Political discussions about everything
#57092
A Reuters investigation has found that for three years in a row, the Clinton Foundation reported to the IRS that it received zero in funds from foreign and U.S. governments, a dramatic fall-off from the tens of millions of dollars in foreign government contributions reported in preceding years. The years in question were during the time Hillary Clinton was the Secretary of State, during which accepting foreign donations would have been violations of the law if she influenced or made any decision that may have affected those countries.

The Reuters audit found those IRS filings were wrong and have now been admitted to by the Clinton Foundation. During those years several foreign governments continued to give tens of millions of dollars to Clinton Foundation period. Those governments were identified on the foundation's annually updated donor list that had been misplaced along with broad indications of how much each had cumulatively given since they began donating.

"We are prioritizing an external review to ensure the accuracy of the 990s from 2010, 2011 and 2012 and expect to refile with the IRS when the review is completed," Craig Minassian, a foundation spokesman, said in an email. He could not explain how 100's of millions in foreign donations could have been overlooked 3 years in a row but said their goal is to be 100% transparent so they will make the appropriate filings to correct the errors.
Now imagine if another tax exempt had done something similar on their tax filings and then got caught. Would the IRS just say, golly gee, you go ahead and correct your lies and we're cool with that." At some point there has to be a prosecution of these per se crimes that have been committed by the Clintons.

The Clinton people are coming out and saying Hillary wasn't involved in any decisions with countries who donated money during her time as Secretary of State. Even if that is true, how can we have a Secretary of State that can't make decisions or be involved in those decisions because she's taking money from them?
#57133
First the good news: We’re two months away from President George W. Bush’s last full day in the White House. The countdown for the end of the nightmare has begun in earnest.

Now the bad news: As Barack Obama puts together his cabinet and eyes a slew of former Clinton officials for key staff positions, it is becoming ever more apparent that all those calls for change coming from progressive circles in the U.S. – and abroad – have fallen on deaf ears.....


http://www.theguardian.com/world/1999/mar/05/eu.wto3
http://tinyurl.com/qcyj299
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Latin ... erica.html
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Trans ... anana.html
https://www.popularresistance.org/holde ... torturers/
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/1215 ... rship-case
http://stopmakingsense.org/2014/07/25/u ... nt-claims/
#57190
With Lynch now in (was even one white person considered for the job?), will Lynch launch an investigation of Hillary's extremely obvious selling of influence?
Lynch made it clear yesterday that her first mission will be to bring police departments under control and stop their abuse of power against people of color. When asked if she would open investigations into allegations against the Clinton Foundation she said that she will not be distracted by politically motivated agendas (She used Hillary's exact response to the allegations)...so I think that answers your question of what Lynch will do about Hillary's crimes. She's another black with a chip on her shoulder that will abuse her power to get payback and will do nothing to stop crimes that further the liberal agenda.
#57192
It is very revealing that Romney has IRAs.

That meant he was poor enough to qualify for one long ago.

Romney was a brilliant investor and ended up with millions in that, and other, accounts.

Good for him.

Unlike liberals, I want other people to succeed honestly, which is what Romney did.
#57226
elklindo69 wrote:Romney had at least 20 million in a retirement account(s), and is claiming that Clinton accepted bribes.

Now the kettle is calling the pot black...

:lol:
Isn't it just like clockwork? All Elk ever has is to throw up an example of some Republican or conservative "doing the same thing" in his eyes, anyway.
That is the extent of his arguments.
Never actually addresses whether or not the allegations are right or wrong...just says "Bush did it too" or some such similar bullshit.

I don't remember Romney being a sitting Secretary of State. (And taking bribes while in office.)
Bush either....neither GW or Jeb. Or Bush senior....

Romney (unless someone PROVES otherwise) acquired his wealth by his own hard work, significant risk of his own capital, thereby parlaying it into the vast fortune he now has. All legally, however distasteful it is to Elk.

Elk I have asked you before....come on you can do it.....is it wrong for a sitting Secretary of State to
#57227
(don't know what the fuck happened there....damn thing just posted in the middle of a sentence....)

Is it right orwrong for a sitting Secretary of State to be a part (principle, for that matter) of a "foundation" that accepts vast monies from foreign governments, and then fails to report such income to the IRS for three years?

Right or wrong? Explain your thinking, while you are at it.

Have you ever even heard of the concept of conflict of interest?

When Bubba looked us all in the face and stated he had not had sex with Lewinsky....flat out lied right in the camera to the entire nation, that was it for me. Never ever gain my trust again, and now it doesn't surprise me AT ALL that his "wife" is dirty too.
#57229
You are asking an emotion driven, knee jerk reactionary liberal consumed with class envy and hate for anyone who is successfull to use reason, logic and facts to support his simple minded assertion. And you are asking the stupidest person on the interwebs to boot. Elkindoofus has never had an original thought in his entire life so don't expect much in the way of a response.
#57251
500 k for a speech....hmmm.....
Why would anyone pay 500 k for a speech from Clinton? I mean, it is probably chocked full of lies...
He is a known liar, after all.

500k for a lie filled speech.....hmmm....

OH!!!! I get it...it is not for the speech!!! It is for the afterwards favor.....I see now....
#57277
tvd wrote:
elklindo69 wrote:Romney had at least 20 million in a retirement account(s), and is claiming that Clinton accepted bribes.

Now the kettle is calling the pot black...

:lol:
Isn't it just like clockwork? All Elk ever has is to throw up an example of some Republican or conservative "doing the same thing" in his eyes, anyway.
That is the extent of his arguments.
Never actually addresses whether or not the allegations are right or wrong...just says "Bush did it too" or some such similar bullshit.

I don't remember Romney being a sitting Secretary of State. (And taking bribes while in office.)
Bush either....neither GW or Jeb. Or Bush senior....

Romney (unless someone PROVES otherwise) acquired his wealth by his own hard work, significant risk of his own capital, thereby parlaying it into the vast fortune he now has. All legally, however distasteful it is to Elk.

Elk I have asked you before....come on you can do it.....is it wrong for a sitting Secretary of State to
TVD if you really think that Romney took $30000 annual contributions into a SEP IRA at his time at Bain from 85 to 99 and turned it into at least $20 million dollars, then I have this equity fund that I can recommend to you that will make at least 20% annualized returns over a 25 year period. The only person who has made such returns has a 50 plus billion dollar fortune and lives in Omaha NE.

And Romney ain't no Buffett!!!

:lol:
#57278
tvd wrote:500 k for a speech....hmmm.....
Why would anyone pay 500 k for a speech from Clinton? I mean, it is probably chocked full of lies...
He is a known liar, after all.

500k for a lie filled speech.....hmmm....

OH!!!! I get it...it is not for the speech!!! It is for the afterwards favor.....I see now....
OK...

TVD claims that a politican is a liar.

How original!!!

:lol:

Notice johnforbes is adamant denying that he has e[…]

Come on Elkin, if you had ever been there, you'd k[…]

Evidence from the Durham Annex

"Now evidence from the Durham annex proving t[…]

Remember Brooke Shields in her Calvin Klein Jeans?[…]

Mr Forbes has never cited AI. In the most charmin[…]

Obliterated what?

As if Trump wasn't using unsecured private email s[…]

Well. A lot of people say a lot of things some tr[…]