The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

Clear, incontrovertible (Elkindoofus and Running LapDogshitzilla, that means you can't argue about it because it's the truth) evidence emerges of the LameStream media's anti Trump bias.

REUTERS ORDERS CAMERAMAN TO KILL POSITIVE TRUMP FOOTAGE
Shock example of media censorship caught on tape

A shock example of anti-Trump media censorship was caught on tape when Reuters ordered its cameraman to cut live footage of Trump receiving praise from African-American Bishop Wayne T. Jackson in Detroit.

The incident occurred as Jackson presented Trump with a shawl, a bible, and offered his prayers as the black audience cheered and clapped.

Perhaps aware of the devastating impact the optics of this moment would have on the media’s efforts to demonize Trump as a racist bigot, a voice is heard off-camera saying, “He’s getting a shawl!”
The cameraman then says, “I’m shooting this, I don’t care what they say….I’ll take a demotion for this…. you?”
“Shut it down,” insists the director,” followed by another voice asking, “Shut this down?”
“Yes Michael, do it,” orders the director.
We then hear the word “blackout” and the camera shakes before the live feed is cut.

“Reuters was primary video feed for the event, all other video delivery services were coming from the Reuters feed. When Reuters shut down, all other outlets lost the broadcast,” reports the Conservative Treehouse.
Right Side Broadcasting responded to the controversy by offering the cameraman a job, promising to pay him much more than Reuters.

This is by no means the first example of media censorship when it comes to coverage of Trump’s live events.
Last month, we reported on how ABC cut the live feed of Trump’s event in Daytona Beach, Florida right as Trump began to talk about Hillary Clinton’s connection to ISIS.

Last month, CNN reporter Brianna Keilar began talking about Hillary’s support for anti-crime legislation in the 90’s which contributed to the “mass incarceration” of black people before the video was immediately cut.
As Justin Raimondo revealed in an article for the LA Times, the mainstream media has openly dispensed with the pretense objectivity during this election cycle in an attempt to sink Trump’s campaign.

Watch video of the discussion between producers and the cameraman here:
http://www.infowars.com/shut-it-down-re ... p-footage/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The usual suspects will do what they always do, deride the source while being unable to refute the evidence.

Journalism began to die in 2008 when the mainstream media fell in love with half-minority full-socialist Barry O.

Give the NY Times some credit for honesty for admitting on its front page that it was biased against Trump.

Not that it was any secret, but any tiny bit of honesty from the anti-Trump media outlets is welcome.

Media bias...claimed by the biased right wing media.

Talk about the pot calling the kettle black.

Right wing idiocy on steroids!

:lol:

As usual Elkindoofus, the stupidest person on the internet, comprehends nothing.

"Diehard Trump Voters Confirm Rest Of Nation Should Stop Wasting Time Trying To Reach Them
‘If Anything Could Change Our Minds, It Would’ve Happened By Now,’ Say Candidate’s Supporters"

Trump voters claim they will never be swayed by anything, no matter how bad the truth about Trump is:

"“You can keep writing editorials, running ads, and arguing with us at the dinner table or online, but honestly, at this point, it won’t make a bit of difference,” said diehard Trump supporter Bryan Gallagher, 66, who remarked that it had been “a complete waste of time” when 50 top GOP foreign policy experts published an open letter earlier this month suggesting a Trump presidency would gravely endanger national security, noting that he and everyone else who currently backs Trump is “in it for the long haul.” “You really have no chance of winning us over. You could bring out every living four-star general and have them list all the ways Trump would harm our country’s well-being, and we still wouldn’t budge.”

“Do you really think you’re going to come up with some new criticism of his policies or his preparedness that will finally make us reconsider our votes?” Gallagher continued. “Please, you should all just save yourself the effort.”"

Here's proof.
http://www.theonion.com/article/diehard ... d-st-53585

Loser Boy Assclown Insipid will do what he always does, deride the source while being unable to refute the evidence of the ignorance and stupidity of Trump supporters.

