The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

If Bill Clinton is living in the White House next year, 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. will have be tagged as a place where a sexual predator lives.

If Donald Trump is living in the White House next year, 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. will have be tagged as a place where a sexual predator lives.

Do you have some point to make, Tool?
You obviously have no problem with a sexual predator in the White House, so why bring it up?

So clown what you mean "tagged"

So Tool, what you mean "tagged"?

I asked you first.

You wrote it first.

Are you saying you admit you don't know what you're talking about, like always? :lol:

Are you saying you admit you don't know what you're talking about, like always?

Says the clown who asks me what it means :lol: :lol: :lol:

But I DIDN'T ask you what it means, moron. :lol:

I asked you what YOU think it means.

Or are you saying you don't know what it means so that's why you asked me? I used your wording, after all.
So if you think it means I don't know, then it must mean you don't know either. :lol:

Your level of stupidity is really incredible. You don't have the foggiest idea when you are making a fool of yourself.

I used your wording

What wording you talking about?

You two should get a suite at Trump Tower.

I'm getting the feeling rent could be getting cheaper in the next few months.

What wording YOU talking about, Tool?

What wording YOU talking about, Tool?

Me?

It was always inevitable that Hillary would use gender in this campaign.

To do that, she had to pretend Trump was either anti-female or a predator.

Given her hubby Bill, she knew predators better.

There you go, johnny.

As you said, if Hillary doesn't know a predator when she sees one, who does?
So I guess you can trust her evaluation of Trump, right?

That is, if you are so stupid you don't understand clear English right out of the horse's mouth, of course.

IF??? LMAO It's a done deal!

Hillary can be trusted to know a predator like Bill.

Or the fellow who raped the 12-year-old girl:

" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Forbes, I think we've heard enough of Trump's bragging about assaulting women.

Forbes, I think we've heard enough of Trump's bragging about assaulting women.

I haven't, where did you hear that?

It's a secret we keep from you deplorables.

We know how important he is to you, so we shield you.

Hillary can be trusted to know a predator like Bill.

Or the fellow who raped the 12-year-old girl:

" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Use your own words, Forbes.

Tell us what really happened. :lol:

It's a secret we keep from you deplorables

If you really had proof Trump bragged of assaulting women, you would present it.

"The tape is quite real and it really is shocking."-johnforbes

^^^^^Further proof johnforbes has never even talked to a lawyer in his life, let alone been to law school.
Apparently I've talked to more lawyers than johnforbes, because I wasn't shocked at all by the video of a lawyer.
That's what they are like.
But what's really amazing is that johnforbes claims he is NOT shocked by a Presidential candidate admitting to sexual assault (hey, everyone does it in locker rooms... :shock: ) but that he pretends he IS shocked by derisive laughter aimed at an incompetent prosecutor.

"Hillary did laugh, and anybody can Google that and find it instantly."-johnforbes

You really need to start listening to the evidence you produce, johnny.
Yes, in the video Hillary laughs twice. But she never laughed because she thought it was funny she got her client off. You're making up stupid shit again.

The first time she laughed was to ridicule the validity of lie detector tests. You have no problem with that, right?
That's why they generally aren't allowed in court.

The second time she laughed was to show derision for the incompetent prosecutor who destroyed or lost the piece of damning evidence against her client and thus insured a miscarriage of justice for the victim.
She never laughed about getting the guy off as you pretend.

As the defense attorney Hillary had no choice but to demand to see the evidence against her client. That the evidence no longer existed is not her fault. And laughing derisively at the miscarriage of justice because of prosecutorial incompetence is exactly what my response would be. And it's exactly what YOUR response would be.
I know this for a fact because it is exactly what you do here when a Democrat escapes justice because of prosecutorial incompetence.

I have presented it. In fact, I've C&P'd it numerous times.

That you don't know or can't understand it is one of the reasons you're a Trump Deplorable.

Young master Clowntoker, you could email me a link to your own professional web site and I'll gladly reply with mine.

Within the next hour, you can be looking at precisely what my credentials are or aren't.

How come you haven't accepted this offer long ago?

Because you aren't the least bit interesting, dimwit. Your hangup with 'credentials' is just sad.

Don't we all have enough sadness in our lives without seeking more?

You are the one hung up on them.

You mentioned it.

Then, as usual, ran away from the polite offer to find out.

johnny, I have no interest in your worthless "credentials". They are absolutely meaningless to intelligent people because you exhibit no mastery or understanding on any topic. All you have going for you is worthtless trivia.

Either you didn't go to law school and you're just a liar, or else you DID go to law school and walked away knowing nothing whatsoever about lawyers or the law.
Every post you make referencing the law in any way demonstrates that sorry fact.

You are incapable of making a cogent argument or debating an issue.
Anytime you are put on the spot because someone catches you in the most simplistic foolishness, you can't defend your position on the issue.
You can't even answer a straightforward yes or no question about your own posts.

The best thing you could do with your credentials is to roll them up and shove them in around the metal rod you already have up your ass. They might ease that nagging chafing that makes you so irritable.

Sure, you do. You are fascinated and mesmerized.

As to mastery of any particular topic, you may be closer to the mark. I'm interested in a variety of different topics, including many which never come up here.

Come on, Clowntoker, be fair to yourself. You wouldn't know who Grotius was without Googling.

As to my own posts, I could answer better about some of them if I had the time to read them.

However, I do recommend you read a book entitled Drift and Mastery.

