Political discussions about everything
#87367
Trump, has full control of the House, the Senate, the Supreme Court, both chambers in 32 States and 33 governors. In a few days he'll have full control of the FBI. Once everything is in place, Trump is going to rock D.C. and make changes conservatives have only dreamed of. Comey had to removed, he already demonstrated loyalty to the D.C. establishment by giving Hillary a free pass for her criminal acts.
#87369
And yet he still can't get a fucking thing done.

Impressive....


What amazes me is RealTool is actually here cheering the day we have a dictator (one man who controls everything) and not one of the so-called conservatives here says a thing about it. :shock:

Trump supporters; whatayagonnado?
#87371
Be afraid clown, be very afraid, the conservatives are coming and there is no damn way of stopping us!!! I'd still like to pad the Supreme Court with a couple of more "conservatives who share our goals" because the extreme changes that are coming will require the Supreme Court's blessings. Mexico had better prepare for the influx of libtards that will sneaking into their country.
#87376
Hillary was coming back into the light saying she was joining the resistance
and at the same time blaming Comey for causing her the election..
Now Comey is gone and all the Demos are rallying around him, even those that wanted
him gone anyway....
So what does Hillary say now?..
does she join in and praise the man she says caused her the election? DILEMMA..DILEMMA..DILEMMA :lol: :lol:

By the way "sources say" the "resistance " doesn't want her... oy vey ! :lol: :lol:
#87398
Hillary's ghostwriter was preparing a book blaming Comey for her loss.

Now she is on the horns of a dilemma because now Dems are pretending they loved Comey all along.

Dems are being very foolish in opposing every single thing Trump does, or does not do.
#87404
What has libtards melting down is Trump's success in obtaining full control over every government agency that makes and enforces laws. Comey was the barrier to that full control, little wonder libtards are on the verge of suicide. Just look at the three on this board.
#87422
Let’s cut right to the chase: James Comey should have been fired immediately following his disastrous press briefing last July, in which he candidly laid out the case against Hillary Clinton over her mishandling of classified information and then refused to recommend charges. Overstepping his authority while radiating sanctimony, arrogating power while clumsily intervening in the election, Comey deserved to be sacked on the spot.

Everything since has been one long slow twist in the wind for Comey, a former US attorney in Manhattan, where his most notable accomplishment was sending Martha Stewart to jail.

Ignore for the moment Comey’s series of missteps resulting from the Clinton investigation and his increasingly erratic and unconvincing public fan dance as he sent the nation into electoral paroxysms over the past 10 months.

On his watch, the FBI continued its politically correct, see-no-evil attitude toward radical Islam and thus failed to prevent the atrocity in San Bernardino; it also investigated the Orlando nightclub shooter for 10 months before closing its case, allowing him to kill or wound 102 people. Meanwhile, the federal office of personnel management was hacked by the Chinese, resulting in a serious data breach. That’s failure on an unacceptable level.

Now the bureau’s tied up and bogged down in the almost certainly chimerical “Russian hacking” fantasy, which bubbled up out of the leftist fever swamp in the wake of Clinton’s loss in November, and for which there is exactly zero evidence.

So when President Trump finally put Comey out of his — and our — misery last week, it was the best merited cashiering since Truman fired a showboating MacArthur.

Ignore the political firestorm that’s followed. Trump could cure cancer, solve the Israeli-Palestinian crisis and appoint Oprah as his special envoy to Mars and the Beltway press corps would still howl for his head. The fires fueling this politically motivated hatefest will abate only when the Democrats accept that they lost an election they fully expected to win.

As the nation’s chief law-enforcement officer, the FBI director shouldn’t be a political figure.

And that’s the key word — political. As the nation’s chief law-enforcement officer, the FBI director shouldn’t be a political figure.

The bureau began as a financial-crimes investigatory arm of the justice department in 1908, and grew to maturity under J. Edgar Hoover, monitoring domestic Bolshevik radicalism in the early 1920s, then tackling interstate violent crime during the wild and woolly ’30s: the birth of the “G-Men.”

Yet the temptation to be a Washington player is always present. Hoover, who served under eight presidents and whose reign lasted until his death in 1972, amassed a storehouse of inside dirt on politicians, which made him essentially unfireable and which led to congressional insistence on Senate confirmation of future directors and 10-year term limits.

What’s needed now is a restoration of what should be the FBI’s primary mission, as it was in the early Hoover days: counterterrorism. Since the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, it’s far less important for the bureau to be chasing bank robbers in Burlington and Butte than it is for it to function as the nation’s first line of homeland security defense.

The country doesn’t need another politician, jurist or prosecutor at the bureau. It needs someone dogged, determined, experienced, impartial and fearless.