Nobody read all that but thanks for wasting a half hour of your time.

Once again AssClown Loser Unlucky Tool cannot refute a single point in the OP.
His masters are not happy.

OP.....so much for the freedom of the press..... :lol: :lol:

Then Clown comes back with a response attacking Trump supporters..

I do believe Clown has lost what flimsy grasp he had on reality :lol: :lol:

:lol: :lol: It takes Loser Boy Insipid a half hour to copy-and-paste and article. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

What a stupid fucker.
Notice neither he nor sillydoofus could refute a thing I posted. :lol: :lol: :lol:

What, pray tell, is a "foreign policy expert"?

After 9/11, Hillary said Islamic profiling might be necessary.

Today, Hillary wants to bring in 650,000 more uncheckable Syrians.

She wants open borders.

She does not want E-Verify to be mandatory.

In other words, Hillary wants the US to look like weak, stagnant, terrorist attack-ridden Europe.

Clown..Refute what?.......That Trump has loyal supporters?

Hillary does too.....what's your point?

OK, silly, you asked ME "Refute what?"

Now, ask Loser Boy Insipid the same thing.

You can't debate a tool like AssClown Loser Unlucky Tool.
All he has are insults and silly ass word games.
And emotions. Unlimited, free emoticons.

Clownkicker is one of the very few sane individuals here.

The sad thing is that I posted something from The Onion and none of these clowns could tell the difference between it and their regular 'news sources', like the idiocy Insipid posted in the OP.

No matter how many times I unmask the lies they are fed, it still doesn't occur to any of them to question the truth of the next silly story from the same sources they already know lied to them repeatedly.

Clowntoker's sanity is indeed a marvel.

In fact, a thinly disguised novel was written about him -- One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest.

Here's Johnny!

“The story is told that when johnforbes was a child his cousins emptied his Christmas stocking and replaced the gifts with horse manure. johnforbes took one look and bolted for the door, eyes glittering with excitement. 'Wait, johnforbes, where are you going? What did ol' Santa bring you?' According to the story johnforbes paused at the door for a piece of rope. 'Brought me a bran'-new pony but he got away. I'll catch 'em if I hurry.' And ever since then it seemed that johhnforbes had been accepting more than his share of hardship as good fortune, and more than his share of shit as a sign of Shetland ponies just around the corner, Thoroughbred stallions just up the road.”


Sometimes john lives in the country
Sometimes john lives in town
Sometimes john takes a great notion
To jump into the river an’ drown

^^^^^^^^^^^

If ANYBODY would know about horse shit, It will be you.
In fact, with Google's help, you will be even more the EXPERT!

^^^^^^^^^^^

If ANYBODY would be ignorant of nearly everything, it will be you.
In fact, with your insane aversion to and contempt for even Google's ridiculously simple help, you will remain the IGNORAMUS permanently!

Those Kesey remarks were somewhat sleazy and Clown's pulmonary status wheezy.

Clownkicker wrote:^^^^^^^^^^^

If ANYBODY would be ignorant of nearly everything, it will be you.
In fact, with your insane aversion to and contempt for even Google's ridiculously simple help, you will remain the IGNORAMUS permanently!

Again, even tho I have posted it many times, Clown-moid misses the point.

I have NO aversion to Google. I use it all the time. It is my home page.

What I have a problem with, for the umpteenth time, it that you come off as an expert on EVERYTHING, yet you get most of what you post from Google.
You Google it, and post it up AS IF YOU KNEW ALL ALONG. And then call everyone else stupid.

As I have said before....no one can be an expert on everything which you portray yourself to be.

Shit one time you even responded...."I can't help if it if I am smart. I know things. Too bad you don't." or some such shit.
Nope, you are quite the fake. Quite the fake.

See, tvdodo, that's what makes you such a hypocritical moron.
You have no problem believing johnforbes read Kesey, but for some reason you refuse to believe that just possibly I might have read Kesey.

