Political discussions about everything
By elklindo69
#27156
Leroy wrote:
RealJustme wrote:Despite a corrupt legal system who tried to railroad Zimmerman to set things right with blacks, Zimmerman will walk. The judge made so many errors and displayed her bias for a conviction that even if Zimmerman were to be convicted on appeal the conviction would be thrown out.

Today the Judge actually swore Zimmerman in despite his attorneys objections, the Judge told Zimmerman's attorneys to remain quite and asked Zimmerman under oath why he didn't want to testify. When Zimmerman said he wished to remain silent based upon advise of his attorneys, the Judge said he had that right and told him she would give him time to think about it. Even the prosecutor admitted he had never seen a judge take over the prosecution of the case until today.
Obama/Holder and their handlers want unrest, so that they can do things like they are trying with this as cover - creating rules that will allow 5,000 Afghan refugees into the country on a quick track, while they hope you're not paying attention.

This is all a scam, GZ is innocent, but they want as much unrest/violence from this decision as their racism can get.
Sharpton calls for peace regardless of verdict in Zimmerman trial

Prompted by a question from a viewer, Rev. Sharpton responded on Tuesday’s PoliticsNation to those publicly wondering if violence or rioting may ensue if the jury returns a not-guilty verdict in the George Zimmerman trial.
Zimmerman has pleaded not guilty to charges of second-degree murder, saying he shot Trayvon Martin in self-defense.
“Let me be very clear,” Rev. Sharpton said, “from the beginning of this when I was called [by the Martin family] and came in just to say this should go to trial and should not be decided in a police station, this family has said ‘We believe in peace, and we believe in trying the criminal justice system,’” he said.
“I went and helped to lead and organize the first big rally in Sanford, where tens of thousands of people came,” he continued. “And from that rally all the way through the rallies and the marches subsequent, leading to this trial, not one brick has been thrown, not one window broke.”
“Justice requires that we stay non-violent and not become what we fight,” he added later.

http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/07/09/sharpton ... man-trial/
By Leroy
#27157
elklindo69 wrote:
Leroy wrote:
RealJustme wrote:Despite a corrupt legal system who tried to railroad Zimmerman to set things right with blacks, Zimmerman will walk. The judge made so many errors and displayed her bias for a conviction that even if Zimmerman were to be convicted on appeal the conviction would be thrown out.

Today the Judge actually swore Zimmerman in despite his attorneys objections, the Judge told Zimmerman's attorneys to remain quite and asked Zimmerman under oath why he didn't want to testify. When Zimmerman said he wished to remain silent based upon advise of his attorneys, the Judge said he had that right and told him she would give him time to think about it. Even the prosecutor admitted he had never seen a judge take over the prosecution of the case until today.
Obama/Holder and their handlers want unrest, so that they can do things like they are trying with this as cover - creating rules that will allow 5,000 Afghan refugees into the country on a quick track, while they hope you're not paying attention.

This is all a scam, GZ is innocent, but they want as much unrest/violence from this decision as their racism can get.
Sharpton calls for peace regardless of verdict in Zimmerman trial

Prompted by a question from a viewer, Rev. Sharpton responded on Tuesday’s PoliticsNation to those publicly wondering if violence or rioting may ensue if the jury returns a not-guilty verdict in the George Zimmerman trial.
Zimmerman has pleaded not guilty to charges of second-degree murder, saying he shot Trayvon Martin in self-defense.
“Let me be very clear,” Rev. Sharpton said, “from the beginning of this when I was called [by the Martin family] and came in just to say this should go to trial and should not be decided in a police station, this family has said ‘We believe in peace, and we believe in trying the criminal justice system,’” he said.
“I went and helped to lead and organize the first big rally in Sanford, where tens of thousands of people came,” he continued. “And from that rally all the way through the rallies and the marches subsequent, leading to this trial, not one brick has been thrown, not one window broke.”
“Justice requires that we stay non-violent and not become what we fight,” he added later.

http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/07/09/sharpton ... man-trial/
And yet he will have his people bussed in to start riots, and he will not denounce the violence promoted by other blacks or the NBP.... He's a hater just like you.
User avatar
By RealJustme
#27345
Yes, Zimmerman was probably defending himself, but he was defending himself from the situation he was responsible for needlessly creating.
See even Bilbo admits Zimmerman was defending himself, he must be found not guilty.
By johnforbes
#27346
But we all know why murder 2 was the charge.

