the ones I find appealing I would have more time to post a compliment.
Personally, I love it when a girl who posts looks like my wife: Tall, blonde, curvy, pretty face, and a little slutty. One of my fantasies is to watch her get fucked by another man who does her better than I do, which would be a challenge as I fuck like a wild animal. But sometimes I find women on the site that fit the bill and they really do things for me. If not a different category, than a universal tag system that describes things that people look for, or to avoid would greatly improve the site in so many ways. Aside from the physical description of the lady in the posts tags could also describe the nature of the photos. I like pussy, and when I scroll through a post that is what I'm looking for. By tagging things like spread, topless, stranger, panties, bikini, wet, behind and so forth we could all have an easier time finding the posts we enjoy instead of having to view each one to find out.
So if I could have a request for the new site, it would be to categorize the photos into many subgroups. this would have far reaching benefits. By grouping the posts into categories that reflect the type of woman, not just the type of post VW would become a much friendlier place. The negative comments would diminish greatly, as somebody who doesn't like mature, chubby, hairy, nylon, fake tits, non-nude, heavy make up, dark skinned, light skinned, c-section scar, stretch marks, pregnant or any other description would easily avoid looking at that post and would therefor be less inclined to comment. On the flip side a guy like me who has very distinct tastes could easily find the type of girls I like to look at and while saving time browsing through the ones I find appealing I would have more time to post a compliment.
Personally, I love it when a girl who posts looks like my wife: Tall, blonde, curvy, pretty face, and a little slutty. One of my fantasies is to watch her get fucked by another man who does her better than I do, which would be a challenge as I fuck like a wild animal. But sometimes I find women on the site that fit the bill and they really do things for me. If not a different category, than a universal tag system that describes things that people look for, or to avoid would greatly improve the site in so many ways. Aside from the physical description of the lady in the posts tags could also describe the nature of the photos. I like pussy, and when I scroll through a post that is what I'm looking for. By tagging things like spread, topless, stranger, panties, bikini, wet, behind and so forth we could all have an easier time finding the posts we enjoy instead of having to view each one to find out.
- By johnforbes