The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

Iran on Tuesday again threatened to walk away from the nuclear agreement reached last year with global powers, hours after the country breached international agreements by test-firing ballistic missiles.

Iran’s most recent ballistic missile test, which violates current U.N. Security Council resolutions, comes a day after the international community’s nuclear watchdog organization disclosed that it is prohibited by the nuclear agreement from publicly reporting on potential violations by Iran.

Iranian leaders now say that they are poised to walk away from the deal if the United States and other global powers fail to advance the Islamic Republic’s “national interests.”

“If our interests are not met under the nuclear deal, there will be no reason for us to continue,” Abbas Araqchi, Iran’s deputy foreign minister, warned during remarks delivered to a group of Iranian officials in Tehran.

“If other parties decide, they could easily violate the deal,” Araqchi was quoted as saying by Iran’s state-controlled media. “However, they know this will come with costs.”

“Far from pushing Iran to a more moderate engagement with its neighbors, this nuclear deal is enabling Iran’s aggression and terrorist activities,” McCarthy said in a statement. “Sanctions relief is fueling Iran’s proxies from Yemen to Iraq to Syria to Lebanon. Meanwhile, Khamenei and the Iranian regime are acting with impunity because they know President Obama will not hold them accountable and risk the public destruction of his nuclear deal, the cornerstone of the president’s foreign policy legacy.”

McCarthy went on to demand that the Obama administration step forward with new sanctions as punishment for the missile test.

Meanwhile, the U.S. State Department had difficulty Monday explaining why the nuclear agreement limits public reporting by the International Atomic Energy Agency, or IAEA, on potential deal violations by Iran.

Yukiya Amano, the IAEA’s chief, disclosed on Monday that his agency is no longer permitted to release details about Iran’s nuclear program and compliance with the deal. The limited public reporting is a by product of the nuclear agreement, according to Amano.

The White House explained that Iran's actions are just a minor set back and that the agreement remains in tack. Ask if it was a mistake to release the frozen funds, prior to compliance, the spokesperson said had they not released the funds, there would be no agreement.

There you have it folks, everyone with a brain knew this was going to happen. What did accidently leak out was that we actually agreed with Iran not to tell the American public or anyone else about Iran's violations. Who's side is Obama on? The fact Iran demands we continue to advance the Islamic Republic’s “national interests” is very telling.

There you have it folks, everyone with a brain knew this was going to happen.

I don't knooow....I'm betting Clown disagrees with you.

We've all seen dumb international deals in our time.

But this Iran deal takes the cake for sheer stupidity on Kerry's part.

How would you know, johnny?
Did you actually read it? Of course not. :lol:
You only 'know' what your handlers have told you to think.

"... everyone with a brain knew this was going to happen."-RealTool
"I don't knooow....I'm betting Clown disagrees with you."-sillydummy

Wrong, semen breath, you lost that bet.
Of course I knew it was going to happen, numbnuts.
Every treaty is broken by the party under the strongest restrictions; in this case, the ones forced to give up nukes for the duration of the treaty.
They do it to test the response to a violation and to test our resolve. They want to know what they can get away with.
We do the same thing ourselves. It's just part of the game.
And I guarantee Iran will do it again in the years to come.
This doesn't mean the treaty is not a success. It just means Iran isn't going to roll over and play dead the way reactionary morons expect them to once they sign a treaty. You clueless clowns actually expect people of other cultures to behave according to your warped value system.

But what else would you expect from a RealTool who thinks sanctions against military equipment for North Korea are a bad idea?

Clowntoker, you are undermining your own argument.

A secret deal which releases 150 billion to the globe's largest state sponsor of terrorism, and a deal giving us nothing, is insanely bad in terms of "negotiation."

Valerie Jarrett, wasn't she born in Iran? Obama grew up partly in Indonesia, didn't he?

Perhaps that accounts for the sad fact that they don't favor Israel in the age-old Middle East mess?

Perhaps that explains this insane giveup deal with Iran?

Iranian leaders say that they are poised to walk away from the deal if the United States fails to advance the Islamic Republic’s “national interests.”

Yukiya Amano, the IAEA’s chief, disclosed on Monday that his agency is no longer permitted to release details about Iran’s nuclear program and compliance with the deal. The limited public reporting is a by product of the nuclear agreement, according to Amano.

Iran says thank you to Obama.