[tallscguy]

Hire capable programmers.
Hire employees.
Sell the company to capable programmers who have employees.
Either allow me to view archived content in your archived content section, or I will demand my subscription back via legal channels.
Connect your database of registration data, so I do not have to register to post on the explicit BB, this BB, and visit funbags.
Connect Funbags to a forum.
Cause any site registration to autopopulate a forum registration account.
Do not require redundant registration/re-log in EVERY TIME I visit a BB page or navigate Funbags. You cannot imagine how ENORMOUSLY frustrating it is to re-register to go from page to page.

This is beyond a doubt the worst site of its kind on the internet. Why you people cannot do what you had done before and what thousands of other sites do better today is a shame. You're clearly barrelling towards bankruptcy so please sell and bring in capable talent who can provide us a moderate-to-just-bad experience, which would be several steps up from what this awful company is providing now.
Why would I visit a site that makes me INCREDIBLY ANGRY and my attorney brother in law?
Do the employees of Voyeur Web find themselves happiest when they visit web sites for entertainment and are compelled to write angry letters and connect with attorneys? Do you enjoy that? Do you think that is good, poor, or WRETCHED customer service?

FYI... I could not find a page on the explicit boards that is appropriate for comments of this nature, and the Funbags board in the explicit forum hasn't been used in months.

[VWSupport]

The entire VoyeurWeb team works very, very hard to ensure a positive experience for everyone, and I do apologize if you are not happy.

Please note, you do not have to log in every time you navigate FunBags or the Explicit BBs, this issue has to do with your personal browser cookies settings.
Please make sure that your browser is not disallowing cookies from our site.
In order to allow you to log in, we need to set a cookie in your temporary files on your computer that tells us "They have already logged in! Don't ask them again!"

Can you please check:
1: Another browser (do not use AOL browser) I recommend downloading the free Google Chrome which you can do here https://www.google.com/intl/en/chrome/browser/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
2: Anti-virus/malware settings/firewall settings
3: Cookie settings inside your browser.

Here are instructions on how to enable cookies:
http://support.google.com/accounts/bin/ ... swer=61416" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

You can also choose to have your browser save your login information if you would like, however for privacy purposes we do not do so automatically.

I am unsure why you cannot view archived content, I see that your account is functional and we do not have any unresolved tickets from you in the help support desk. Please PM me what type of errors you have that do not allow you to properly view the content as well as the URL of the page where you are specifically having trouble so I may assist you further with this.

Regarding a page on the Explicit Boards which is appropriate for comments such as these, the FunBags forum was last posted on 12-27-2012 and is continually monitored each day. You can also always use the Comments/Suggestions thread or the Problems & Glitches thread; I always monitor all of them for any questions and will be happy to answer yours as well, the community is also very helpful as well regarding these matters.

[SomeDude]

The OP just restated a subset of the points I'd recently made in recent days, just in a crabbier way. Funbags is quite broken.

Don't blame cookies. The problem is that a large number of links on funbags.com links to sites other than funbags.com. Thus you have to log in again. If you're logged into FB and the site (stupidly) links you to RC or HC, you have to log in again. The fundamental problem isn't that that login is required; it's that you changed domains across an a href and that's wrong.

The number of disconnected sites run here has always been frustrating. This Forum? Login. RC? Login. That forum? Login. FB? Login. TF? No login at all. Everyone can be "Jammer" or "Blondie". They were never connected and that's always given an amateurish impression. But I'm not so sure that tallsguy is fussing about that as much as about the newly introduced need to log in when navigating from FB to a link on FB.

That's new and that's broken. The team may work very hard, but the end result is a big step backward.

The fact that your unit testing didn't catch this kind of thing should be pretty embarrassing.

As things stand, I'm highly unlikely to renew here. I would, however, hope to get more than six months of service from the year I've paid for sites for which I registered.

[SomeDude]

Let's be serious. How seriously does VW treat their own product? Not even enough to spell their own product names correctly.

Screen Shot 2013-01-05 at 1.34.57 AM.png (33.05 KiB) Viewed 12267 times

I know that typos are cheap shots, but if you're going to "work very, very hard", it's hard to see how that would have made it past peer review before publication.