That's certifiable mental illness you have there, dimwit.
And I didn't need to look up that sad fact on google.

Ironically, it is far more likely that I have read Sometimes a Great Notion than it is our snooty johnforbes bothered to read Cuckoo's Nest.
And it is far more likely that johnforbes read Cuckoo's Nest than that you've ever read any Kesey at all.
Being illiterate, you probably didn't even see either movie, and that's something even brain dead people can manage.

Well.. Is this where Clown got the idea for his name....from this clown? :lol: :lol:

Clown-moid's mom/hero/Oedipus fixation. Plus it works in the Kesey angle....

^^^^^Ya gotta laugh at how these clowns impotently give up when they're caught with their hypocritical pants down.
They've never read a book themselves so they are amazed whenever they meet someone who has. :lol:

I just can't figure out why someone reading a book pisses them off so much.
Why is literacy such a threat to them?
And why aren't they threatened by the likes of swishy johnforbes when HE reads something? :lol:

I resent that.

The last book I read was a Batman epic.

No, wait, it was by Mark Twain (the father of Shania Twain).

It is just amazing to me to see such a self important guy like Clown-moid come across as being so right when he is actually so wrong.
It is unbelievable how wrong he is. And I know, because I am the one he is wrong about.

He says I am a hypocrite because I didn't jump both Forbes AND him for some obscure reference to Cuckoo's Nest.
(Or whatever).
When I read both posts, I completely discounted, paid no attention, and could have cared less about the reference to such literature from BOTH posts. Couldn't have paid less attention.
So how is it that if I paid NO ATTENTION to either post, that I am a hypocrite? Seems like I would have had to paid attention to one post, commented on it, and ignored the other.
Truth is, I ignored them both, with regard to the literature reference.

What I did post on is only this: That Clown-moid's post had a reference to horse shit in it, and that he should be an expert on horse shit. Even without Google....since he flings so much of it on this board.

With that settled:

Now, why are you so much smarter than me for reading Kesey? I don't give a crap if you two suck each others dicks over a rousing Jeopardy match. I don't care if you try to best each other with who can write the best "Roses are red" poem. It makes not one whit of a difference to me.

But why am I dumb and you are smart for reading Kesey? Let me put it this way; YOU are dumb and I am smart for reading and studying the 2005 Evinrude DI outboard motor service manual from cover to cover. There. I am smarter than you for having done just that.

And I am damn sure that I have made more money from knowledge gained from that manual than from ANY lesson you learned from Kesey. How much money did you pocket from reading Cuckoo's Nest? Yeah, that's what I thought.

So, I am smarter than you....na na na na na.

Oh yeah....

And Damn! That injun, chief crazy horse, that redskin, was strong!!!! I don't believe it tho, I bet it was a Styrofoam bathroom fixture model.....

No one but Clown-moid is smart. No one but Clown....he is the horse's shit, the best road apple on the 'net.

^^^^Look at this clown tvdummy go all spastic on me again. :lol:

And why?
Because he's ignorant and I'm not.
He can't believe anyone has ever read a book or watched the news or that they could have possibly benefited from a broad liberal arts education.

It is truly inconceivable that anyone would consider knowledge a bad thing the way tvdimwit does.
It is inconceivable that anyone would go ballistic and choose to harass a person because that person knows something he doesn't.
And it's mystifying why someone would consider providing evidence to back up one's statements to be a bad thing.
But that is what has become of conservatives these days. They actually HATE knowledge and intelligence, and angry psycho clowns like tvd and Insipid are the proof of it.

Wonder if Reuters would have ordered its cameraman to cut live footage if the blacks were calling Trump a racist? Libtards hate it when blacks go off of the plantation.

^^^^ Well, congratulations Insipid, you suckered RealTool into your moronic story. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

But then, it doesn't take much to sucker The Tool, does it? :lol: :lol: :lol:

I apologize for the factual error.

Mark Twain was actually Shania Twain's grandfather.