I have presented it. In fact, I've C&P'd it numerous times.

No you haven't. Please post proof Trump said he assaulted women. Saying that some women allow stars to grab their pussies is a true statement, only someone not understanding the required elements of crime would proclaim what he said is a crime = libtard.

Some of the gals who accused Trump have already been debunked.

Of course, CNN won't be quick to mention that.

I assume it was FOX that debunked them. LOL

RealStupid......We all know that the LAW says that a man who just walks right up and grabs a woman's pussy is committing assault. Even you know that. All she has to do is say so, and the guy will be arrested.

We all know that the LAW says that a man who just walks right up and grabs a woman's pussy is committing assault.

Sure it is, but what does that have to do with what Trump said? You're blinded by your bias dude. You heard what you wanted to hear, not what he said.

ESL, Tool, ESL fer cripes sake... unless you are going to go along with Trump now in claiming he didn't actually get all that action, ever; that he's just a wussy loud-mouthed blowhard pretending all those years to have had his way with all those women?

Is that what you're going with, Tool? :lol:

Trump was a tall, rich playboy in NY.

Sure, he had fun, but CNN is just seeking to counter Bill CLinton's long history of abusing women with claims that Trump did the same.

This is good for Hillary who cannot defend her policy record, so she has no choice but to descend into the muck.

What's Trump's policy positions???

He surely didn't articulate it during the debates. He would rather distract the voters with stupid stunts. Bringing in Clinton's accusers was a bad idea...according the conservative strategists. And now Trump has crossed over into Bizzaro world. Claiming that he would order an A.G. to jail a political opponent, and that Hillary was on drugs during the debate.

And his is the individual who represents the party of "family values."

We can go on arguing and bitching at each other, but let's just face it.......This election is OVER. No.....the fat lady hasn't sung yet, but she's gargling real good for it. Trump CANNOT win, and if Hillary still has a pulse, she WILL be the POTUS. The first woman POTUS in our history.

ALSO.....I sincerely doubt that the republican party will EVER seat another President. You've simply crashed and burned, and it wasn't even Trump's doing. Trump is just a symptom of all that is causing the death of a once great party.

RIP, pubes.

Then I guess all us racists will become Democrats..... :lol: :lol:

If Killery IS elected, #1 her health is so bad she'll never make it through 4 years. Then we'll have that idiot she chose as VP to deal with.
During all this insanity and rush to the same sort of socialism that has NEVER worked anywhere it's been tried, all you libtards and RINOs will own each disaster.

During the instability caused by Killery's health and dithering about if the VP should take over, Russia, China, Iran or some other enemy state could very well make a move.

None of you simple minded Killery dupes ever thought of that, did you?

The basic position of CNN is that Trump's accusers are credible but Bill Clinton's accusers are not.

That sort of idiotic hypocrisy is the crux of the liberal position.

Trump is just a symptom of all that is causing the death of a once great party.

Trump will make America great again, don't buy the media lies that he can't win, he's our only choice and the majority of voters know that. Sure the media will scream foul when Trump wins and demand the election be invalidated, but the sooner everyone gets use to saying "President Trump" the sooner we can start getting this country back on track.

lol of course.

That’s the real issue this time,” he said. “Beating Nixon. It’s hard to even guess how much damage those bastards will do if they get in for another four years.”

The argument was familiar, I had even made it myself, here and there, but I was beginning to sense something very depressing about it. How many more of these goddamn elections are we going to have to write off as lame, but “regrettably necessary” holding actions? And how many more of these stinking double-downer sideshows will we have to go through before we can get ourselves straight enough to put together some kind of national election that will give me and the at least 20 million people I tend to agree with a chance to vote for something, instead of always being faced with that old familiar choice between the lesser of two evils?

Now with another one of these big bogus showdowns looming down on us, I can already pick up the stench of another bummer. I understand, along with a lot of other people, that the big thing this year is Beating Nixon. But that was also the big thing, as I recall, twelve years ago in 1960 – and as far as I can tell, we’ve gone from bad to worse to rotten since then, and the outlook is for more of the same.

—Hunter S. Thompson, Fear and Loathing: On the Campaign Trail ’72

http://tinyurl.com/h2zf6na

:idea:

...as I can tell, we’ve gone from bad to worse to rotten since then, and the outlook is for more of the same.

Agree, that's why Hillary must defeated.

Better go to plan B.
lol

As Wikileaks showed, Hillary had been planning all along to play the gender game.

What else did corrupt Hillary have?

She could not defend the enormous corruption of the Clinton Foundation, which took the "dead broke" Clintons from zero to 200 million in 15 years.

Now that's investing!

To use the words of other political aspirants, seems to me that "makes her smart".

Anybody who doubts Hillary and Bill are both smart is wrong.

As to Trump and his taxes, he did what we all do -- take any available legal deduction.

There is zero moral obligation to pay one penny more than you owe.

After all, Bill Clinton deducted his used underwear as a charitable donation years ago.

No one says Trump doesn't have the right to take legal deductions, dimwit.

What they do say is that he doesn't have the right to self-righteously point fingers and complain about how terrible the $20 trillion Federal debt is when he makes millions every year but never contributes a dime of his income toward reducing that debt, the way the average American does. Trump wants all the benefits but none of the responsibility, just like he did with his children.

To Trump, income tax is for suckers. And now he even wants to eliminate his inheritance tax to make sure he never contributes a nickel, even after he is dead.

Who does he think he is, GE or Boeing, for cripes sake?