[johnforbes]

https://www.bitchute.com/video/T2wG4PXpyss/

[Clownkicker]

johnny, how can he "violate" a mask mandate that doesn't exist, dimwit?

And the photo wasn't taken in a school either. And there is no context for the photo. There are no children there and he isn't less than six feet from a crowd of people.

Once again your handlers at "Big Chute" are jerking you around. But now we know where you get your childish partisan propaganda, dummy.

"Big Chute"-----honestly, johnny.

[johnforbes]

Bitchute, not Big Chute.

Clowntoker's ignorance is vast, much like a Grand Canyon of stupidity.

[Clownkicker]

I just find it hilarious that you finally admitted to your Trump-supporter propaganda source for all your partisan nonsense.

It's obviously a very reliable source..... criminy, johnny, you'll swallow anything from anyone, won't you.

[johnforbes]

The video is the source, so it doesn't matter whether it is on Bitchute or pro-Democrat YouTube where it also appeared.

The video reveals Schumer and Weingarten violating the very mask mandate they demand for kids, who were always at almost zero risk of covid and tiny risk of spreading.

[Clownkicker]

johnny, what they "demand for kids" does not apply to adults, you moron. You said it yourself. "for kids" Adults can't violate a mandate that is not for adults, dimwit.

Kids need to observe the mandate because most of them aren't vaccinated yet and they could easily take the virus home from school and spread it to their families and communities. There are also a lot of long-haul cases among kids, even though they might be mild compared to adults, not to mention that there are a lot of immunocompromised kids and adult teachers and staff in elementary schools that would not be able to go to school if the rest of the kids don't need to observe rational COVID protocols.

Both Schumer and Weingarten are vaccinated and were tested just before the gathering. Therefore they must only observe the mandates that apply to adults who are vaccinated and tested. Try to use a little common sense for a change, dummy.

You really need to grow up. The object of COVID mandates is to stop the virus, not to score partisan points with your ignorance of how to fight a pandemic.

[johnforbes]

Here is Schumer doing the same thing on pro-Left YouTube:

Clown will note that he is again maskless, devoid of dancing ability, and looking ridiculous.

[Clownkicker]

It's not the video that is the problem, dimwit. The video shows what it shows.

But it's the intentionally dishonest characterization by Bitchute that it shows Schumer violating his mandate requiring children in school to wear masks, which it doesn't.

As I said, since Schumer is not a child and was not in a school in the video, he obviously wasn't violating his mandate that applies to children in schools, dimwit. That you don't grasp that fact only demonstrates your gullibility when it comes to partisan propaganda from your handlers. You'll regurgitate ANYTHING, no matter how easily it can be debunked by anyone with a brain. (That leaves you out, I know.)

No matter how many times you guzzle the partisan pablum from Bitchute, it still won't make their dishonest assertion true. And the youtube video doesn't show Schumer violating his mandate either, dummy.

[johnforbes]

What it shows is the utter hypocrisy of Dems like Schumer who don't take masks seriously for themselves and their pals.

Pelosi at the recent wedding is another example.

Kids are at almost zero covid risk -- always have been. Nor do they spread readily. Ergo, no need for a child mask mandate.

[Clownkicker]

Well, that's as close as we'll get to an admission from johnforbes that Schumer didn't violate his mask mandate for children in schools, since he is neither a child nor was he in a school.

You're welcome, johnny. I'm always happy to expose your partisan gullibility for you so that you won't remain an ignorant tool forever.

[johnforbes]

No, Schumer is not a child, although his pathetic attempt at dancing was childlike.

But he did violate the entire concept of his own mask mandate for kids -- the idea being that masks lessen potential spread of aerosolized droplets.

Schumer got a perfect score on his college boards, so he has no excuse of limited intellect for this hypocrisy.

Had Clown done the same thing, and "danced" like a wounded eel, then we all could have cut him some slack given his submaximal IQ.

But not Chuck.

