Political discussions about everything
By elklindo69
#54417
Anybody surprised?

:lol:

For example, In his 2001 book, The No Spin Zone: Confrontations with the Powerful and Famous in America, O'Reilly wrote, "You know that I am not easily shocked. I've reported on the ground in active war zones from El Salvador to the Falklands."

Trouble is, no U.S. reporters got to the remote islands where the fighting took place. Only about 30 British journalists, accredited by the British government, made it there. Most of the journalists dispatched to cover the bizarre conflict did so from the safe confines of Buenos Aires, 1,200 miles away.
By elklindo69
#54434
johnforbes wrote:So this is a fellow who hates Fox News, works for far-Left "Mother Jones," and has no facts whatever to back up his claim?
O'Reilly claimed he was in a war zone in his book you stupid jackass.

When you lie it's generally not a good idea to leave a paper trail...

:lol:
By johnforbes
#54437
Elkin, we all know you spend your days reading radical leftist web sites, but come on.

Mother Jones...

And what you said doesn't fit the quote.

After Brian Williams was taken down, some anti-Fox nut at Mother Jones thought he would take a try at O'R.
By johnforbes
#54455
I'm no particular fan of O'R, but last night he produced evidence showing he did exactly what he said he did.

And he never claimed to have been in the Falklands physically.

What this is is an attack by a leftist seeking O's scalp now that Williams got let go.
By elklindo69
#54462
johnforbes wrote:Elkin, we all know you spend your days reading radical leftist web sites, but come on.

Mother Jones...

And what you said doesn't fit the quote.

After Brian Williams was taken down, some anti-Fox nut at Mother Jones thought he would take a try at O'R.
KEVIN (CALLER): Hey, yeah, I have to say real quick, I've been -- I've listened to interviews from the guy that was saved and from some of the other Swift Boat, the guys in these new groups that have come on talking about it.

And if you listen to interviews with the guy, he's not smearing the guy who got the, you know, who fell in the water, but he gave a rational, cognizant explanation what happened that day, and these boats are always in pairs and packs --

O'REILLY: Right.

KEVIN: -- so they're always trying to say well, no -- well, you weren't on Kerry's you -- you -- his Swift boat. You didn't have to be. You were 20 feet away on another one.

O'REILLY: All right, let me challenge that, Kevin, from --

KEVIN: Uh-huh.

O'REILLY: -- from personal experience.

KEVIN: Sure.

O'REILLY: I -- I was in a combat situation in Argentina during the Falklands War, OK?

KEVIN: Mm-hmm.

O'REILLY: And I can tell you when the Kool-Aid hits the fan, OK, nobody is locking in on anybody else. Nobody.

KEVIN: And you're right.

O'REILLY: OK, ad --

KEVIN: I know (inaudible; overlapping dialogue)

O'REILLY: -- adrenaline -- adrenaline surges and you veterans out there listening right now, you know exactly what I'm talking about here. Adrenaline surges, your senses become very attune, much sharper than they are ordinarily, and you are locked in, focused in, on your survival and achieving the means of staying alive.

You're not watching what happens in the boat next to year. You're not watching any of that. OK? You are -- you are zeroed in on your situation.

And that's why I am believing the guys that are sitting next to this Kerry, because the guys away from him, yeah, maybe somebody looked over, and yeah, but what probably happened was after the fact people talked. And that's what always happens. And then perceptions are shaped. But they're always ab -- they're never primary source perceptions.

The Radio Factor, 8/9/04,
#54467
johnforbes is so stupid he didn't even notice that Bill O'Reilly didn't actually refute a thing Corn said in his article.

Corn never said O'Reilly wasn't in Argentina.
He said O'Reilly WAS in Argentina but not in a war zone.
O'Reilly refuted this by proving he was in Argentina, not in the war zone, and that he covered a "riot". (This is his own characterization from his letter to CBS.)

Brilliant! I'm convinced he was in Argentina but not in a war zone.
How about you johnny?

And then O'Reilly said nothing at all about the rest of his alleged lies from the article.
But you tools couldn't care less.
You're convinced by some indignant posturing, innendo, and name calling. :lol:


Ahh, the life of partisan simpletons must be wonderful.
By johnforbes
#54470
Clownhicker is called a clown and a hick for a reason.

Look, Corn (what sort of name is that?) is just a leftist looking to add O'R's scalp to Brian Williams' but with zero evidence.
#54480
johnny, O'Reilly just admitted on camera that he wasn't in the war zone in Argentina and that he was a thousand miles away covering a riot.