[espresso12]

Hello SomeDude,

I do totally understand your anger.
Whereas the 'other site' managed to set up a completely new system in a few months with features we don't even dream of, here they still insist doing a superhuman effort to restore an antiquated concept.
It seems, as if in their understanding it is 'out of this world' to set up a 'bubbles and lensflares' background to the main page. At least they took the absurd '2.5 million unique visitors a day' from main page, I mean how big of fools did they actually take their remaining viewers?
Kiki, don't understand me wrong, you are doing an excellent job at the front-line but it seems as if the last loyal and paying fans of this site were constantly frustrated by an incompetent management or system administration or whoever really responsible ..
Just my 2 cents

[FAQ]

Let's be serious. How seriously does VW treat their own product? Not even enough to spell their own product names correctly.
-snip-
I know that typos are cheap shots, but if you're going to "work very, very hard", it's hard to see how that would have made it past peer review before publication.

It once was the misspellings and Igorisms that gave VW personality. His misspellings were understandable given the multiple languages he learned growing up. I do not feel the same these days. It shows sloppiness, and a lack of care. A rush to publish something, anything, just beat a deadline.

Judy in The Tree
Still more Judy ... climbing around in the trees. Check them out at the Voyeur Photos Section.
See more of this hot lovely woman in our
Voyeur Photos Section

Not the voyeur section. Whoever throws together the Main Page does not look at the images, or never ventures into the sections. Clearly, no competent peer review occurs.

Then look no further than the VW Wiki. Totally trashed and spammed. If VW is not going to maintain it, delete it. It cheapens the appeal of the entire site seeing that Wiki in total disarray.

[tallscguy]

Section Contests

RedClouds Regular
Section Contests

Homeclips

These sections within Homeclips, the COMPLETE ARCHIVES, do not work. They require a subscription, even though the links themselves are within an area for which I am already subscribed.
These are ordered and organized, and best material of the site. I pay Funbags in order to see these, yet it's barred from me.
Why? When will this be fixed? What's the purpose of this?

[VWSupport]

Please provide me with specific URLs so I can assist you further and look into this for you immediately. However, please note that FunBags material for HomeClips and RedClouds is only available 60 days after it is shown on those respective sites.

[markjean59]

suggestion: remove the limit on reporting offensive comments and commentators

[rockclimber]

Im quoting myself in another thread here for Kiki to see:

Here's an idea, Introduce a human factor into the mix. I think some of the contributors who are all into the contest aspect are right. Some people seem to win a hell of a lot. and some voting doesn't follow a normal pattern. Well, if that's their thing AND it brings in better contri AND more fun cool. BUT it should be easy enough for ADMIN to poke around a little and see if Miss July is really just a cool gal with a good camera and if so well and good. But if she isn't, then shoot her off to the side with an honorable mention, no cash? She still wins something, The contri gets more exposure and the site gets more contri to share with the VW community.

I can see the laptops firing up to argue this point, but Let's see what we can do to keep the great contributors who are expressing their justifiable frustration over being edged out repeatedly by last minute voting and the repeat winners.

We don't have a pro side and shouldn't but a lot of the weekend and wine snappers here are darn good and should be in their own category. My half formed idea would be for the repeaters to be a separate category, still get prizes but cant edge out our newcomers. We want them to keep coming back and growing into repeaters, not withdrawing in frustration.

If it were up to me, I would be sure to include in each months winners at least half or one third newbies, highlight the top three repeaters and a heck of a lot of honorable mention runner ups! The more the merrier, its just pixels anyways.....

ALSO, Keep the winners contri at least PARTIALLY accessable without a funbags membership. Use it as a teaser o to speak. The winners group gets SOME of their images left unlocked indefinitely, not all, that's the hook. Here's a peek of the last 8 contri by Miss frecles and a smile BUT if you want to see ALL her old contri, well then good Sir or Madam, buck up your dues!. ALWAYS getting the screen that says no access is boring. Leave some windows open!!

[LacyTampa]

(Rockclimber) This man knows a thing to too, completely agree. You can view free porn everywhere. What made Da House/WatchCams special was not that it was only a Voyer, but the women were pretty and had a relationship of some kind with all the members. That's what kept members.