The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

She's the sister of ambassador Stevens who was killed in Benghazi, wonder what that's all about?

I think she wants to find out for herself if Hillary was responsible for her brother's death.....

We all know that consult jobs in D.C. are nothing more than repaying (or buying) favors by providing huge amounts of money in the pretense of a salary for words of wisdom.

In other words, you didn't "wonder what that's all about" did you, Tool?

This thread is just more partisan trolling, trying to smear Democrats with innuendo over the exact same things Republicans are doing.

In other words, you didn't "wonder what that's all about" did you, Tool?

Yes I wonder what's in it for Clinton, the Clintons don't hand out high paying do nothing jobs unless there's something in it for them. It's clear what Anne got out of the deal.

Human nature being what it is....

I would say neither trusts the other....

So it appears me, to be a keep your friends close and your enemies closer kinda thing....for both.

This Anne Stevens, RealJustFreedManIntrepidMe?

"The sister of the U.S. ambassador to Libya killed in Benghazi said she doesn’t blame Hillary Clinton for Chris Stevens’ death, instead pointing to Congress for under-budgeting the State Department.
“I do not blame Hillary Clinton or Leon Panetta (for Stevens’ death). They were balancing security efforts at embassies and missions around the world,” Dr. Anne Stevens, who has acted as a spokesperson for the family, said in an interview with the New Yorker published Tuesday.

“But what was the underlying cause? Perhaps if Congress had provided a budget to increase security for all missions around the world, then some of the requests for more security in Libya would have been granted. Certainly the State Department is underbudgeted,” she added. “I would love to hear they are drastically increasing the budget.”

http://fox2now.com/2016/06/29/chris-ste ... -benghazi/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;





As usual, the only ones you've spooled up are your ignorati brethren. :lol:

She's delusional.

Weren't about 600 requests for added security made in re that embassy outpost?

Other nations with better sense, such as the UK, withdrew in the face of the danger.

Hillary didn't protect the outpost, didn't send help, let the brave 4 men die, and then lied about it.

She's delusional.

Apparently life time financial security can buy some people.

Try again, Forbes.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 ... te-depart/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


If you'll notice, that's the reliably conservative Times, not the Post. lol

Grog, it is you who will have to try again.

That's been a Democrat talking point for ages, and long ago debunked.

Money didn't stop Hillary from protecting that outpost and everybody knows it.

Nor did it make her not even try to help those 4 brave men who fought and died over 13 hours.

Nor did lack of money make her lie about a video.

No. It wasn't debunked. That's why I linked you to the Washington TIMES. :lol:

In order to save the Fox-loved "hard-earned taxpayer dollars" the GOP-controlled House cut funding for embassy and diplomatic security.

YOU people wanted to save money. YOU people broke it, YOU people bought it.

That was an old article.

And that line of defense was long ago debunked.

There were approx 600 requests for beefing up.

Then came the deaths, and then no help, and then lies about a video.

Yes, it was old. So was the Benghazi thing. The article told us what led to the death of the "four brave Americans."

It was the GOP-controlled congress that was bowing to the demands of the Tea Party.

And yes, there were requests to beef up and enhance security. The GOP-controlled House wouldn't and didn't allocate the money to pay for the upgrades the diplomatic staff requested.

That's a fact. Not belief or hope. Fact.

Grog, being a Canuckistanian, has no vote and his opinion on matters pertaining to the U.S. is irrelevant. As is his pathetic excuse for a country.

Now, if we want to know about snow shoes, sled dogs or kosher wool underwear we'll consult Grog.

Otherwise, STFU Jewboy.

Grog isn't even up to date on his dishonest talking points.

It has been years since the Left tried to blame lack of budget for its total, complete, and abysmal failure to secure that outpost.

It was NOT a lack of money; it was a lack of attention.

Stevens was probably there to discuss running arms to Syria, but set that aside.

Other, more sensible nations had left Libya (e.g., the UK) as security concerns mounted.

Hillary didn't secure the outpost, didn't send help, let 4 brave men fight for 13 hours and die, then she lied about it for political reasons.

Forget Dems and Repubs; what sort of human being looks a grieving mother in the eye and lies?

Libtards' excuse for the killing at the embassy was that Congress didn't give them enough money to properly run and protect it. Even if you accept that, then that means the Obama Admin and Hillary knew they couldn't protect our people but put them there anyway. Now watch for libtards to come back and argue, "Well they didn't know they were unfunded by Congress until after the attack"