[FastFive]

Oh. Yes. Please!

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... First-Time" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I hope this lady becomes a regular. :mrgreen:

[327retro]

Damn fine looking woman but something isn't quite right. We know that Bree and a number of other exceptionally fine ladies produce studio quality photo's here.

That purple what ever above her knee in the last photo of her sent a red flag up. Non are full frame, but that's not an indicator as a lot of pure amateurs make that mistake. Still something doesn't feel right. Hope I'm wrong.

[FastFive]

I know what you mean... I get suspicious of the "too good" pics sometimes myself and do a reverse Google Image search. Often the originals turn up online somewhere, but not with these. Not saying they are automatically legit, but they aren't immediately obvious as copies either. :?

[mandadees]

I know what you mean... I get suspicious of the "too good" pics sometimes myself and do a reverse Google Image search. Often the originals turn up online somewhere, but not with these. Not saying they are automatically legit, but they aren't immediately obvious as copies either. :?

I am just going to say this. That backdrop cloth is simply dirty. I wouldn't be able to lay down dressed on that and we won't even discuss touching my bare backside on it. Ewe ewe ewe. I voted 5 stars but any girl who poses deserves a clean environment.