[DarknLadyJedi]

OK, so I went over to the VC forum to see what was being said about the lack of VW and ran across an interesting post. Since I was mentioned I figured I would give my $.02 back.

1) I am not Katherine Lucas, nor am I on VW's staff.
How do I know the history and other things? I looked them up, I gave out how I found the information and I encouraged others to look it up. Stuff I didn't understand I just threw out raw numbers and hoped someone else would step in and explain it. Thankfully, people did.

Was I the first to post pictures? Yes. I also encouraged others to do the same, at the same time reminding them that this was an open forum.

And I never once told someone NOT to cancel their membership or to not do a charge back on their credit card. I pointed out that most people won't.

Hell, for less than a $5 return I'm sure not going to, and if everything Igor says is true than me doing a charge back wouldn't hurt Social Media at all. The charge back goes to the original charging company. So if you got your membership before Social Media took over they are not responsible for the charge back according to Igor.

If you looked around here and you thought Ellie wasn't a troll you are an idiot. And no, I am not just slinging insults.

And when you quoted Rugrollers, you quoted the section HE was quoting from Ellie.

You don't like people from the Middle East? Are they all terrorists? Hmmmm, does Igor know you think he is a terrorist?

The demo description; yeah, that didn't exactly blow me away either.

The Wednesday return; See my "Well..." thread for my opinion. As for anyone wanting to see my cameltoe ... I seriously doubt that.

Copyright and Public Domain. It's obvious you are a lurker who has absolutely no concept of what these things are, nor do you understand the concept of piracy most likely.

Contributor did not cash their check from January until June and got an "account closed" message. OK, so IPAY, the company that Igor claims JA had nothing to do with closed their account. If Igor is being honest what does this tell you?

Now, to a couple of people who replied:

JWJoe @ 3:19am, I have said many times all Igor has to do to convince me he is honest is to prove the proof he claimed he would. So far, he hasn't provided a single bit of it. Meanwhile all the looking I have done has consistently pointed to JA being the owner of VW and of being financially connected to VW the entire time, giving a major lie to Igor's story.

Oberon3 @ 7:54pm, hmmm, yeah, about that, nope, no argument.



Oh, I almost forgot. Where have I been all day? At work, I just don't have a Monday to Friday job.

[FAQ]

OK, so I went over to the VC forum to see what was being said about the lack of VW and ran across an interesting post. Since I was mentioned I figured I would give my $.02 back.
--snip--

This is getting real stupid. If you want to argue with someone on the VC BB, go over to the VC BB and argue there. Makes absolutely ZERO sense to reply to them here. Cross BB replies are idiotic.

We couldn't care less about what you think of someone who is not here anymore. You are only stirring more shit here, and it's starting to smell.

What's past is prologue.

[zardoz1962]

---clip---
Contributor did not cash their check from January until June and got an "account closed" message. OK, so IPAY, the company that Igor claims JA had nothing to do with closed their account. If Igor is being honest what does this tell you?
---clip---

I agree and support you on much you have written, but you do occasionally jump into the irrational defense zone.

As I recall, you yourself have tracked down the info proving that IPAY was a JA company. Other members showed the checks from 2011 showing IPAY was the payor then.

What does "If Igor is being honest what does this tell you?" mean? You have proven he is not on this point. You have proven that IPAY was a JA company. You have therefore proven that JA's company has closed their account and has failed to pay contributors what they are due.

So the real question is "If Igor is being dishonest what does this tell you?". In this case, that JA is more dishonest.

[boltupright36067]

You would not believe the amount of bullshit they have ordered.

[DarknLadyJedi]

---clip---
Contributor did not cash their check from January until June and got an "account closed" message. OK, so IPAY, the company that Igor claims JA had nothing to do with closed their account. If Igor is being honest what does this tell you?
---clip---

I agree and support you on much you have written, but you do occasionally jump into the irrational defense zone.

As I recall, you yourself have tracked down the info proving that IPAY was a JA company. Other members showed the checks from 2011 showing IPAY was the payor then.

What does "If Igor is being honest what does this tell you?" mean? You have proven he is not on this point. You have proven that IPAY was a JA company. You have therefore proven that JA's company has closed their account and has failed to pay contributors what they are due.

So the real question is "If Igor is being dishonest what does this tell you?". In this case, that JA is more dishonest.

Eh, I was on a roll. Mainly it's in response to someone buying Igor's story 100% and then blaming Social Media who didn't even exist when the check was cut for the check not cashing 6 months later.

[zardoz1962]

Eh, I was on a roll. Mainly it's in response to someone buying Igor's story 100% and then blaming Social Media who didn't even exist when the check was cut for the check not cashing 6 months later.

Yeah, easy to get into the spirit of things.