The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

In the academic world, perhaps the most prestigious publication on global warming is the International Journal of Ice Trend Analysis.

In the latest edition, John R. Recondite (D. Phil., Oxon) concludes:

"Based upon our latest inquiries, we now believe it is reasonable to conclude that anthropogenic global warming is a fallacious theory based primarily upon political ideology rather than empirical data...".

"Based upon our latest inquiries, we now believe it is reasonable to conclude that anthropogenic global warming is a fallacious theory based primarily upon political ideology rather than empirical data...".

Take that Clown, now don't you feel silly!

I googled johnny's pretend article and got: "No results found for "Based upon our latest inquiries, we now believe it is reasonable to conclude that anthropogenic global warming is a fallacious theory based primarily upon political ideology rather than empirical data..."

Apparently it's such a prestigious publication that they don't actually publish it for the broader scientific community.
It's reserved solely for the delusions in your head, I guess.
Of course, if johnny would post a link to his crap sometime, maybe he wouldn't make such a huge ass of himself.

So sure, take that, dimwit. Now don't you feel silly? :lol:

Clown I suspect your Google has a liberal only setting on it, I found the article on my first try. it's an excellent article supported by "real" data.

Wow, that Clownslacker is really a skeptic.

My staffers spent an entire week analyzing the great scholarly work being done on climate change, and Clowntoker dismisses it out of hand because he doesn't have a search engine on his IBM PC Jr.

See? RealTool couldn't find it either. :lol:

I googled it again and got zip....again.

So where's this pretend article, johnny?
It looks like just more conservative made up stupid shit.

"A New Article" and the same old bullshit!!!

:lol:

You could add up the education of Elkin and Clownlicker and not have one undergrad degree in any scientific topic.

It is just weird that the Left now seeks to pretend it cares about science when all it cares about is socialism, which had essentially failed worldwide even before Obama's disastrous tenure.

Clown doubles down on stupid. :lol:

Any link to the article?

Or a link to the "prestigious" journal?

:lol:

Link?

Surely you know how to Google?

You claimed it...so you find it and post it!

Any time tardo!!!

:lol:

You claimed it...so you find it and post it!

He did post it, I googled it because I wanted to learn more about his amazing scientist, I found it so can you.

This is what RealTool, johnforbes, and Insipid are reduced to.
They've had their noses rubbed in their stupidity so often that they have to fabricate lies in an attempt to win an argument.

johnny's fake "Journal" doesn't even exist, let alone the pretend article he made up.

Lying scumbags... :lol:

Clown, don't expect me to do your homework.

Many others have found the article, and so can you.

I don't expect you to do MY homework, johnny.
I expect you to do YOUR homework.
This is a good example of why you failed as a lawyer.
"Many others" haven't found the article, dimwit.

RealTool is the only one who pretended to find it. Nobody else could.
If you believe him, you're the biggest idiot on this board, and that's saying something.

Both you and he could have easily shut me up by simply posting a link.
But you didn't because you can't. :lol:

Many others have found this fascinating scholarly article.

It isn't my job to do Clownhicker's homework and help him get his GED.

I don't know about all that, but I DO know about THIS:

The IPCC’s prediction is that there should have been a sixth of a degree of warming over the past decade. However, there has barely been any at all.

Considering that governments have placed heavy reliance upon the IPCC, and that the environmental-extremist movement has repeatedly said that it was more certain about the future course of global temperature than about anything else in science, the failure of global temperatures to keep pace even with the IPCC’s latest and much-reduced global-warming projections is remarkable.

The failure extends upward even to the climatically-crucial mid-troposphere, where the predicted temperature “hot spot” (which I had the honor to name) has not appeared in observed reality, despite some disfiguring revisionist attempts to make it appear ex post facto.

The failure is evident in all 73 of the models examined by Christy (2013), not only confirming the models’ propensity to exaggerate warming but also reinforcing the observations showing that there has been no global warming for a decade and a half, since theory would lead us to expect a near-tripling of the tropical surface warming rate in the tropical mid-troposphere if there had been any global warming, but no such tripling has occurred.

-snip-


Two years have passed since the Qatar climate conference at which the inadvertent delegate from Burma announced, to shrieks of astonishment, horror, and dismay from his fellow-delegates, that there had been no global warming for 16 years, and that perhaps it was time to call in some independent scientists to do a review of the science to make sure that these increasingly unimportant climate conferences were still heading in the right direction.

At that time, The Pause was very little known, for it did not fit the official story-line and had gone almost entirely unreported in the mainstream news media. So the delegates shrieked in fury, and in fear that their gravy-train had finally toppled over the Stanton curve at more than the mandatory 15 mph.

How long will the now well-known Great Pause continue? Professor Lindzen answered that one during an important lecture in Colombia four years ago. He said the probability of the world being warmer than the present in 50 years’ time is one-half. It is as likely that the world will not be warmer than today as it is that it will be.

For it remains possible that our true influence on the climate is so minuscule that the continuing diminution in solar activity that is now widely expected will be more than enough to neutralize all our greenhouse-gas forcings for many decades to come.

From:http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/01/28/g ... eat-shelf/

There is a TON of info here, most of which will cause the man caused global warming hysterics to run screaming into the night.

Clownhacker has forgotten one of the great lessons of life -- i.e., that he should not universalize his own limitations.

Many others have emailed me about this article.

It is a shame Clownhicker expects others to do his homework for him.

Yes, johnny, you still have nothing.

We got it already. We' aren't as stupid as you are.

What is it about you clowns that compels you to repeat lies and nonsense ad infinitum? :lol:

http://www.businessinsider.com/r-world- ... ?r=UK&IR=T" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Without the right policies to keep the poor safe from extreme weather and rising seas, climate change could drive over 100 million more people into poverty by 2030, the World Bank said on Sunday.

In a report, the bank said ending poverty - one of 17 new U.N. goals adopted in September - would be impossible if global warming and its effects on the poor were not accounted for in development efforts.

Of course the deniers here are convinced that these mothers and fathers are going to just sit by and watch their children starve. :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o

It would be wise to look at what is happening in Greece; high unemployment among the younger people and rapidly rising prices is fueling the huge rise of NAZI organizations.

Many others have found this fascinating scholarly article.

It isn't my job to do Clownhicker's homework and help him get his GED.