The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

Poll: 3-in-4 say Benghazi panel politically motivated

Despite those concerns, 72% of all Americans say they see the Benghazi committee as mostly using its investigative mission for political gain, just 23% think it is conducting an objective investigation. Even Republicans are skeptical on this measure, with 49% saying the committee is trying to score political points vs. 47% who say it is conducting an objective investigation. Among Democrats, 85% see it as seeking political advantage and among independents that stands at 75%.

Come on, 3 in 4?

But Elkin's post is, as usual, idiotic.

What matters is what is true.

Hillary on 9/12/12 told the PM of Egypt that a video had "nothing" to do with Benghazi.

She told Chelsea the same.

Then she lied to the mother of one of the 4 brave dead men.

So we have the Sec of State, Rice, and Obama telling lies about Benghazi.

Elkin doesn't care, but he should care about a president and Sec of State lying about a foreign attack.

Uh huh...3 in 4.... right....

Truth of the matter is, that most likely, less than 1 in 10 would even know what Benghazi is.

Fucking country is asleep....at the mall....watching TMZ....and worried about the Kardashians and Bruce Jenner....

What johnforbes is trying to say is he couldn't find any faults with the poll elklindo posted.

Thus, john's idiotic yammering.

What matters is what is true.

Hillary on 9/12/12 told the PM of Egypt that a video had "nothing" to do with Benghazi.

She told Chelsea the same.

Then she lied to the mother of one of the 4 brave dead men.

So we have the Sec of State, Rice, and Obama telling lies about Benghazi.

Elkin doesn't care, but he should care about a president and Sec of State lying about a foreign attack.

johnforbes wrote:What matters is what is true.

Hillary on 9/12/12 told the PM of Egypt that a video had "nothing" to do with Benghazi.

She told Chelsea the same.

Then she lied to the mother of one of the 4 brave dead men.

So we have the Sec of State, Rice, and Obama telling lies about Benghazi.

Elkin doesn't care, but he should care about a president and Sec of State lying about a foreign attack.

Obstruction of justice charges for lying under oath???

tvd wrote:Uh huh...3 in 4.... right....

Truth of the matter is, that most likely, less than 1 in 10 would even know what Benghazi is.

Fucking country is asleep....at the mall....watching TMZ....and worried about the Kardashians and Bruce Jenner....

It seems that the GOP has hit rock bottom.

Benghazi - GOP Fail

IRS - GOP Fail

Obamacare repeal - GOP Fail

So when does the GOP wake up and smell the coffee and start about getting serious about getting back into the game?

elklindo69 wrote:
Obstruction of justice charges for lying under oath???

She should be charged but Obama's lacky at the DOJ (Lynch) will never act independently and do the the right thing. Obstruction charges may be harder to prove but Hillary should definitely be brought up on charges for compromising classified documents (keeping them on her private server). But the only way any charges will be pressed is if Obama throws her under the bus.

That's correct.

Lois Lerner clearly obstructed justice, and so did others at the IRS who cooperated in destroying hard drives and erasing tape backups.

Hillary, by her own email, lied about Benghazi, which is a lie about foreign policy, and she told that lie to help a fellow Democrat win the 2012 election.

Lynch has, so far, been just as partisan as Holder.

Elkindoofus, the charge for lying under oath would be perjury. Only one of the many felonies Her Royal Thighness, Killary the pantsuited cankle queen has committed.