Political discussions about everything
#71672
Trump knows money.

His remarks is the only serious one about debt.

What does anybody think will have to happen, at some point, with 19 trillion in debt but default or inflate our way out?

What do Bernie and Hilly plan to do except CREATE MORE DEBT?
#71728
So Trump's suggestion of defaulting on debt is a plan?

Nice one Johnnie!

:lol:

http://www.npr.org/2016/05/09/477350889 ... -explained

BQ: You're not talking about renegotiating sovereign bonds that the U.S. has already issued.

DT: No, I don't want to renegotiate the bonds, but I think you can do discounting. I think depending on where interest rates are, I think you can buy back. I'm not talking about with a renegotiation, but you can buy back at discounts, you can do things at discounts. I'm not even suggesting that we don't borrow money at very low rates long term so we don't have to worry about when they come due.
#71739
Bernie's health plan alone would cost 33 trillion over 10 years.

That is per even liberal news outlets.

Bernie wants to get 15 trillion of that in NEW taxes, leaving 17 to 18 trillion to fall from the sky.

A kid like Elkin doesn't understand that it is fundamentally bad to owe 19 trillion, as we now do.

Even worse to add on 17 trillion more.
#71746
johnforbes wrote:Bernie's health plan alone would cost 33 trillion over 10 years.

That is per even liberal news outlets.

Bernie wants to get 15 trillion of that in NEW taxes, leaving 17 to 18 trillion to fall from the sky.

A kid like Elkin doesn't understand that it is fundamentally bad to owe 19 trillion, as we now do.

Even worse to add on 17 trillion more.
Nice one Johnnie!

The math around the "projections" are so nonsensical just like Forbestardo's posts...

:lol:
#71752
elklindo69 wrote:
johnforbes wrote:Bernie's health plan alone would cost 33 trillion over 10 years.

That is per even liberal news outlets.

Bernie wants to get 15 trillion of that in NEW taxes, leaving 17 to 18 trillion to fall from the sky.

A kid like Elkin doesn't understand that it is fundamentally bad to owe 19 trillion, as we now do.

Even worse to add on 17 trillion more.
Nice one Johnnie!

The math around the "projections" are so nonsensical just like Forbestardo's posts...

:lol:
Ask Jim Cramer....yeah, that's the ticket. He will know.... :lol:
#71753
elklindo69 wrote:
The math around the "projections" are so nonsensical just like Forbestardo's posts...

:lol:
You know, for once I have to agree with Elk. For once.

You are right Elk, the projections are nonsensical....the added costs will probably be double the projections... :lol: :lol: Double LOL for that one.
#71754
Elkin, the math you make fun of is directly from the Washington Post's analysis of the Sanders plan.

Surely you realize they were talking about projections and that these figures are in TRILLIONS?

Again, little Mr Elkin, these figures come from the Washington Post.
Green Energy

Clean energy has gone down more than a Clinton int[…]

Red state gun murder rate....

Heavens to Betsy*, "assumptions" tend to[…]

The problem is that, once a violent personality sl[…]

Big Beautiful Ballroom

Obama and his ilk started the project, so naturall[…]

#