[RealJustme]

"Rather than admitting pipelines are the safest way to transport oil you make a typical liberal statement that trains would be safer if we make them safer so trains are safer. "-RealLiar

I never said that. You made it up, as you and your handlers make up nearly everything you post.

Then you admit the solution is pipelines rather than trying to make trains safer, good for you, glad I got you to change your mind.

[sillydaddy]

There is no way trains will ever be as safe or safer and more economical than a pipeline.
Common sense tells you that. I'm surprise Elk doesn't see it....then again I shouldn't be.

[RealJustme]

There is no way trains will ever be as safe or safer and more economical than a pipeline.
Common sense tells you that. I'm surprise Elk doesn't see it....then again I shouldn't be.

Very true, plus a pipeline doesn't contribute to man made global warming killing us all like trains do.

[elklindo69]

^^^^^johnny, any comments about raw stupidity for RealTool?

John has seen enough of your posts to know who has displayed raw stupidity. Rather than admitting pipelines are the safest way to transport oil you make a typical liberal statement that trains would be safer if we make them safer so trains are safer. :lol: :lol: :lol:

According to conservatives, a train derails therefore the accident demonstrates the need to build the pipeline because it is supposedly "safer" to transport oil by pipeline than by train.

However, pipelines spill even more oil than trains, and when a major pipeline spill recently occurred near the Keystone proposed route, conservatives rarely mentioned the spill and didn't once connect it to safety concerns about pipeline.

:roll:

[johnforbes]

I apologize to Clownhacker for not monitoring this forum 24 hours per day.

Unlike Clowntoker, I'm not a pot-puffing socialist.