Political discussions about everything
By Leroy
#10220
So, if you worked hard at a company, an Auto-Company, and you were non-union, Obama's team steps in and invalidates your retirement plan, unless you were a Union member who's leadership paid big bucks to Obama's campaign....

Obama screwing the working man, screwing the common man, to further is plan of economic destruction and subjugation of the 99%.

"
Emails obtained by The Daily Caller show that the U.S. Treasury Department, led by Timothy Geithner, was the driving force behind terminating the pensions of 20,000 salaried retirees at the Delphi auto parts manufacturing company.

The move, made in 2009 while the Obama administration implemented its auto bailout plan, appears to have been made solely because those retirees were not members of labor unions.
"
#10222
Dogzilla wrote:Let's all vote for Mitt, so that he can move the rest of our jobs out of this country. Fuck those damn unions!
Dog, Obama has moved more jobs out of the USA than Mitt, and Obama's done it in the last three years.

Sorry, not matter how you spin it, or try and spin it, Obama is bad for the USA, for the Economy - he said we needed to be lowered to third-world status, and he's making it happen.
#10226
Dogzilla » Tue Aug 07, 2012 11:17 am



Dog Even liberals are saying odummy is bad for the country... They are not saying it directly but they are saying... Fox had a hard core liberal on the other day who had written a book about whos fault it was... He pointed to the people voteing Ojackass in saying it was their fault an idiot was put in office.. I keep seeing more and more liberals agree Obama is bad for the country. Many are business owners who are watching their business go down the crapper...
#10236
Dogzilla wrote:Either one of em are gonna be bad for the country. They both have personal agendas that are contrary to what the country needs.
I agree, both are bad, and I don't want either of them, nor do I want most of the politicians that are currently in office, but we have two viable choices - Odumbass and Romney. One of those two is less damaging to the USA in many areas than the other. One of those two won't destroy the USA because he believes the USA should fall and turn into a 3rd world country.

In every election since I was old enough to vote, I've never been able to vote (at the Presidential level) for a candidate that I really supported, supported at least 90% - unfortunately I've had to vote for the lesser of two corrupt evils, and will vote for Romney because that's how it stands again.

Obama is BAD, terrible, destructive, and his friends and associates are even worse.
#10252
namngulfvet wrote:that may be Dog but at least Mitt isnt a Marxist Commie Like Ojackass...

This is just a stupid argument....lol....what ? "At least Mitt isnt a Marxist commie like Ojackass..." lol....Just because of that you are going to vote for Romney ?

I guess George Bush was a Marxist Communist too ? He was responsible for the TARP bailout, expanded government thru medicare, and blew away our surplus for corporate welfare.

The only reason why you are voting for Romney is because you don't like Obama. You are voting for Romney not because for what he stands and believes in but because you are anti Obama. This simply shows how weak the ideology and economic principles of the republican party. If Ron Paul would be there nominee they would still vote for him.

I am voting for Obama because I believe in his policies (although not perfect) not because I don't like Romney. This is how educated and principle most liberals are compared to most (not all) republicans.
#10271
themission1428 wrote:The only reason why you are voting for Romney is because you don't like Obama. You are voting for Romney not because for what he stands and believes in but because you are anti Obama. This simply shows how weak the ideology and economic principles of the republican party. If Ron Paul would be there nominee they would still vote for him.

I am voting for Obama because I believe in his policies (although not perfect) not because I don't like Romney. This is how educated and principle most liberals are compared to most (not all) republicans.
So, you're voting for Obama because you believe in the destruction of the foundation of the USA, in spreading radical Islam through the country, in supporting the destruction of democracy around the world and using terrorism to do it, you believe in slavery and oppression, you believe in creating a two class system - those that are favored and have massive wealth, and those that have nothing except what the government provides for them, you believe in hate and oppression and violence and intolerance instead of Tolerance of those different than you....
#10298
Leroy wrote:
themission1428 wrote:The only reason why you are voting for Romney is because you don't like Obama. You are voting for Romney not because for what he stands and believes in but because you are anti Obama. This simply shows how weak the ideology and economic principles of the republican party. If Ron Paul would be there nominee they would still vote for him.

I am voting for Obama because I believe in his policies (although not perfect) not because I don't like Romney. This is how educated and principle most liberals are compared to most (not all) republicans.
So, you're voting for Obama because you believe in the destruction of the foundation of the USA, in spreading radical Islam through the country, in supporting the destruction of democracy around the world and using terrorism to do it, you believe in slavery and oppression, you believe in creating a two class system - those that are favored and have massive wealth, and those that have nothing except what the government provides for them, you believe in hate and oppression and violence and intolerance instead of Tolerance of those different than you....

All followers of this blog please read carefully the post by post here between Leroy and myself. I will expose to you that Leroy and other of his post in this site are factually wrong, factually distorted, or just plain lie.

