The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

No duh, they know who will keep their gravy train going! Plus they own the Clintons.

Defense industry donors prefer Hillary and Bernie over GOP rivals. The defense industry prefers Democrats Hillary Clinton and Sen. Bernie Sanders over their GOP counterparts. According to an analysis by the Center for Public Integrity, Hillary Clinton has collected the most campaign contributions from employees of the 50 largest Pentagon contractors over a 14-month period ending in February.

Not only that, but Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont--the same Sen. Bernie Sanders comes in at No. 2, edging out hawkish Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas.

"There are mitigating factors involved here, the CPI analysis points out, not least being the fact that Donald Trump is largely self-funding his campaign (the fact that the controversial GOP frontrunner remains ahead of his rivals in the delegate count could also have defense industry donors betting that either Clinton or Sanders has a better shot at winning the Presidency in November)."-RealTool's article

So, Tool, are you beginning to understand now that Republicans don't stand a chance?
Even the well-moneyed corporate rat's have abandoned the Republican sinking ship.

This isn't about who they think will spend the most money on the military.
It's about who they think could actually win, so why waste money on the losers.

Thank you, Donald Trump. :lol:

Trump is the government vendors' worse nightmare, he'll be all over their fraudulent charges and kick backs to government workers. 12 public school principles in Detroit were all just arrested for receiving millions in kickbacks for allowing the vendors to charge for services and goods never provided. It's in every government agency in every State, they know Hillary and Sanders won't rock the boat but Trump will clean house and question where the money is going.

RealJustme wrote:No duh, they know who will keep their gravy train going! Plus they own the Clintons.

Defense industry donors prefer Hillary and Bernie over GOP rivals. The defense industry prefers Democrats Hillary Clinton and Sen. Bernie Sanders over their GOP counterparts. According to an analysis by the Center for Public Integrity, Hillary Clinton has collected the most campaign contributions from employees of the 50 largest Pentagon contractors over a 14-month period ending in February.

Not only that, but Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont--the same Sen. Bernie Sanders comes in at No. 2, edging out hawkish Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas.

So the defense industry has given up on Trump?

Nicely done Justme!

:lol:

The military is weak now, and threats mount globally.

Trump would build the military.

Hillary probably views the military just as Obama does -- as a global threat itself rather than a positive force.

“I hear stories,” Trump said in a speech before the New Hampshire primary, “like they’re ordering missiles they don’t want because of politics, because of special interests, because the company that makes the missiles is a contributor.”

Vote for Trump.

Clownkicker wrote:
So, Tool, are you beginning to understand now that Republicans don't stand a chance?
Even the well-moneyed corporate rat's have abandoned the Republican sinking ship.

:lol:

Hey fool...your post is meaningless because you made a grammatical error....what's the matter with you anyway?
ESL problems like you berate "others' for on here?
Doesn't even know plural vs. possessive....tsk tsk.

Hey fool...your post is meaningless because nothing you said has anything to do with me.

I never berate anyone for grammar. If you think I'm wrong, find an example of me berating someone's grammar and rub my nose in it. :lol:
But you won't because you can't.

I ridicule those who are too stupid to understand how stupid they are, especially those assholes pretending to be superior to others while simultaneously they are obliviously making fools of themselves.
RealTool, for example, starts entire threads based on a faulty understanding of the language, both written and spoken.
His posts are often gibberish because of it.

But in my case you understand exactly what I intended to say despite the typo. You even know that I thoroughly understand the plural and possessive. You're just being a jackass about it thinking you are making some sort of point, which you didn't.
So, since you can't refute a thing I said, you make up some idiotic excuse to pretend my position is wrong.

That's the difference. You can understand me.The typo doesn't affect the meaning of my post in any practical way. RealTool's ESL-level grasp of the language, however, affects his posts every day, even as he's calling others ignorant.

And you, tvd? You just have a sloppy, contradictory belief system that you are understandably unable to defend, so you pout and stamp your feet and walk away muttering that I am the one who is sick.
Of course, you can't make a case for why you think I'm sick. You simply make a pronouncement and walk away like a coward. :lol:

Can you guy's believe this fucking fool?

Say's he never berate's anybody for grammar....un-fucking believable.

