[DangerousDi]

Check out the Vido clip today custome and all.
http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/view/317132/
Loved the song, and she did a great strip tease.

[VWSupport]

Loved the video too! The strip tease was fun, flirty, and sexy, while to sweeten the mix the videography was great as well. I am only sad she didn't ring on my doorbell this Halloween!

[DangerousDi]

KIKI did you dress up and do any strip tease for your photog?

This was the first time in years, we didn't do pics. Hubby way busy with his job.

[VWSupport]

Unfortunately I was a bit sick for this year's Halloween :cry: . Usually we throw a big "adults only" party, where all the ladies tend to show as much skin as possible (it is quite fun to watch our guests dancing and drinking in outfits that barely cover), then after they go home the hubby and I enjoy our costumes and play!

[DangerousDi]

Why does the link take one back to the home page, vs the actual link?

[VWSupport]

The video was reported as it was on another site so it had to be removed.

[Jammer]

Kiki, what is the current policy of VW towards the exclusiveness of submitted photos or videos? I know that you don't allow contributions that are taken from other sites, but what is your stance on photos/videos posted here, and at other sites by the 'owner'?

[VWSupport]

It can be hard to say who "owns" the photo when it is posted on another site and generally what occurs is that the photo turns out to be stolen, additionally those who post on various other sites tend to be professional models (which is not what we are looking for here). Being on another site in addition to being on VoyeurWeb generally disqualifies a contribution for the above reasons.

[Jammer]

I'm sorry Kiki...but I wasn't asking how or why you disqualify a contribution. I was asking what the policy is on accepting photos or videos that are not exclusive to VW as long as they are posted by the 'owner'. The reason I bring this up is because I can see nothing in the current rules for uploading content that forbids, or even discourages contributors from uploading photos they've posted somewhere else. There are a great many photos being posted to the instant tit and ass sections and some in the PS, FS and even in Redclouds, that are also posted elsewhere on the web. In some cases I know that it's the same person posting to both sites, in some cases it's clearly stolen content being posted at VW, but in many cases it's unclear as to whether the photo on VW was stolen or not. Many regular VW visitors also visit and post elsewhere, and the fact that there is a pic on another website which is identical to a pic that is posted on VW does not mean that one of those pics is a stolen pic. And it does not in any way make them professional models either.

If you were to disqualify all photos that have been previously posted anywhere, then you should clearly state in your rules at the time of upload that the content must be original and never before published anywhere else. At this time I do not believe this is stated anywhere in the upload rules for PS, FS, NIP, the tit and ass flash section, or in Redclouds.

[DangerousDi]

It is back....today, what is that about?