He is hoping that other readers here who do not have time to follow politics until near the election would believe him and the republican party just because they said it. Don't believe what most that he says here because they are ideologically driven.

Read his post above that I quoted. That post of him is a response to my post. Notice how his post in respond to mine is just so far out. I will ask him to prove with reliable facts EVERY ACCUSATION he said about Obama. Just listen and analyze his response if IT CORRESPONDS TO THE LEVEL OF HIS ACCUSATIONS. You will see they do not. Please see how heavy the words that he uses (terrorist, slavery, oppression, destruction of democracy around the world, Obama is promoting hate, violence and intolerance,using terrorism to destroy foundation of America, etc.).

Very heavy right ? But see the shallowness of words and arguments that he will use to back up those accusations. Also see the spin that he will make that is made up of half truth, no facts, distraction and even more lies.

You will then see how Leroy and most of his other post here are not true.

Leroy, my man, that is a very heavy accusation you are posting. Can you back them up with concrete and reliable facts ? Please explain each line how you made that conclusion. EACH LINE OF ACCUSATION not only 1 or 2.

Your credibility here is on the line, my friend.
#10305
The mission1428
Thanks pal!!! I was, and still am waiting for leroy to give us proof that twice as many children are killed by football injurie than killed by guns. as he stated on(8/25/02, 10:02 pm) .
Also he never said where he found and posted the astounding information that Romeny had just released his tax records as he said as fact( 10/5/12 1:05pm.)
Mission, think you might have it in your heart to wait a day or so? I mean I'm fairly certain leroy is hustling his you know what off getting us on this board the facts as he demands facts, I know he has from me, he feels facts are very very inportant. I have been waiting for his answers now for 3Days! Its like I'm waiting for Santa Clause Im so eager for his responses.. So Mission, let me have My day to bask in the sun with Leroy's answers before you make your nuclear demands.. Ok, Ok???
Lets all belive Santa is real, if we all believe his answers will come!! :roll:
By Vj2
#10309
So, you're voting for Obama because you believe in the destruction of the foundation of the USA, in spreading radical Islam through the country, in supporting the destruction of democracy around the world and using terrorism to do it, you believe in slavery and oppression, you believe in creating a two class system - those that are favored and have massive wealth, and those that have nothing except what the government provides for them, you believe in hate and oppression and violence and intolerance instead of Tolerance of those different than you....
As usual you reek of hyperbole and misinformation.
#10325
Themission1428, yep I wrote:

"
So, you're voting for Obama because you believe in the destruction of the foundation of the USA, in spreading radical Islam through the country, in supporting the destruction of democracy around the world and using terrorism to do it, you believe in slavery and oppression, you believe in creating a two class system - those that are favored and have massive wealth, and those that have nothing except what the government provides for them, you believe in hate and oppression and violence and intolerance instead of Tolerance of those different than you....
"
And every bit of it can be backed up by facts, actions, and statements from the Obama administration, every bit of it.

Obama has said that the USA needs to be re-made - he doesn't like our foundation, our constitution, our founding ideals - that's destruction of the foundation of the USA. You can't tell me you've missed him saying this, you can find it online in his own words.

Spreading Radical Islam, well, you're blind if you've missed this, or just stupid - he's removed Radical Islamic groups from the terrorist list, given terrorist groups access and membership in his administration, he's denied intelligence persons the ability to use Islam and Terrorism in the same document/association in their briefings/threat assessments - he's even classified Islamic based attacks in the USA as "Workplace Violence" instead of Islamic Terrorism.

Slavery and Oppression - what do you think people are that are beholden to a system that gives them everything while taking it from others - giving them the attitude that they deserve it, that they don't have to work for it? Slaves and Oppressed people are created by that, and Obama's leading the charge - it's part of the plan to destroy the foundation of the USA.

Violence, Hate, Intolerance - you can see it in everything Obama does - he creates division in everything so that he can keep people distracted, keep people fighting each other instead of him and his administration/friends - this is a common tactic that the weak minded fall for all the time. He uses your own intolerance against you and others.

If you're too blind to see these things, well, there is no real hope for you or those like you, there are far to many examples of these things for any intelligent person to have missed them.
By Vj2
#10380
[quote="Leroy"]Themission1428, yep I
"
And every bit of it can be backed up by facts, actions, and statements from the Obama administration, every bit of it.

Obama has said that the USA needs to be re-made - he doesn't like our foundation, our constitution, our founding ideals - that's destruction of the foundation of the USA. You can't tell me you've missed him saying this, you can find it online in his own words.

