[johnforbes]

Shouldn't we all deplore this Democrat-led insurection?


"U.S. House Minority Hakeem Jeffries calls for "fighting" against Trump's agenda "in the streets."

[johnforbes]

Bump for Clown to express his outrage about this lawless Democrat urging an uprising against the properly constituted authority...

[Clownkicker]

johnny, when you can bother to post an attributed quotation from the guy, I will comment on what he said.

Instead, you posted a phrase here, a word there, from partisan hacks without any context whatsoever. You need to post something the guy actually said, in context, from a reliable source, to support your idiotic thread title.

I don't get outraged against unsupported postings on internet gossip sites the way you do. I also don't fall prey to them the way you simpletons do.

Now in Trump's case, I heard his entire speech at the oval in context for myself. I didn't get the partial quotation, out of the incomplete whitewash crap from FOXnews and OneAmericNews the way you did. That's how I know he was calling for violent attacks on police and legislators at the Capitol. That's why I am outraged about what he said. I heard it directly from the horse's ass.... uh, horse's mouth. And that's why I have no respect for tools like you who know perfectly well he called for violence but continue to pretend he didn't.

You've literally given me nothing to be outraged about here other than your childish stupidity that allows you to parrot partisan propaganda from internet gossip sites to the detriment of our country as though it were news. It isn't.

[johnforbes]

Hakeem be saying what Hakeem be saying.

Bro, don't be being "raysis" as they say on the Interwebs.

[Clownkicker]

johnforbes starts these threads to jack off to, apparently, because he still hasn't told us what he thinks Jeffries supposedly said.

It appears johnforbes got caught once again merely regurgitating made up stupid shit from another of his internet gossip sites.

[johnforbes]

Look, my brutha be saying what he be sayin'.

He not be sayin' what he not be sayin'.

Pardon the patois, but Mr Forbes is hip to the happening sounds of modern music.

[Clownkicker]

johnforbes has still not told us what Jeffries said that makes him post such unsupported partisan silliness.

How is anyone supposed to discuss an issue with Dishonestjohn when he refuses to explain what his issue is?

Or should I say, what the dependably phony issue of his handlers is.

[johnforbes]

The logic of Mr Forbes is as clear as an alpine lake.

Mr Forbes favors freedom of speech, but opposes the sort of insurrectionist rhetoric Hakeem is peddling.

[Clownkicker]

It is reassuring to hear johnforbes finally pronounce that he opposes the sort of insurrectionist rhetoric Donald Trump spewed before the election certification on January 6th.

I never thought I would see the day that partisan hack johnforbes would stab Trump in the back this way.

But like I said, it's reassuring that at least one of these reactionary simpletons would become conscious enough to realize the danger Trump's rhetoric poses to our democracy.

Now, if johnny would only tell us what Jeffries said that he thinks is so bad.

[johnforbes]

Mr Forbes does condemn the sort of cheap insurrectionist rhetoric being peddled by Hakeem and his minions.

[Clownkicker]

WHAT insurrectionist rhetoric, johnny? Are you claiming Jeffries said the same things that Trump said on January 6th? I don't believe it.

But you sure get awful upset when you don't even seem to know what is upsetting you.

I don't know what is upsetting you either because you won't tell me. How do you expect me to help you with your incessant whining and mewling when you won't tell me what's making you soil yourself on a daily basis?

[johnforbes]

It would seem that the riots of that storied January day were as nothing compared to the hot, heavy, heated rhetoric of today.

This rhetoric is invidious, infectious, insidious, intolerable, iniquitous insurrectionism.

[Clownkicker]

So johnforbes still couldn't provide a shred of evidence that Jeffries said anything remotely connected to "insurrection"

Got it.

johnforbes is ever the dependably impotent intellectual pussy.

[johnforbes]

It would appear that Clowntoker is approving this Left Wing insurrection attempt.

Mr Forbes favors the rule of law, and he favors polite civil discourse as a means of discussing the issues which divide the country.

[divermouse]

John the golden tanned muscle mouth of Russia "favors the rule of law, and he favors polite civil discourse as a means of discussing the issues which divide the country." Left out the rest of his used prairie grass male bovine statement(s) :
>As long as truth does not matter.< Proven wrong time and again. The Wack -A Mole-Russian-Lemming just loves to forget who attacked with deadly weapons our Capitol. Just like a true sparkle pony patriot. He must drink to blackout or could he really be this stupid?

[johnforbes]

Look, the facts are these:

Hakeem be sayin' what Hakeem be saying'.

Hakeem, he not be sayin' what he not be sayin'.

QED

[Clownkicker]

All I know is that johnfobes be sayin' nothin' at all, as usual.

He can't even quote what someone else allegedly said, so why would anyone expect him to post a thought of his own that wasn't merely more made up stupid shit?

[johnforbes]

Clowntoker's comments seem racist against our fine brother Hakeem.

In reality, those of us who are hip, happening, and down with the vibe in the Hood know this:

Hakeem be sayin' what Hakeem be saying'.

Hakeem, he not be sayin' what he not be sayin'.