Political discussions about everything
#57972
Marco Rubio proved he can hang with the big hawks in his first foreign policy speech since he declared his run for president. The student has now become the teacher.Marco Rubio delivered a master class on foreign policy that spoke to the soul of Americans.

In New York City, before the Council of Foreign Relations and their foreign policy experts, Rubio showed himself to be a peer. Hillary Clinton declined to appear before the Council to answer questions.

In an hour before the Council, he spoke about everything from Filipino typhoon survivors to keeping South China Sea transit ways accessible—and at one point corrected longtime broadcaster and forum moderator Charlie Rose about the extent to which there are Iranian fighters in Iraq.

And he got into the details: he condemned Iranian efforts to develop a long-range ballistic missile capability, a specific gripe of hawkish Iranian experts that doesn’t get much attention. He said the conditions don’t exist for a two-state solution; that the VA system needs to be reformed; that he’s open to Ukraine joining NATO.

When Charlie Rose asked Rubio if he would have still invaded Iraq given the benefit of hindsight Rubio swatted it away swiftly.

“Not only would I not have been in favor of it, President Bush would not have been in favor of it,” Rubio said.

Ultimately, Rubio’s appeal for a foreign policy based in morality is the strategy most designed to pluck at the heartstrings of Americans.

Rubio hit all those notes: lofty words, with a measured tone—citing JFK and Pope Pius the 12th.

“America plays a part on the world stage for which there is no understudy,” Rubio said. He went around the world, criticising the regimes of the so-called Islamic State, Iran, Russia, China, Syria and North Korea. “Mankind remains afflicted, and… its destiny still largely remains in our hands.”

“Vulnerable nations still depend on us to deter aggression from their larger neighbors,” Rubio continued. “Oppressed peoples still turn their eyes toward our shores, wondering if we can hear their cries, wondering if we notice their afflictions.”

As a member of the Senate Foreign Relations and Intelligence Committees, Rubio is regularly briefed—often several times a week—on the hot zones of conflict around the globe. The Council which is made up of Democrats and Republicans gave Rubio a standing ovation for his masterful performance. Many in the media also joined in the standing ovation which is something almost unheard of in modern politics.
Told you guys years ago, Rubio is our next President.
#58337
So what is it?
Think about it Rubio didn't vote for war or try and convince we had to go war and we had no choice but Hillary did, soooooo why ask Rubio to explain Hillary's decision and actions? Why not ask her?
#58349
RealJustme wrote:
So what is it?
Think about it Rubio didn't vote for war or try and convince we had to go war and we had no choice but Hillary did, soooooo why ask Rubio to explain Hillary's decision and actions? Why not ask her?
You're original premise was that "Marco Rubio schools Media on Foreign Policy." Now are you reframing and redirecting the argument towards Hillary Clinton? We are discussing Rubio not Clinton. Hoax News asked a simple question which is reasonable in the context of current affairs in Iraq, because people want to know what shapes Rubio's thinking on foreign policy. And now you want to redirect to Clinton?

Rubio first claimed as in the video that he thought it was a good thing that a foreign dictator was removed from power. Then he claims that they should have never went to war? So what is it? I don't know but is it in the interest of the nation to remove world leaders that don't necessarily align with our current value system?
#58351
Rubio first claimed as in the video that he thought it was a good thing that a foreign dictator was removed from power. Then he claims that they should have never went to war? So what is it?
Are you so simple that you don't understand that both of his responses are spot on?
#58411
RealJustme wrote:
Rubio first claimed as in the video that he thought it was a good thing that a foreign dictator was removed from power. Then he claims that they should have never went to war? So what is it?
Are you so simple that you don't understand that both of his responses are spot on?
Justme has no idea that he's the tool of the DC elite who think they can police the world with the US military.

The constitution says the armed forces are to be used for 'national defense' not to defeat foreign powers who are no threat to the nation. Iraq was never a threat to the nation...
#58416
The constitution says the armed forces are to be used for 'national defense' not to defeat foreign powers who are no threat to the nation
You talking about Obama's military action against Libya? Obama did it without even going before Congress for approval
Red state gun murder rate....

Heavens to Betsy*, "assumptions" tend to[…]

The problem is that, once a violent personality sl[…]

Big Beautiful Ballroom

Obama and his ilk started the project, so naturall[…]

Is there a bigger cuck piece of shit?

Green Energy

You Clean energy guys shot yourself in the foot, w[…]

Secret Slut

When I was dating my wife I discovered she had an […]

Farewell Tour

Superb thread. When the history of the early days[…]