The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

The 12 year old is now an adult and she wants to talk to media of how destroyed her life and humiliated her and her family in front of the jury claiming she sought attention of older men and had a reputation. The man that raped her injured her so bad she's been unable to have children, the woman broke down in tears when she heard the tape of Hillary laughing about the rapist fooled the polygraph machine and she was able to get him off.

What Hillary did to that 12 year is factual and on the record but yet Hillary says we "must believe" that Trump actually called a woman that gained weight 20 years a "PIG" therefore he's anti woman and not fit to be President.

To me, there is no doubt which person has done more damages to women.

CNN claims Hillary was justified in bring up the 12 year old's questionable background during the trial, she may have "led the men on who raped her".

Juanita Broderick wanted it too. Bill could tell.

Such pure bullshit!

Just recently, this woman who was the rape victim was speaking on audiotape.

She didn't sound sophisticated enough to lead anybody on, so perhaps that's why Hillary had so little concern about her.

CNN's John King did not get too many closeups today during his show...which must have irritated him to no end..

that's because CNN was broadcasting outdoors at the site of the VP debates....and there was a Trump supporter

directly behind King holding up a Trump sign.... :lol: :lol:

That's CNN for you. They're out trying to rile up the black men by editing police shooting video to remove the parts where the police are yelling at the man to drop the gun before they shoot him. Now what would be a legit news reason for doing that?

CNN may even be more biased for Hillary than the NY Times, USA Today, and Washington Post, all of which have gone wild in their efforts to destroy Trump.

Journalism died in 2008, and it surely remains dead this year.

It's just like hypocrite johnforbes to be whining and moaning about how the media have "gone wild in their efforts to destroy Trump".

And why does he think that?
Because he believes they aren't trying hard enough to destroy Clinton. :lol:

If he thought they were being kind to Trump and unkind to Hillary, then he would think all is right with the world.
He wouldn't make a single post about media unfairness.
Just like he hasn't yet started a single thread demanding to see Trump's SATs that were supposedly so crucial to Obama being qualified to be President that he started threads and posted about it dozens of times. He's STILL posting about it.

Fucking hypocrite.....

Whining and moaning?

Heavens to Betsy, young man, I was making valid points.

Taking a valid viewpoint, and dishonestly trying to pin a label on it such as "whining," is a very poor argumentative device.

So, Clowntoker, stop whining and moaning.

You're a hoot, johnny. "Valid points" :lol:

No, you do what all the reactionaries here do: you make PARTISAN points and ignore the rest of the facts that you are quite aware of when they are inconvenient to you.
"Valid points" to you means you pretend they are "valid" now but they magically weren't "valid" last year or five years ago; the same facts that you railed against previously because those times it wasn't your guy.
That makes you nothing but a whining partisan hack, as well as a hypocrite.

Go ahead, johnny, make a post demanding to see Trump's SATs and keep harping on it with multiple threads and dozens of posts claiming no one should vote for Trump until he does and that his refusal to reveal them suggests Trump is unfit for office.
Until you do that simple thing, you're just another fart in the wind.

Why, thanks.

My goal here is to enlighten those with lives cloaked in darkness and ignorance, such as young master Clowntoker.

Along with that enlightenment (did Voltaire provide more?), there is also amusement.