Although the parallels are not exact, historical circumstances have demanded that the FBI now function in relation to the CIA and NSA similar to the way Britain’s MI5 (domestic) and MI6 (foreign) intelligence services work together. Nearly 16 years on, the Washington establishment still hasn’t accepted that 9/11 really did fundamentally change our notions of crime, prevention and punishment.

But the American people have, which is one of the many reasons Trump won the election. Further, far from damaging the president in the eyes of his supporters, Trump’s decisiveness in canning Comey will only endear him to them even more.

So who should replace Comey? The rumor mills are already churning out names of the usual suspects: a judge (Michael J. Garcia), a prosecutor (Assistant Attorney General Alice Fisher), a politician (Sen. John Cornyn of Texas), a veteran fed (Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe) and the Richmond FBI head (Adam Lee).

But the country doesn’t need another politician, jurist or prosecutor at the bureau. It needs someone dogged, determined, experienced, impartial and fearless. Someone sworn to protect and serve, who will follow the evidence wherever it leads and make the appropriate recommendations in the name of justice. Incorruptible and impartial.
#87444
The AssClown replied to every thread except this one. Coincidence?
I think not.

The AssClown cannot refute facts and so he relies on silly ass word games.

Apparently even the queen of silly ass word games could not come up with a silly ass word game that was silly ass enough to refute these facts.

The Marxist punk bitch is punked again.
#87490
Not since the commie scare of the 1950s has there been so much irrationality and paranoia about Russia.

Fortunately, this time around it is entirely fake.

The Left doesn't believe for one second that Russia influence the election, or even that it could.

Just in October, Obama correctly derided this notion, pointing out that most vote-counting machines were not even linked to the Internet anyhow.
#87494
"Just in October, Obama correctly derided this notion, pointing out that most vote-counting machines were not even linked to the Internet anyhow."-johnflubs

Wow, even I didn't think johnfibs was that stupid.

I don't think anyone, ever, has claimed Russia messed with our voting machines. But what's incredible is that johnfoibles actually believes that's the only way to influence an election. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

(johnny, you deserve to be treated just like Loser Boy Insipid for that one; multiple emoticons for the truly stupid.)
#87515
Are you saying that Russia would like to be able to influence our elections?

Sure.

But Obama used State Dept money to try to influence the election in Israel.

Obama made TV ads against Brexit and for Macron, so he was trying hard to influence elections in England and France.

So?
#87520
So your argument is that it's just fine for Russia to clandestinely disrupt our elections because Obama made some TV ads? :shock:
Incredible.

You and Trump are pretending that what Russia did (and is doing) doesn't harm U.S. interests. It does. It threatens our democracy. You both should be upset.
Instead, Trump condones it and you shrug it off (which condones it.)
Anything Obama did doesn't threaten anyone's democracy, dummy. Making a public TV ad isn't subversive or destructive. It's up front, informs voters, and they can take it or leave it.

I missed the TV ads by Putin. So did you. What we got instead were crimes.
I'll write real slow for the retarded amongst us (those who have trouble with the concept of apples and oranges):
TV ad-- l-e-g-a-l. Hacking computers-- i-l-l-e-g-a-l.
Crimes--b-a-d for democracy. TV ads-- g-o-o-d for democracy.
See any difference, dimwit?
#87522
Of course not.

But read some George Kennan.

Or pick any theory of intl relations, and you'll note that the heads of strong nations try to influence the heads of other ones.

Am I shocked that Russia, or China, or Monaco would seek to have influence on the world stage?

No.

As for the Russia story, there's zero evidence and some anonymous source leaking to pro-Left outfits such as the Washington Post or the NY Times, let them go public and perhaps somebody will take them seriously.
#87542
This is an interesting time because big groups in America are opposing the properly elected president.

Democrats are not the loyal opposition. Instead, they oppose everything with wild fury.

Obama was a race-baiting socialist, but he never encountered this level of blind rage.

On the Repub side, there are no doubt plenty of corporate Repubs who want open borders as McCain and Graham do de facto.
#87551
Everything is playing out as Trump knew it would. To drain a swamp you have to displace lots of creatures who are going to be really desperate and mad, it's happening right before our eyes...the swamp is being drained.

Good job Trump, the more the D.C. elites and media complain and whine, the more convinced I am that you're doing the right thing. Make the bitches SCREAM!!!
Green Energy

Clean energy has gone down more than a Clinton int[…]

Red state gun murder rate....

Heavens to Betsy*, "assumptions" tend to[…]

The problem is that, once a violent personality sl[…]

Big Beautiful Ballroom

Obama and his ilk started the project, so naturall[…]

Is there a bigger cuck piece of shit?

#