How much more evidence do you need than O'Reilly himself admitting he wasn't in a war zone in Argentina and that he was only covering a riot?

I'll take his word for it.

But you?
You'll copy-and-paste the same ignorant nonsense without a thought in your head about the admitted facts.
By johnforbes
#54481
What he said was that everything he said was 100 percent true.

The thing is this, Corn is a leftist and Mother Jones is a rag.

They just want some sort of revenge for Brian Williams, but in fact O'Reilly was very gentle on Williams.

By the way, Williams had a sense of humor and it wasn't as if I hated him or anything.

The REAL issue is that NBC refuses to dig into Benghazi, the IRS scandal, and the lies told about Obamacare.

The reality is nobody cares about Williams or O'Reilly.
By elklindo69
#54486
The hell with the facts, Forbestard instinctively goes for the ad hominem attack.

O'Reilly was busted in a bold faced lie and Tardo attempts to debase the source rather than the facts...
#54488
"What he said was that everything he said was 100 percent true."-johnforbes

And then he followed that with a 33 year old letter that he himself wrote saying he was covering a riot a thousand miles away from the war zone, which is not what he said previously.

He made that first statement to fool the likes of you and Tool.
Then he proceeded to give evidence that it wasn't true at all.
But because he sneered, called names, used innuendo and ad hominem comments, and then ignored all the other alleged lies completely as he pointed his finger at Al Franken (who has nothing whatsoever to do with this) you went away thinking he had refuted the charges and that everything he had said previously was true after he had just given you evidence to the contrary.

"The reality is nobody cares about Williams or O'Reilly."-johnforbes

Don't tell that to The Tool.
He believes it's proof you can't believe anything on NBC and that FOXnews is always the absolute truth, just as you appear to.
User avatar
By Malcolm
#54491
In October of 2004, the words “loofa” and “falafel” were mainstreamed into our sexual vocabulary. To the shock of some, and to the entertainment of millions, religious right wingnut Bill O'Reilly was accused of sexually harassing coworker Andrea Mackris with explicit phone conversations that were allegedly taped. Besides the use of loofas and falafels as sex objects, Bill O’Reilly had also revealed homoerotic desires to use vibrators on himself, fantasies of explicit Caribbean vacations, and a desire for Ms. Mackris to perform oral sex on him, but not finish. He also revealed some disturbing news about what Fox News was planning to do to Al Franken. To Bill O’Reilly’s enemies, this news was God sent..... :lol:

“loofa” and “falafel” bill-o is a fucking pretentious prick......
By johnforbes
#54497
All journalists want the drama of being "war reporters," and that's why Brian Williams puffed up himself.

Was any journalist reporting from the Falklands?

This is just some leftist, Corn, from the leftist rag Mother Jones trying to hurt O'Reilly because their leftist pal Brian Williams got let go.

Neither Clownslacker nor Elkin could find the Falklands on a map or even care to try.

They are just hate-infested leftist kids.
By elklindo69
#54518
johnforbes wrote:All journalists want the drama of being "war reporters," and that's why Brian Williams puffed up himself.

Was any journalist reporting from the Falklands?

This is just some leftist, Corn, from the leftist rag Mother Jones trying to hurt O'Reilly because their leftist pal Brian Williams got let go.

Neither Clownslacker nor Elkin could find the Falklands on a map or even care to try.

They are just hate-infested leftist kids.
Was O'Reilly reporting from the Falklands?

He "claimed" to have been in a "war zone."
By johnforbes
#54520
Elkin, you're driving yourself into a leftist frenzy by wasting your days reading leftist web sites.

Probably O'Reilly was talking about El Salvador. He was apparently in some riot in Argentina where soldiers pointed weapons at him and other reporters.

At least he doesn't dress like sissy Brian Williams.
By johnforbes
#54742
What is on the Fed's balance sheet?

This whole thing, with global central banks overdosing on stimulus, is a story nobody knows the end to.

Will it actually work?

Will it lead to normalized GDP globally?

Will it lead to wild inflation due to money-printing?
Red state gun murder rate....

Heavens to Betsy*, "assumptions" tend to[…]

The problem is that, once a violent personality sl[…]

Big Beautiful Ballroom

Obama and his ilk started the project, so naturall[…]

Is there a bigger cuck piece of shit?

Green Energy

You Clean energy guys shot yourself in the foot, w[…]

Secret Slut

When I was dating my wife I discovered she had an […]

Farewell Tour

Superb thread. When the history of the early days[…]

Exposing wife in phoenix

Any interested voyeurs. We are looking to expose[…]