[Clownkicker]

"But he did violate the entire concept of his own mask mandate for kids -- the idea being that masks lessen potential spread of aerosolized droplets."-johnfibs

No, you ignoramus, the "entire concept" is not "that masks lessen potential spread of aerosolized droplets."

The ENTIRE concept is that unvaccinated people (children) in enclosed spaces should not be allowed to spread COVID among others who might be imunocompromised (as many school children and school staff are) nor should they take COVID home to their grandparents or other family members. THAT'S the "entire concept", dimwit.

Why must you always make up stupid shit to argue your foolish partisan position, johnny?

[johnforbes]

No, unlike the Spanish Flu of 1918, covid-19 was not dangerous to kids nor could they transmit it readily.

So the only medical case for masking kids is to take their risk from almost zero to almost zero.

[Clownkicker]

"No, unlike the Spanish Flu of 1918, covid-19 was not dangerous to kids nor could they transmit it readily.
So the only medical case for masking kids is to take their risk from almost zero to almost zero."-johnfibs

Aside from the fact that COVID actually IS dangerous to kids, children in school should mask up if only to prevent exposure of school staff and other children with compromised immune systems. johnforbes apparently believes vulnerable children simply shouldn't go to school because other children are just too spoiled and selfish to wear a mask of almost zero risk to themselves in order to protect vulnerable children at high risk, as well as their communities and families.


"6,625,847 total child COVID-19 cases reported, and children represented 16.8% (6,625,857/39,397,035) of all cases
Overall rate: 8,803 cases per 100,000 children in the population" [That's nearly 9% of all children have already caught COVID.]
"Among states reporting, children ranged from 1.7%-4.1% of their total cumulated hospitalizations, and 0.1%-1.9% of all their child COVID-19 cases resulted in hospitalization"-American Academy of Pediatrics

This is what johnforbes considers "near zero risk" to children. And those numbers would all be higher if children are packed into schools unmasked. When children DID go back to school, over 1400 schools were forced to shut down the following two weeks for outbreaks that endangered other students, staff, and families. Just because few children died from COVID doesn't mean hospitalizations are insignificant.

"At this time, it appears that severe illness due to COVID-19 is uncommon among children. However, there is an urgent need to collect more data on longer-term impacts of the pandemic on children, including ways the virus may harm the long-term physical health of infected children, as well as its emotional and mental health effects."-AAofP

This is what johnforbes considers an insignificant threat worth exposing thousands of immunocompromised children and staff to. He couldn't care less about the risks of long-term physical health of infected children, nor its emotional and mental health effects. There is little downside to children wearing masks in schools, but a huge threat contributing to larger COVID spikes around the country, as we are seeing right now in mostly unvaccinated people.

[johnforbes]

Covid-19 was almost zero risk to kids, and school teachers were at almost zero risk because almost all teachers are under age 50.

Covid always posed very little risk per the CDC, to people under 60.

94 percent of the covid deaths, per the CDC, were from elderly folks with obesity and diabetes -- i.e., people in as dismal physical condition as Clowntoker.

[Clownkicker]

Geezus, dimwit, it isn't just about the risk to the kids.

Why can you not grasp how pandemics behave? Kids can catch the virus and carry it to others at risk.

The trouble is selfish, self-centered clowns like you only think of yourselves and everyone else can go fuck themselves.

One would think you would learn something of the risk when over 1400 schools had to be shut down after two weeks because of outbreaks. Clearly children can contract and transmit the virus. If they take it home, which they will, it will spread in the larger community; to people with greater risk.

For the ignoramuses here, knowingly and willfully spreading a virus is a bad thing in pandemics.

You just don't get that public health policies should not be based on what is convenient for children. Packing unvaccinated people into rooms and not observing rational pandemic protocols is just stupid. There is no other way to say it. You are utterly unable to offer any rationale to allow it. You haven't even tried, because you know it's stupid.

[johnforbes]

It that were medically accurate, I'd hasten to agree.

But that is NOT how covid-19 affects kids, who are at almost at zero risk of getting it, at almost zero risk of consequences, and don't transmit it well either.