Spreading Radical Islam, well, you're blind if you've missed this, or just stupid - he's removed Radical Islamic groups from the terrorist list,
Which ones Leroy? Name them please?

given terrorist groups access and membership in his administration

Which ones Leroy? Name them please?
#10635
CAIR, HAMMAS, ISNA, MB, etc... all of those groups have people working in his administration at various levels or through one layer of people to semi-hide their connection from the sheep.

As for removing Islamic groups, Obama has either removed or is actively working to remove the following from terror lists: Sudan, Taliban, MeK, Hammas,

Note that Obama had Israel put on the "state supporters of terror list" as he opens negotiations with the Muslim Brotherhood - helping the MB to overthrow Egypt.

Oh, and lets not forget that Obama has given the MB official standing as a recognized political body - as he helps them overthrow the Egyptian government.

Oh, and it was the Obama administration that pushed to have Faisal Shahzad removed from the terror watch list....

So, maybe you should look at how your hero really acts against the USA.
#10838
Dogzilla wrote:Either one of em are gonna be bad for the country. They both have personal agendas that are contrary to what the country needs.
Just as Republican Todd Akin of Missouri who said legitimate rape will not make a woman pregnant. Turns out he is a member of the House on Committee of Science and Technology.....how backwards are the views of our representatives making laws for this country.

A house of representative which has a seat on the Committee of SCIENCE and Technology would say that legitimate rape not make a woman pregnant....he must have missed his science class.... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

And how much of your taxes are being paid for his salary to have this views in Washington ? :lol: :lol: :lol:
#10847
themission1428 wrote:Just as Republican Todd Akin of Missouri who said legitimate rape will not make a woman pregnant.
And it turns out that you're a liar, dishonest to the core - since he did not say what you've written.

He actually said"

"
“First of all, from what I understand from doctors, pregnancy from rape is really rare,” Akin said. “If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.”
"
Notice how he didn't say that a woman can't get pregnant from rape - he clearly states that it's RARE - and according to most medical evidence, he's right, it is RARE. He is mistaken, completely, about the second part of his statement.

It's interesting how little you know about Science - you claim that he should know all forms/areas of Science because he sits on a Science board, but, in the real world that you don't live in, few people sitting on science boards know app disciplines of the sciences, but don't let that fact keep you from lying.
#10882
Leroy wrote:
themission1428 wrote:Just as Republican Todd Akin of Missouri who said legitimate rape will not make a woman pregnant.
And it turns out that you're a liar, dishonest to the core - since he did not say what you've written.

He actually said"

"
“First of all, from what I understand from doctors, pregnancy from rape is really rare,” Akin said. “If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.”
"
Notice how he didn't say that a woman can't get pregnant from rape - he clearly states that it's RARE - and according to most medical evidence, he's right, it is RARE. He is mistaken, completely, about the second part of his statement.

It's interesting how little you know about Science - you claim that he should know all forms/areas of Science because he sits on a Science board, but, in the real world that you don't live in, few people sitting on science boards know app disciplines of the sciences, but don't let that fact keep you from lying.

This is the problem with the majority of republicans. You like to make decisions on reproductive rights of women. You sound so casual when talking about rape.
And offering your so called "expert" interpretation of whether a woman may or may not get pregnant if they are rape legitimately.

I'm no expert and would not even try to interpret Tod Akin's idiotic statement. Why don't you try to prove it ? Is it ok if any of your loved ones or family member offer to be rape so we could see if your statement is correct ? I thought so...

Hypocrite...don't insult the intelligence of people here...
By Leroy
#10895
themission1428 wrote: I'm no expert and would not even try to interpret Tod Akin's idiotic statement. Why don't you try to prove it ? Is it ok if any of your loved ones or family member offer to be rape so we could see if your statement is correct ? I thought so...

Hypocrite...don't insult the intelligence of people here...
The insulting is from you and yours - you are assuming he meant something that he did not actually say, that you take out of context, and then you lie and misdirect about it.

I took his words for exactly what was said, you haven't.
#10932
Leroy wrote:
themission1428 wrote: I'm no expert and would not even try to interpret Tod Akin's idiotic statement. Why don't you try to prove it ? Is it ok if any of your loved ones or family member offer to be rape so we could see if your statement is correct ? I thought so...

Hypocrite...don't insult the intelligence of people here...
The insulting is from you and yours - you are assuming he meant something that he did not actually say, that you take out of context, and then you lie and misdirect about it.

I took his words for exactly what was said, you haven't.
So Leroy why are you forcing your views on women on how they should decide on their own reproductive rights ?

Why is their a double standard with Republican men to decide on women's reproductive rights and not on men having viagra, mistresses, polygamy, and domestic abuse among other things.

Don't you notice republican men impose their views on women, gay people and minorities but turn a blind eye on their own follies ? They are so extreme that they would go as far as changing the US constitution so that women can't have 100% responsibility on deciding what to do with their own bodies and gays people cannot love who they choose to love.