Just more silly ass word games from the queen of silly ass word games, the Dull, Rusty Tool AssClown Loser Lucky the pathetic cripple. His handlers are ashamed of him.

As I said, tvd, show me an example of me EVER berating someone's grammar.
You won't because you can't. (Put I'mStupid on it. He's got plenty of his useless life to piss away. :lol: )

All you have is your predictable pouting, mumbling, and walking away, which you did again just now.

Clown has his panties in a wad, I wasn't aware he was so sensitive about his grammar errors!

I came to the conclusion many post's ago that it is a useles's endeavor to try to reply to you.
You are literally a wa'ste of my time.

I will post when I want, on the subject's that i want, and will not "refute anything you say". It is a total wa'ste of time.

Because you, the smartest guy in the room, would never, ever allow ANYTHING you post to be refuted anyway.

Your entire raison d'etre for being on this site is to stir shit.
That is all you do. I have long noticed that no matter what is posted, you take the opposite position.
Sociopathic brain functioning there. To always disagree with everything. And then to take great delight in it.
That's you.

No, you are a fucking waste of time.
So go back to jerking off to word's worth

tvd, admitting you are incapable of making a cogent argument against my positions doesn't make ME look bad, dummy. :lol:

But my entire raison d'etre for being on this site is to not let you reactionary assholes just spew stupid shit without someone calling you on your stupidity.

Clown if you're going to use "raison d'etre" you should leave out (entire) other wise it's like saying my "only entire reason." Take a deep breath, sit down and once you get over your shaking go ahead and thank me! On second thought, I don't need to tell you to sit down, silly me.

"Your entire raison d'etre for being on this site is to stir shit."-tvd

"Clown if you're going to use "raison d'etre" you should leave out (entire) other wise it's like saying my "only entire reason."-RealStupidFuck

Once again RealTool sticks his foot in it and skewers his own guy.
Meanwhile, he's too stupid to recognize my copy-and-paste spoof of his butt buddy.

It's that unfortunate ESL problem of yours again, Tool. :lol:

RealJustme wrote:Clown if you're going to use "raison d'etre" you should leave out (entire) other wise it's like saying my "only entire reason." Take a deep breath, sit down and once you get over your shaking go ahead and thank me! On second thought, I don't need to tell you to sit down, silly me.

Now see, he's gonna come in gun's a blazin' and throw out some snide criticism of your understanding of the term "raison d'etre."
Cause that's what he does...stirs shit.

So, no, you actually SHOULD use "entire" with the phrase, as it would translate to (roughly) "entire reason to be".
That's what I meant when I placed the phrase initially.

The only reason he is here is to stir shit. No one, and I mean no one, could possibly disagree with everything posted, unless they were doing it purposefully, which is why I wrote him off many posts ago.

If I choose to waste my time I will. (Like now, for example.) But I sure won't dance like a puppet and immediately begin a search of this website for an example of his berating grammar, spelling, errors like he commanded that I do earlier.
I surely won't dance like a puppet and waste time "refuting what he says." He would not accept it anyway.

I don't dance for psychos.

See? Exactly as I predicted. He blazed in while I was typing.

Psycho.

Tweaking the clown makes my day. Good going TVD, you have him spazzing out on this one. Watch him come back with a long rant trying to defend his previous errors on this thread.

Here's what I predict....and I post it now which jeopardizes it ever actually happening.

He will go back and look at the timestamps on my post vs. his post, and swear maniacally that I waited until I read his BS, and then crafted my post to read as it did.

When I reply that it took me a while to write/type my post, he will state that I am obviously too dumb to understand anything, and that shows in my typing speed.
You know, like I talk in a slow drawl, so I am obviously a slow typer, and therefore too dumb to be on this board.

Sumpthin' like that....

No...I got him figured out. A long time ago.
And the glee he gets from stirring shit, never offering any valid discussion, always "you're too stupid, too dumb to possibly know the level he speaks from, always assuming his ideas as true and then using that false assumption to make his invalid point,...well that is a sure sign of some Adonis complex psychopath who thinks his shit don't stink.

I bet again....no friends because he is such an insufferable boor.

Hmmm, no clown response, hope we didn't drive him over the edge, his desperate posts attempting to defend himself give me much pleasure.