The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

And the hits just keep on happenen!

BY: Adam Kredo
October 28, 2016 11:22 am

Attorney General Loretta Lynch is declining to comply with an investigation by leading members of Congress about the Obama administration’s secret efforts to send Iran $1.7 billion in cash earlier this year, prompting accusations that Lynch has “pleaded the Fifth” Amendment to avoid incriminating herself over these payments, according to lawmakers and communications exclusively obtained by the Washington Free Beacon.

Sen. Marco Rubio (R., Fla.) and Rep. Mike Pompeo (R., Kan.) initially presented Lynch in October with a series of questions about how the cash payment to Iran was approved and delivered.

In an Oct. 24 response, Assistant Attorney General Peter Kadzik responded on Lynch’s behalf, refusing to answer the questions and informing the lawmakers that they are barred from publicly disclosing any details about the cash payment, which was bound up in a ransom deal aimed at freeing several American hostages from Iran.

The response from the attorney general’s office is “unacceptable” and provides evidence that Lynch has chosen to “essentially plead the fifth and refuse to respond to inquiries regarding [her] role in providing cash to the world’s foremost state sponsor of terrorism,” Rubio and Pompeo wrote on Friday in a follow-up letter to Lynch, according to a copy obtained by the Free Beacon.

The inquiry launched by the lawmakers is just one of several concurrent ongoing congressional probes aimed at unearthing a full accounting of the administration’s secret negotiations with Iran.

Put all these crooks in the same cell, lock the door and toss each one a knife.

I see, so what you're saying is Lynch DIDN'T "Plead the Fifth" and you're just making up stupid shit.

Got it.


You really need to consume something other than your partisan conspiracy nut job websites.
Your handlers are not your friends, Loser Boy.

Lynch has “pleaded the Fifth” Amendment to avoid incriminating herself over these payments, according to lawmaker

It's time to hold our government employees accountable, pleading the fifth when it comes to what they've done as part of their government jobs shouldn't be allowed.

Ahhh, the old misquoting ploy.


Tool, misquoting someone is the same as dishonestly making up stupid shit.
But you knew that already. :lol:

Clown doubles down on stupidty.

The only thing AssClown Loser Tool has is his silly ass word games.
He cannot factually rebut anything in the OP.

I don't know about what you cannot do, Assclown Loser Tool, but I factually rebutted the entire premise of this lying thread.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

From the poet Juvenal to people like Plato, great thinkers have raised this issue.

If the FBI and DoJ are controlled by politics, is America still really governed by law?

From President Grant to the first President Johnson, from Harding to Nixon, to impeached and disbarred liar Bill Clinton, to the present moment, these are serious issues.

The Supreme Court is not perfect, but it is final.

If the DoJ doesn't care about obvious matters such as the sale of the Dept of State, who does?

Here you go AssWipe AssClown Loser Tool:

http://freebeacon.com/national-security ... -payments/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Get your handlers to read it to you when they come in to change your diaper.

I already read your idiotic OP propaganda piece above.

If your comprehension is so bad that you don't see what's wrong with your thread title, then there's no hope that anyone else can explain it to you.

No amount of your silly ass word games can get you out of this AssClown Loser Tool.