Why don't we change the US constitution as well banning men from becoming pedophiles or domestic abuse ?

I'm sure protecting kids and women are abuse are more important than consenting adults deciding whom to love and women making decisions on their own body ?

The only class of people that are close but not totally the same as some right wing republicans are the muslim Taliban. They love guns (republicans too), treat women as second class citizens (well...look at todd akin) , have as many wives as they want (polygamy in Utah) and are religious fanatics as well (self explanatory). The only clear difference is that republicans here love money while the talibans have chickens and camels as their currencies.... :lol: :lol: :lol:
By Leroy
#10954
I see that you still can't prove your position, that you have to divert attention away from the fact that you can't prove your side, that you're caught in another lie... Typical of you and yours.
#11000
Leroy wrote:I see that you still can't prove your position, that you have to divert attention away from the fact that you can't prove your side, that you're caught in another lie... Typical of you and yours.

Bwahaha....you didn't answer my post instead you made up another lie to divert the topic. Read my post above and answer it. Why are republican men changing the constitution to discriminate against women, gay people and minorities but they won't change the constitution to ban some republican men being pedophiles (many so called conservative in public are secretly pedophiles), polygamy (many conservative men in Utah voting republicans are practicing polygamy) and domestic abuse (Many many conservatives in the south beat their wives) ? oh...they are scared to go against their own base right ? right ? They have to protect their own right ? But with women, gay and minorities fuck them. Lets not fuck our own base. right ?
#11006
Leroy wrote:Your question is BS, there is no change to discriminate against gays...

You should seek mental health treatment.
Why is it conservative christian men are protected by republican christian men in congress ? When many of them are involved as pedophiles, adulterer, Wife beater and practicing polygamy.

But republican christian men in congress are willing to change the US Constitution to deny women of their reproductive rights, gays on whom to love and minorities.
Really ? they have to go to the extreme of changing the constitution so women can't have right to decide with their own body. And yet a christian man who is a pedophile republican politicians won't go change the constitution ?

The simple answer is : republican men don't want to fuck their own base who votes for them to congress. But women, gay and minorities it's ok we can handle them.

So why is it banning abortion is in the republican platform to b
#11007
themission1428 wrote:
Leroy wrote:Your question is BS, there is no change to discriminate against gays...

You should seek mental health treatment.
Why is it conservative christian men are protected by republican christian men in congress ? When many of them are involved as pedophiles, adulterer, Wife beater and practicing polygamy.

But republican christian men in congress are willing to change the US Constitution to deny women of their reproductive rights, gays on whom to love and minorities.
Really ? they have to go to the extreme of changing the constitution so women can't have right to decide with their own body. And yet a christian man who is a pedophile republican politicians won't go change the constitution ?

The simple answer is : republican men don't want to fuck their own base who votes for them to congress. But women, gay and minorities it's ok we can handle them.

So why is it banning abortion is in the republican platform to b
So why is it banning abortion is in the republican platform to be presented during the nomination for Romney but not banning pedophilia and banning domestic abuse and polygamy not included ? Is pedophilia and polygamy not as important as abortion ? It's because pedophilia and polygamy are committed by christian men who majority votes republican. But abortion not a single christian man is going thru it so who cares right ? What a party. Must be nice if you are a christian man to be a republican...the constitution must be on your side.
#11101
Leroy wrote:You are a lost cause.

Common Leroy prove to us here that the republican party does not hate women, gay people and minorities. The republican party just adopted in their official platform of banning abortion and gay marriage. Why don't they include banning pedophiles , polygamy and domestic violence ?

Isn't it important to protect our kids ? Isn't it important to respect women and the sanctity of marriage faithfulness and isn't it important to not hit women or wives ?

Seems to me the republican men is protecting their own base - christian men. They know they can't fuck them because they are their base. So they don't go to the extreme of changing the constitution of banning pedophelia and polygamy. But womens right to decide for their own body and gay people they go to the extreme of willing to change the constitution.

Abortion - women
Gay marriage - gay people
domestice violence - women
immigration - minorities

No christian men are affected on abortion, gay marriage, immigration and domestic violence.

But

Pedophiles, polygamy and domestice abuse - christian white men.

Oopppss the base of republican men in congress so we better not fuck them.

Common Leroy...prove to us that republican party does not hate women, gay people and minorities. Oh yeah....there are no christian white men on those groups so we can fuck them.

Oh yeah...christian men likes gun so we find a way to make gun ownership cool so our base of christian white men would be happy.
Big Beautiful Ballroom

Trump is spending 200 million of donor money on th[…]

Although much of the story is lost in the mists of[…]

Nobel Prize

Trump ended 8 wars in 9 months, and thus deserved […]

Forgotten Video Tape

When my wife and I were dating and my wife was per[…]