Page 1 of 1
Gays distrubed by Obama's implication about them
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2016 10:02 pm
by RealJustme
Obama: This was an attack on all of us.
:shock:
Now why would Obama go out of his way to point out even gays are one of us? Was it a slip of the tongue or just a poorly written part of his speech? Imagine if Trump had made that statement, and for you libtards that don't think he said it, here's the link.
http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016 ... -shooting/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Gays distrubed by Obama's implication about them
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2016 11:04 pm
by Clownkicker
Tool, you really need to schedule at least another year of ESL classes.
It's not just the finer points of English you don't understand.
It's some of the most basic semantics that thoroughly escape your grasp.
Re: Gays distrubed by Obama's implication about them
Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2016 6:03 am
by johnforbes
Come on, Clownhicker, just last week you couldn't figure out plural from possessive.
Re: Gays distrubed by Obama's implication about them
Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2016 7:21 am
by RealJustme
Obama: This was an attack on all of us.
Now why would he say such a stupid thing?
Translation = I even count gays as Americans
So far no apology and the media is giving him a free pass.
Re: Gays distrubed by Obama's implication about them
Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2016 7:40 am
by RealJustme
Come on libtards, if we're going to play the PC game, everyone has to play, even libtard politicians. I don't care what he meant, the way I read it, Obama was insensitive to gays. The media would be running with it had Trump said it and then it would be on the front pages of the New York Times and libtards would be in shock.
Re: Gays distrubed by Obama's implication about them
Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2016 9:20 am
by Clownkicker
johnny, that was simply a case where I rewrote the sentence before posting it and didn't proofread adequately after the change, just as you frequently do.
Even you know that I know how to use the possessive. RealTool consistently shows us he doesn't understand English, let alone know how to write it.
But don't talk to me about this, dimwit. Talk to RealTool.
If you think he has a point here, support him and tell us why.
But you won't, of course, because you know he doesn't understand simple English and he's pushing a supposed "Gotcha!" that makes him look like a fool.
C'mon, johnny, grow a pair and support RealTool on this. Don't just dishonestly flap your gums at me. :lol:
Re: Gays distrubed by Obama's implication about them
Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2016 4:37 pm
by johnforbes
Well, all of my sentences come with the old business caveat: "Dictated but not read."
My suspicion is that Clownhicker's come with the warning: "Dictated but not thought about."