It was because the lady down there was up for reelection and she sought to appease the "minority community."

Adduced was absolutely no evidence that Zim had a depraved indifference to human life or the other criteria.

Sure, Zim created the situation, but so did Trayvon.

Trayvon got kicked out of school, he tweeted as "NO LIMIT NIGGA," and he told his friend Rachael that Zim was a "cracker."

If Zim wanted to be a cop, Trayvon wanted to be a trainee criminal with burglarly tools in his backpack.

Media outlets suggested Zim profiled Trayvon. But the only racial epithet was what Trayvon said ("cracker").
By johnforbes
#27394
Nobody here has argued that Zim should have behaved precisely as he did that night.

After all, the result helped create another mess of racial discord.

But Zim was well within his rights to check on his neighborhood, and we all need to applaud Neighborhood Watch people who do such tasks.

Trayvon had been expelled from school multiple times, tweeted as "NO LIMIT NIGGA," and tweeted about selling/buying drugs and about fighting.

Does that make it okay to shoot him for being a juvenile delinquent? Nope.

But, as the incident unfolded, there was zero evidence to support murder 2. Zero.

So then the state said, hey, how about lesser included?

In this case, the police were correct all along that it was a self-defense case and that no charges should be brought.

Race hustlers sought to build Trayvon into Rosa Parks. It didn't work.
By Clownkicker
#27420
"Nobody here has argued that Zim should have behaved precisely as he did that night."-johnforbes

Of course, this is a flat out lie, demonstrating just how out of touch with reality johnforbes is.
RealJustme and Leroy argued just that from the start.
They applauded Zimmerman's behavior from day 1.
User avatar
By RealJustme
#27425
RealJustme and Leroy argued just that from the start.
They applauded Zimmerman's behavior from day 1.
I still applaud his behavior, this is a man who took it upon himself to watch out after his neighbors, he wasn't a dime to be the neighborhood watch captain. If more citizens were like Mr. Zimmerman out communities would be better places to live. Trayvon wasn't walking on the sidewalks he was cutting inbetween houses, I applaud Mr. Zimmerman for doing what most Americans don't have the guts to do, he checked him out, all Trayvon had to say was he was taking a short cut to his dad's house instead of acting like a caveman and attacking. Two thumbs up to Zimmerman.
User avatar
By RealJustme
#27429
Thank you for showing johnforbes to be an ignorant fool, RealJustme.
How so? I agree with John I would have handled it differently also, but that doesn't mean Zimmerman committed a crime. Plus once I made the decision to shoot him, I would have emptied my gun into him rather than just firing one round, Zimmerman took a big chance by firing one round, God was watching out after him and made that one round count, other wise Trayvon would have taken the gun and blew Zimmerman's head off. Yeah I would have also done things differently.
By elklindo69
#27446
RealJustme wrote:
Thank you for showing johnforbes to be an ignorant fool, RealJustme.
How so? I agree with John I would have handled it differently also, but that doesn't mean Zimmerman committed a crime. Plus once I made the decision to shoot him, I would have emptied my gun into him rather than just firing one round, Zimmerman took a big chance by firing one round, God was watching out after him and made that one round count, other wise Trayvon would have taken the gun and blew Zimmerman's head off. Yeah I would have also done things differently.
So I suppose the only fucking guy in the history of neighborhood watch who killed an innocent person will make a training video for neighborhood watchmen regarding proper patrolling techniques???
User avatar
By RealJustme
#27447
So I suppose the only fucking guy in the history of neighborhood watch who killed an innocent person will make a training video for neighborhood watchmen regarding proper patrolling techniques???
What case are you talking about? Try to stick to the Zimmerman thread.
Big Beautiful Ballroom

Johnnie.... So it cost 400 MILLION DOLLARS […]

I hear the jury found the guy not guilty. Apparent[…]

Is there a bigger cuck piece of shit?

Green Energy

You Clean energy guys shot yourself in the foot, w[…]

Secret Slut

When I was dating my wife I discovered she had an […]

Red state gun murder rate....

So that's when Sparkles was recruited as a traitor[…]

Farewell Tour

Superb thread. When the history of the early days[…]

Exposing wife in phoenix

Any interested voyeurs. We are looking to expose[…]